Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement
Tóm tắt
In the organizational sciences, scholars are increasingly using experience sampling methods (ESM) to answer questions tied to intraindividual, dynamic phenomenon. However, employing this method to answer organizational research questions comes with a number of complex—and often difficult—decisions surrounding: (1) how the implementation of ESM can advance or elucidate prior between-person theorizing at the within-person level of analysis, (2) how scholars should effectively and efficiently assess within-person constructs, and (3) analytic concerns regarding the proper modeling of interdependent assessments and trends while controlling for potentially confounding factors. The current paper addresses these challenges via a panel of seven researchers who are familiar not only with implementing this methodology but also related theoretical and analytic challenges in this domain. The current paper provides timely, actionable insights aimed toward addressing several complex issues that scholars often face when implementing ESM in their research.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen M. J., 2002, Introduction to measurement theory
Barta W. D., 2012, Handbook of research methods for studying daily life, 108
Beal D. J., The handbook for multilevel theory, measurement, and analysis
Box G. E., 2015, Time series analysis: forecasting and control
Cascio W., 2008, Investing in people: Financial impact of human resource initiatives
Cialdini R. B., 2009, Influence: Science and practice, 5
Cohen J., 2003, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3
Doll E. A., 1917, The Psychological Clinic, 11, 197
Gollwitzer P., 2011, Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications, 2, 162
Hersey R. B., 1932, Personnel Journal, 10, 355
Hofmann S. A., 2000, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, 75
Judge T. A., 2000, Journal of Applied Psychology, 21, 101
Klein K. J., 2000, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions
Larson R., 1983, Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction. New directions for methodology of social and behavioral sciences, 41
Lewis M., 2000, Handbook of emotions, 623
Matta F. K., 2017, An investigation of justice variability and stress. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 743
McNair D. M., 1971, EdITS manual for the Profile of Mood States
Muthén L. K., 1998, Mplus user’s guide, 7
Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric theory (2nd ed.)
Raudenbush S. W., 2002, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
Reis H. T., 2000, Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 190
Rights J. D., Psychological Methods
Rousseau D. M., 1985, Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1
Schwab D. P., 2005, Research methods for organizational studies
Scott B. A., 2014, A daily investigation of “hot” and “cold” motives and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1571
Scott B. A., The Oxford handbook of organizational citizenship behavior
Snijders T. A., 1999, Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling
Sonnentag S., 2008, A day-level study on recovery experiences, sleep, and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 674
Spearman C., 1910, British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271
Spence J. R., 2014, Feeling grateful as a predictor of daily organizational citizenship behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 67, 705
Watson D., 2000, Mood and temperament
Watson D., 1994, The PANAS-X. Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule
Weiss H. M., 1996, Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1
Zijlstra F. R. H., 2008, Time in organizations: Approaches and methods, 62