Exploration of the Truth Values of Conditionals Set Up in Everyday Context and in Open Sentences

Antonini, S., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Indirect proof: What is specific to this way of proving? ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 401–412.

Beller, S., & Kuhnmünch, G. (2007). What causal conditional reasoning tells us about people’s understanding of causality. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(4), 426–460.

Bennett, J. (2003). A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford University Press.

Blanchette, I. (2006). The effect of emotion on interpretation and logic in a conditional reasoning task. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1112–1125.

Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C., & Goedhart, M. (2020). Logical reasoning in formal and everyday reasoning tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1673–1694.

Cobb, P., & Whitenack, J. W. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom videorecordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(3), 213–228.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

Cummins, D. D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O., & Rist, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory & Cognition, 19(3), 274–282.

Damarin, S. K. (1977). The interpretation of statements in standard logical form by preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(2), 123–131.

Dawkins, P. C., & Cook, J. P. (2017). Guiding reinvention of conventional tools of mathematical logic: Students’ reasoning about mathematical disjunctions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94, 241–256.

Dawkins, P. C., Inglis, M., & Wasserman, N. (2019). The use(s) of is in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100, 117–137.

Dawkins, P.C. & Norton, A. (2022) Identifying mental actions for abstracting the logic of conditional statements. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100954

De Vega, M., Urrutia, M., & Riffo, B. (2007). Cancelling updating in the comprehension of counterfactuals embedded in narratives. Memory & Cognition, 35(6), 1410–1421.

Dreyfus, T., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Ben’s consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 271–300.

Durand-Guerrier, V. (2003). Which notion of implication is the right one? From logical considerations to a didactic perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 5–34.

Durand-Guerrier, V. (2008). Truth versus validity in mathematical proof. ZDM the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(3), 373–384.

Durand-Guerrier, V. (2014). Logic in mathematics education. In M. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 361–364). Springer.

Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp, S., & Tanguay, D. (2012). Examining the role of logic in teaching proof. In G. Hanna & M. De Villiers (Eds.), ICMI study 19 book: Proof and proving in mathematics education (pp. 369–389). Springer.

Duval, R. (2007). Cognitive functioning and the understanding of mathematical processes of proof. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school (pp. 137–161). Sense Publishers.

Edgington, D. (1995). On conditionals. Mind, 104(414), 235–329.

Epp, S. S. (2003). The role of logic in teaching proof. The American Mathematical Monthly, 110(10), 886–899.

Fillenbaum, S. (1974). Information amplified: Memory for counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(1), 44–49.

Freudenthal, H. (1966). The Language of Logic. Elsevier Publishing Company.

Freudenthal, H. (1969). A teachers course colloquium on sets and logic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2(1), 32–58.

Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Goel, V., & Vartanian, O. (2011). Negative emotions can attenuate the influence of beliefs on logical reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 25(1), 121–131.

Grimaldi, R. P. (1998). Discrete and combinatorial mathematics: An applied introduction. Pearson.

Hadar, N. (1977). Children’s conditional reasoning, Part I: An intuitive approach to the logic of implication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8(4), 413–438.

Hadar, N. (1993). Mathematical induction: A focus on conceptual framework. School Science and Mathematics, 8, 408–417.

Hadar, N., & Henkin, L. (1978). Children’s conditional reasoning, Part II: Towards a reliable test of conditional reasoning ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 9(1), 97–114.

Hoyles, C., & Küchemann., D. (2002). Students’ understanding of logical implication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(3), 193–223.

Hub, A., & Dawkins, P. C. (2018). On the construction of set-based meanings for the truth of mathematical conditionals. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50, 90–102.

Lefford, A. (1946). The influence of emotional subject matter on logical reasoning. The Journal of General Psychology., 34(2), 127–151.

Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Blackwell.

Lucas, J. F. (1990). Introduction to abstract mathematics. Ardsley House.

O’Brien, T. C., Shapiro, B. J., & Reali, N. C. (1971). Logical thinking - Language and context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4(2), 201–219.

Palha, S., Dekker, R., Gravemeijer, K., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2013). Developing shift problems to foster geometrical proof and understanding. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 142–159.

Pfeifer, N. (2013). The new psychology of reasoning: A mental probability logical perspective. Thinking and Reasoning, 19(3), 329–345.

Quine, W. V. (1982). Methods of logic. Harvard University Press.

Reid, D. A., & Inglis, M. (2005). Talking about logic. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(2), 24–25.

Rogalski, J., & Rogalski, M. (2001). How do graduate mathematics students evaluate assertions with a false premise? In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), PME25@NL (Vol. 4, pp. 113–120). Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.

Santamaria, C., Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 1149–1154.

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press.

Shipman, B. A. (2013). Mathematical versus English meaning in implication and disjunction. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 32(1), 38–46.

Sriraman, B., & Knott, L. (2006). 1 or 0? Cantorian conundrums in the contemporary classroom, Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 20(2), 57-61.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.

Stylianides, A. J., Stylianides, G. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2004). Undergraduate students’ understanding of the contraposition equivalence rule in symbolic and verbal contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1), 133–162.

Stylianides, G., Stylianides, A. & Weber, K. (2017). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In J. Cai (ed.) Compendium for research in mathematics education. Reston (pp. 237–266). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2005). Using warranted implications to understand and validate proofs. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), 34–51.

Yopp, D. A. (2017). Eliminating counterexamples: A grade 8 student’s learning trajectory for contrapositive proving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 150–166.

Yu, J. Y. W., Chin, E. T., & Lin, C. J. (2004). Taiwanese junior high school students’ understanding about the validity of conditional statements. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 257–285.