Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Giáo dục văn học rõ ràng và dựa trên bằng chứng ở trường trung học: một nghiên cứu quan sát
Reading and Writing - Trang 1-22 - 2023
Tóm tắt
Dựa trên dữ liệu quốc gia, một tỷ lệ lớn học sinh trung học cơ sở, trong các lớp học theo lĩnh vực nội dung ở Hoa Kỳ, có thể được coi là những người đang phát triển kỹ năng đọc. Các thực hành văn học dựa trên bằng chứng và các phương pháp giảng dạy rõ ràng có thể hỗ trợ sự phát triển văn học của những học sinh này. Tuy nhiên, nghiên cứu cho thấy rằng giáo viên thường bỏ lỡ cơ hội để tích hợp các thực hành văn học dựa trên bằng chứng nhằm hỗ trợ học sinh tiếp cận văn bản, và ít có thông tin về việc sử dụng các phương pháp giảng dạy rõ ràng của giáo viên trung học cơ sở. Trong nghiên cứu quan sát này, chúng tôi ghi nhận việc sử dụng cả phương pháp giảng dạy rõ ràng và thực hành văn học dựa trên bằng chứng của 17 giáo viên trung học cơ sở ở Hoa Kỳ trong 51 bài học ở các lớp học nghệ thuật ngôn ngữ giáo dục công, khoa học và xã hội học. Chúng tôi phát hiện rằng hầu hết các phương pháp giảng dạy rõ ràng và các thực hành văn học không được sử dụng thường xuyên trong tất cả các lĩnh vực nội dung; trong một số lĩnh vực nội dung, một số thực hành quan trọng này không được sử dụng hoàn toàn. Chúng tôi thảo luận về các bối cảnh trong đó việc giảng dạy rõ ràng và/hoặc giảng dạy văn học dựa trên bằng chứng đã diễn ra, và tầm quan trọng của các mô hình văn học toàn trường và cơ hội học tập chuyên môn liên quan để tăng cường khả năng hỗ trợ các học sinh đang phát triển kỹ năng đọc của giáo viên các môn học ở trường trung học.
Từ khóa
#giáo dục văn học #giảng dạy rõ ràng #thực hành dựa trên bằng chứng #giáo viên trung học #kỹ năng đọcTài liệu tham khảo
Anderman, E. M., & Mueller, C. E. (2010). Middle school transitions and adolescent development. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 198–215). Routledge.
ACT. (2008). The forgotten middle: Ensuring that all students are on track for college and career readiness before high school. Executive summary. ACT. https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/ForgottenMiddle.pdf.
Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford.
Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281–3210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w
Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Ponitz, C. C., Glasney, S., Underwood, P. S., Piasta, S. B., Crowe, E. C., & Schatschneider, C. (2009). The ISI classroom observation system: Examining the literacy instruction provided to individual students. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332373
CCSS, 2022. Common core state standards. https://learning.ccsso.org/common-core-state-standards-initiative.
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory into Practice, 56(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1241947
Duru, A., & Koklu, O. (2011). Middle school students’ reading comprehension of mathematical texts and algebraic equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.550938
Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Lapp, D. (2012). Building and activating students’ background knowledge: It’s what they already know that counts: Teachers must assess and build on the background knowledge students possess. Middle School Journal, 43(3), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2012.11461808
Gilmour, A. F., Fuchs, D., & Wehby, J. H. (2019). Are students with disabilities accessing the curriculum? A meta-analysis of the reading achievement gap between students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918795830
Goldstein, S. E., Boxer, P., & Rudolph, E. (2015). Middle school transition stress: Links with academic performance, motivation, and school experiences. Contemporary School Psychology, 19(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0044-4
Greenleaf, C., Schoenbach, R., Cziko, C., & Mueller, F. (2001). Apprenticing adolescent readers to academic literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 71(1), 79–130. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.71.1.q811712577334038
Gutierrez de Blume, A. P., Katz, A., & Bass, J. (2021). Impact of literacy across content on middle school students’ reading comprehension in a rural context. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(2), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12334
Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Strycker, L. A., & Dennis, C. (2021). Measuring explicit instruction using classroom observations of student-teacher interactions (COSTI). Perspectives on Behavior Science, 44(2–3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00291-1
Gwet, K. (2001). Handbook of inter-rater reliability (pp. 223–246). STATAXIS Publishing Company.
Herrera, S., Truckenmiller, A. J., and Foorman, B. R. (2016). Summary of 20 years of research on the effectiveness of adolescent literacy programs and practices (REL 2016–178). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
Hughes, C. A., Morris, J. R., Therrien, W. J., & Benson, S. K. (2017). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 32, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12142
Johnson, E. S., Zheng, Y. Z., Crawford, A. R., & Moylan, L. A. (2018). Developing an explicit instruction special education teacher observation instrument. Journal of Special Education, 53(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918796224
Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. IES practice guide. NCEE 2008–4027. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguide/8.
