Exploring expert perceptions about microplastics: from sources to potential solutions
Tóm tắt
Concern about plastic pollution, including microplastics, is high amongst European citizens, and effective actions are needed to reduce microplastic pollution. However, there is still uncertainty and debate about the major sources, impacts, and in particular the solutions. The aim of the current study was to gather expert perceptions about the risks of different microplastic sources to the natural environment and human health (measured as the likelihood and severity of negative impacts resulting from exposure), as well as the feasibility and effectiveness of different solutions. Experts were identified as scientists working on plastic. Usable responses were received from 73 experts with an average of 5 years’ experience in plastic research. Experts thought that there was currently stronger evidence for microplastic impacts on the natural environment than on human health, that, accordingly, the risks were higher, and they were more worried about impacts on the natural environment than on human health. Experts perceived tyre particles and textile fibres to be the main sources of microplastics presenting risk for both natural environment and human health. Various solutions were rated as relatively effective and feasible overall. Solutions that were rated as above-average in terms of effectiveness and feasibility included education and awareness programmes, washing machine filters, bans of plastic items, simplified design of products, and circular economy approaches. However, experts were uncertain about the effectiveness and feasibility of recovery and clean-up solutions, with overall ratings for these being below-average in comparison to other solutions earlier in the plastic life cycle. An improved understanding of expert views on these matters could inform the distribution of limited research resources and help prioritise research questions, especially with regard to potential solutions and interventions which will be critical for the success of the UN Plastics Treaty.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Thompson RC, Swan SH, Moore CJ, vom Saal FS. Our plastic age. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1526):1973–6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0054.
Andrady AL, Neal MA. Applications and societal benefits of plastics. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1526):1977–84. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0304.
Wagner M, Lambert S. Freshwater microplastics. Emerging environmental contaminants?. Cham (CH): Springer; 2018.
Zeng EY. Microplastic contamination in aquatic environments: an emerging matter of environmental urgency. Amsterdam (NL): Elsevier; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-04784-8.
GESAMP. “Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: a global assessment”. 2015 p. 96. (Kershaw PJ, editor. IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/UNEP/UNDP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection.). Report No.: Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 90. Available from: http://www.gesamp.org/publications/reports-and-studies-no-90.
Boonstra WJ, Ottosen KM, Ferreira ASA, Richter A, Rogers LA, Pedersen MW, et al. What are the major global threats and impacts in marine environments? Investigating the contours of a shared perception among marine scientists from the bottom-up. Mar Policy. 2015;1(60):197–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.06.007.
Provencher JF, Liboiron M, Borrelle SB, Bond AL, Rochman C, Lavers JL, et al. A Horizon Scan of research priorities to inform policies aimed at reducing the harm of plastic pollution to biota. Sci Total Environ. 2020;13:139381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139381.
Catarino AI, Kramm J, Völker C, Henry TB, Everaert G. Risk posed by microplastics: Scientific evidence and public perception. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 2021;16:100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100467.
Davison SMC, White MP, Pahl S, Taylor T, Fielding K, Roberts BR, et al. Public concern about, and desire for research into, the human health effects of marine plastic pollution: Results from a 15-country survey across Europe and Australia. Glob Environ Change. 2021;1(69):102309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102309.
European Commission. Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. 2020. Cited 2021 Aug 30. (Special Eurobarometer). Report No.: 501. Available from: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2257 .
Kramm J, Steinhoff S, Werschmöller S, Völker B, Völker C. Explaining risk perception of microplastics: Results from a representative survey in Germany. Glob Environ Change. 2022;1(73):102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102485.
Felipe-Rodriguez M, Böhm G, Doran R. What does the public think about microplastics? Insights from an empirical analysis of mental models elicited through free associations. Front Psychol. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920454.
Keller A, Wyles KJ. Straws, seals, and supermarkets: Topics in the newspaper coverage of marine plastic pollution. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021;1(166):112211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112211.
Thompson RC, Pahl S, Sembiring E. Plastics treaty—research must inform action. Nature. 2022;608(7923):472–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-02201-0.
World Health Organization. Dietary and inhalation exposure to nano-and microplastic particles and potential implications for human health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240054608.
Wardman T, Koelmans AA, Whyte J, Pahl S. Communicating the absence of evidence for microplastics risk: Balancing sensation and reflection. Environ Int. 2021;1(150):106116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106116.
Völker C, Kramm J, Wagner M. On the Creation of Risk: Framing of Microplastics Risks in Science and Media. Glob Chall. 2020;4(6):1900010. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201900010.
Anderson AG, Grose J, Pahl S, Thompson RC, Wyles KJ. Microplastics in personal care products: Exploring perceptions of environmentalists, beauticians and students. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;113(1):454–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.048.
Henderson L, Green C. Making sense of microplastics? Public understandings of plastic pollution. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;1(152):110908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110908.
Thiele CJ, Hudson MD. Uncertainty about the risks associated with microplastics among lay and topic-experienced respondents. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):7155. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86569-5.
SAPEA, Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. A Scientific Perspective on Microplastics in Nature and Society. Berlin: SAPEA; 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26356/microplastics.
Koelmans AA, Redondo-Hasselerharm PE, Nor NHM, de Ruijter VN, Mintenig SM, Kooi M. Risk assessment of microplastic particles. Nat Rev Mater. 2022;7(2):138–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00411-y.
