Experimental study on combustion and emissions of a compression ignition engine fueled with gasoline

Advances in Mechanical Engineering - Tập 14 Số 7 - 2022
Yan Hu1, Zhaoming Huang2, Li Wang2,3, Xiaodong Sun4, Weiguo Chen5
1School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Anhui Vocational & Technical College of Industry & Trade, Huainan, China
2School of Mechanical Engineering, Wanjiang University of Technology, Ma’anshan, China
3School of Mechatronics and Automobile, Xuancheng Vocational & Technical College, Xuancheng, China
4School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Huainan Union University, Huainan, China
5Engine Engineering Research Institute, Chery Automobile Co., Ltd., Wuhu, China

Tóm tắt

Gasoline compression ignition (GCI) is an effective way to achieve both high thermal efficiency and low emission. The combustion and emission performances of GCI and DCI (diesel compression ignition) were compared on a 2.0 L diesel engine equipped with Three-way catalyst-Lean NOx trap/Passive selective catalytic reduction (TWC-LNT/PSCR) aftertreatment system. In order to further clarify the advantages and disadvantages of GCI, this paper first studies the combustion and emission at 1500 rpm and braking average effective pressure (BMEP) of 4–9 bar. Secondly, six small map points of worldwide harmonized light vehicles test cycle (WLTC) are studied. The results show that the braking thermal efficiency (BTE) of GCI is lower than that of DCI at low load. When BMEP is greater than 5 bar, the BTE of GCI is significantly improved. GCI achieves a maximum BTE of 43%, which is 3% higher than DCI. Compared with DCI, the NOx emission of GCI is slightly lower, the smoke emission of filter smoke number (FSN) is significantly improved, and the CO and HC emissions are significantly increased. GCI engine equipped with TWC-LNT/PSCR system with high aftertreatment efficiency has the potential to meet China’s VI B emission regulations.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.060

10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.019

10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.004

10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.026

10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.055

10.1021/ef2019512

10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116743

10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00660

10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.085

10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.170

10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.09.004

10.1016/j.fuel.2010.02.023

10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.026

10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.090

10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.052

10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118211

10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.099

10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.501

10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.020

10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.045

10.1016/j.energy.2019.115931

10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.107

10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116881

10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.150

10.4271/2018-01-1032

10.4271/2015-01-1258