FROM COVERT PROCESSES TO OVERT OUTCOMES OF REFUTATION TEXT READING: THE INTERPLAY OF SCIENCE TEXT STRUCTURE AND WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY THROUGH EYE FIXATIONS

Alexander, P. A. & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285–310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Alloway, T. P., Banner, G. E. & Smith, P. (2010). Working memory and cognitive style in adolescents’ attainment. British Journal of Education Psychology, 80, 567–581. Ariasi, N. & Mason, L. (2011). Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eye-tracking study. Instructional Science, 39, 581–601. Baddeley, A. & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press. Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M. & Reynolds, R. E. (2010). The nature of the refutation text effect: An investigation of attention allocation. Journal of Educational Research, 103, 407–423. Burton, C. & Daneman, M. (2007). Compensating for a limited working memory capacity during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Reading Psychology, 28, 163–186. Chambliss, M. J. (2002). The characteristics of well-designed science textbooks. In J. Otero, J. Leön & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 51–72). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D. & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43. Chinn, C. A. & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical text of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 623–654. Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children’s responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 327–343. Cromley, J. G. (2009). Reading achievement and science proficiency: International comparisons from the Programme on International Student Assessment. Reading Psychology, 30, 89–116. Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E. & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 687–700. Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. Daneman, M. & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–443. Diakidoy, I. N., Mouskounti, T. & Ioannides, C. (2011). Comprehension and learning from refutation and expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 22–38. Dole, J. A. & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33, 109–128. Defrancesco, S. & Oss, M. (2006). Scoprire la fisica quotidiana [Discovering everyday physics] Trento. Italy: Erickson. Diakidoy, I. N., Kendeou, P. & Ioannides, C. (2003). Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 335–356. Fox, E. (2009). The role of reader characteristics in processing and learning from informational text. Review of Educational Research, 79, 202–300. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R. & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430–445. Graesser, A. C., Leon, J. A. & Otero, J. (2002). Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon & A. C. Graeeser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 1–15). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V. & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117–159. Härtel, H. (2000). The tides—A neglected topic. Physics Education, 35, 40–45. Hynd, C. (1998). Conceptual change in a high school physics class. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 27–36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hynd, C. (2001). Refutational text and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 699–714. Hynd, C., Qian, G., Ridgeway, V. & Pickle, M. (1991). Promoting conceptual change with science texts and discussion. Journal of Reading, 34, 596–601. Hyönä, J. & Lorch, R. F. (2004). Effects of topic headings on text processing: Evidence from adult readers’ eye fixation patterns. Learning and Instruction, 14, 131–152. Hyönä, J. & Nurminen, A.-M. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 31–50. Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F. & Kaakinen, J. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 44–55. Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354. Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. Kaakinen, J., Hyönä, J. & Keenan, J. (2003). How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixation in expository text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 3, 447–457. Kendeou, P., Muis, K. R. & Fulton, S. (2011). Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes. Journal of Research in Reading, 3, 1–19. Kendeou, P. & van den Broek, P. (2005). The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 235–245. Kendeou, P. & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1567–1577. Kerlinger, F. N. & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Forth Worth: Harcourt. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357–380. Lorch, R. F. & Lorch, E. P. (1996). Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 38–48. Mason, L. & Gava, M. (2007). Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 165–196). Oxford: Elsevier. Mason, L., Gava, M. & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 291–309. Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C. & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60, 95–109. McNamara, D. S. & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288. Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2001). Improving conceptual change concerning photosynthesis through text design. Learning and Instruction, 11, 241–257. Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Penttinen, M., Anto, E. & Olkinuora, E. (2008). Problems of constructing mental models during learning from science text. Eye tracking methodology meets conceptual change. In Understanding models for learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Norbert M. Seel (pp. 63–79). New York: Routledge. Murphy, P. K. (2001). What makes a text persuasive? Comparing students’ and experts’ conceptions of persuasiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 675–698. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill. Pazzaglia, F., Palladino, P. & De Beni, R. (2000). Presentazione di uno strumento per la valutazione della memoria di lavoro verbale e sua relazione con i disturbi della comprensione [An instrument for the assessment of verbal working memory and of its relation with comprehension difficulties]. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 3, 465–486. Qian, G. & Pan, J. (2002). A comparison of epistemological beliefs and learning from science text between American and Chinese high school students. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology. The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 365–385). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. She, H.-C. & Chen, Y.-Z. (2009). The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements. Computers & Education, 53, 1297–1307. Sinatra, G. M. & Broughton, S. W. (2011). Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutation text. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 374–393. Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutational text in science education. A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 951–970. Tsai, M.-J., Hou, H.-T., Lai, M.-L., Liu, W.-Y. & Yang, F.-Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58, 375–385. van den Broek, P. W. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328(5977), 453–456. van den Broek, P. & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335–351. doi:10.1002/acp.1418. van Gog, T. & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 95–99. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. Viiri, J. (1999). Tides in textbooks, expert teachers’ ideas and students’ understanding. In M. Komorek et al. (Eds.), Research in science education: Past, present and future. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Kiel, Germany. Viiri, J. (2000). Students’ understanding of tides. Physics Education, 35, 100–105. vonHecker, U. & Dutke, S. (2004). Integrative social perception: Individuals low in working memory benefit more from external representations. Social Cognition, 22, 336–365. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69. Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2013). International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 377–394). New York: Routledge.