Mehinto AC, Coffin S, Koelmans AA, Brander SM, Wagner M, Thornton Hampton LM, et al. Risk-based management framework for microplastics in aquatic ecosystems. Microplastics Nanoplastics. 2022;2(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-022-00033-3.
Garvey PR, Lansdowne ZF. Risk matrix: an approach for identifying, assessing, and ranking program risks. Air Force J Logist. 1998;22(1):18–21.
Fletcher W, Rick J. Review and refinement of an existing qualitative risk assessment method for application within an ecosystem-based management framework. ICES J Mar Sci. 2015;72(3):1043–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu142.
Ni H, Chen A, Chen N. Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Saf Sci. 2010;48(10):1269–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.04.005.
GESAMP. Proceedings of the GESAMP International Workshop on assessing the risks associated with plastics and microplastics in the marine environment. 2020 p. 68. (Kershaw PJ, Carney Almroth B, Villarrubia-Gómez P, Koelmans AA, Gouin T, editors. IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/ UNEP/UNDP/ISA Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection). Report No.: Reports to GESAMP No. 103. Available from: http://www.gesamp.org/publications/gesamp-international-workshop-on-assessing-the-risks-associated-with-plastics-and-microplastics-in-the-marine-environment.
Roman L, Hardesty BD, Schuyler Q. A systematic review and risk matrix of plastic litter impacts on aquatic wildlife: A case study of the Mekong and Ganges River Basins. Sci Total Environ. 2022;15(843):156858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156858.
GESAMP. “Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: part two of a global assessment”. 2016 p. 220. (Kershaw PJ, Rochman CM, editors. IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/ UNEP/UNDP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection). Report No.: Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 93. Available from: http://www.gesamp.org/publications/microplastics-in-the-marine-environment-part-2.
Hartmann NB, Hüffer T, Thompson RC, Hassellöv M, Verschoor A, Daugaard AE, et al. Are we speaking the same language? Recommendations for a definition and categorization framework for plastic debris. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53(3):1039–47. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05297.
Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ, Teuten E, Tonkin A, Galloway T, et al. Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines woldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(21):9175–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201811s.
Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP, Davis A, Rowland SJ, John AW, et al. Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science. 2004;304(5672):838. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094559.
Woodall LC, Sanchez-Vidal A, Canals M, Paterson GL, Coppock R, Sleight V, et al. The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris. R Soc Open Sci. 2014;1(4):140317. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140317.
Siegfried M, Koelmans AA, Besseling E, Kroeze C. Export of microplastics from land to sea. A modelling approach Water Res. 2017;15(127):249–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.011.
Knight LJ, Parker-Jurd FN, Al-Sid-Cheikh M, Thompson RC. Tyre wear particles: an abundant yet widely unreported microplastic? Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27(15):18345–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08187-4.
Parker-Jurd FNF, Napper IE, Abbott GD, Hann S, Thompson RC. Quantifying the release of tyre wear particles to the marine environment via multiple pathways. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021;1(172):112897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112897.
Karlsson TM, Arneborg L, Broström G, Almroth BC, Gipperth L, Hassellöv M. The unaccountability case of plastic pellet pollution. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;129(1):52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.041.
Simpson P, Lefevre-Brévart S, Rheinberger C, Henrichson S, Elo P, Majoros L, et al. Regulation of microplastics in the EU. MICRO2022 Keynote presented at; 2022 Nov 15. Available from: https://www.micro.infini.fr/IMG/pdf/micro2022__reach_restriction_overview_simpson_15_11_2022.pdf.
Prata JC, Silva ALP, da Costa JP, Mouneyrac C, Walker TR, Duarte AC, et al. Solutions and Integrated Strategies for the Control and Mitigation of Plastic and Microplastic Pollution. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132411.
Life Cycle Initiative. Life Cycle Approach to Plastic Pollution. Available from: https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/life-cycle-approach-to-plastic-pollution/. Accessed 18 July 2022.
Zwicker MV, Brick C, Gruter GJM, van Harreveld F. (Not) Doing the Right Things for the Wrong Reasons: An Investigation of Consumer Attitudes, Perceptions, and Willingness to Pay for Bio-Based Plastics. Sustainability. 2021;13:6819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126819.
Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J, Stern PC, Vandenbergh MP. Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(44):18452–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908738106.
Pahl S, Richter I, Wyles K. Human Perceptions and Behaviour Determine Aquatic Plastic Pollution. In: Stock F, Reifferscheid G, Brennholt N, Kostianaia E, editors. Plastics in the Aquatic Environment - Part II: Stakeholders’ Role Against Pollution. Cham (CH): Springer; 2022. p. 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2020_672.
LimnoPlast. Microplastics In Europe’s Freshwater Ecosystems: From Sources to Solutions. Available from: https://www.limnoplast-itn.eu/. Accessed 12 July 2022.
Van der Linden S. The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. J Environ Psychol. 2015;41:112–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012.
Chemie Cluster Bayern. Hot seat: Maja Grünzner. Available from: https://chemiecluster-bayern.de/news/hot-seat-maja-grunzner-2/. Accessed 12 July 2022.
Society of Risk Analysis Europe. A little bit of your time for an experts' survey. Available from: https://www.sraeurope.eu/a-little-bit-of-your-time-for-an-experts-survey. Accessed 12 July 2022.
Smith N, Leiserowitz A. The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Anal. 2014;34(5):937–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12140.
Bostrom A. Mental models and risk perceptions related to climate change. In: Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.303.