Katims, D. S., & Harris, S. (1997). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(2), 116–123.
Kent, S. C., Wanzek, J., & Martinez, L. (2018). The application of empirically supported practices in middle school social studies classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 39(6), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517744662
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Luoto, J., Klette, K., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2023). Possible biases in observation systems when applied across contexts: Conceptualizing, operationalizing, and sequencing instructional quality. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 35(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09394-y
Magnusson, C. G., Roe, A., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2019). To what extent and how are reading comprehension strategies part of language arts instruction? A study of lower secondary classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.231
Martin, A. J. (2016). Using load reduction instruction (LRI) to boost motivation and engagement. British Psychological Society.
Mathews, H., Stark, K. R., Jones, N. D., Brownell, M. T., & Bell, C. A. (2021). Danielson’s framework for teaching: Convergence and divergence with conceptions of effectiveness in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420941804
Mayer, R. E. (2003). Memory and information processes. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 47–58). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0703
McLeskey, J., Council for Exceptional Children, & Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform. (2017). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children.
Murray, C. S., Stevens, E. A., & Vaughn, S. (2022). Teachers’ text use in middle school content-area classrooms. Reading and Writing, 35(1), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10177-y
Next Generation (2022a). Next generation science standards. https://www.nextgenscience.org/.
Reed, D. K., Wexler, J., & Vaughn, S. (2012). RTI for reading at the secondary level: Recommended literacy practices and remaining questions. Guilford Press.
Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48 (4), 369–390.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Berkeley, S., & Graetz, J. E. (2010). Do special education interventions improve learning of secondary content? A Meta-Analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327465
Schielack, J., & Seeley, C. L. (2010). Contemporary curriculum issues: Transitions from elementary to middle school math. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(6), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.16.6.0358
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
Smith, J. L. M., Sáez, L., & Doabler, C. T. (2018). Using explicit and systematic instruction to support working memory. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(4), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918758151
Stevens, E. A., Vaughn, S., House, L., & Stillman-Spisak, S. (2020). The effects of a paraphrasing and text structure intervention on the main idea generation and reading comprehension of students with reading disabilities in grades 4 and 5. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1684925
Swanson, E., Wanzek, J., McCulley, L., Stillman-Spisak, S., Vaughn, S., Simmons, D., Fogarty, M., & Hairrell, A. (2016). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 32(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.910718
Swanson, E., Stevens, E. A., Scammacca, N. K., Capin, P., Stewart, A. A., & Austin, C. R. (2017a). The impact of Tier 1 reading instruction on reading outcomes for students in Grades 4–12: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 30(8), 1639–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9743-3
Swanson, E., Vaughn, S., & Wexler, J. (2017b). Enhancing adolescents’ comprehension of text by building vocabulary knowledge. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917720777
Tengberg, M., Blikstad-Balas, M., & Roe, A. (2022). Missed opportunities of text-based instruction: What characterizes learning of interpretation if strategies are not taught and students not challenged? Teaching and Teacher Education, 115, 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103698
Tengberg, M., van Bommel, J., Nilsberth, M., Walkert, M., & Nissen, A. (2021). The quality of instruction in Swedish lower secondary language arts and mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(5), 760–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1910564
U.S. Department of Education (2022b). Students with disabilities. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg.
U.S. Department of Education. (2023a). All aboard the literacy special: Reading resources from the What Works Clearinghouse. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/literacyresources1.
U.S. Department of Education. (2023b). National assessment of educational progress (NAEP), 2022 reading assessment. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved May 1, 2023b, from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/.
Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., Taylor, M. J., Newman-Gonchar, R., Krowka, S., Kieffer, M. J., McKeown, M., Reed, D., Sanchez, M., St. Martin, K., Wexler, J., Morgan, S., Yañez, A., & Jayanthi, M. (2022). Providing reading interventions for students in grades 4–9 (WWC 2022007). Washington, DC. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://whatworks.ed.gov/.
Villanueva, M. G., & Hand, B. (2011). Science for all: Engaging students with special needs in and about science. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26(4), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00344.x
Wexler, J., Mitchell, M. A., Clancy, E. E., & Silverman, R. D. (2017). An investigation of literacy practices in high school science classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(3), 258-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1193832
Wexler, J., Kearns, D. M., Lemons, C. J., Mitchell, M., Clancy, E., Davidson, K. A., Sinclair, A.C., & Wei, Y. (2018). Reading comprehension and co-teaching practices in middle school English language arts classrooms. Exceptional Children, 84(4), 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918771543
Wormeli, R. (2011). Movin’up to the middle. Educational Leadership, 68(7), 48–53.
Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4
Zigmond, N. (2006). Reading and writing in co-taught secondary school social studies classrooms: A reality check. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560500455711