Examination of Lower Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Its Connection to Students’ Performance
Tóm tắt
This mixed methods study examined an association between cognitive types of teachers’ mathematical content knowledge and students’ performance in lower secondary schools (grades 5 through 9). Teachers (N = 90) completed the Teacher Content Knowledge Survey (TCKS), which consisted of items measuring different cognitive types of teacher knowledge. The first cognitive type (T1) assessed participants’ knowledge of basic facts and procedures. The second cognitive type (T2) measured teachers’ understanding of concepts and connections. The third cognitive type (T3) gauged teachers’ knowledge of mathematical models and generalizations. The study comprised two levels of quantitative data analysis. First, we explored each cognitive type of teachers’ content knowledge and the overall TCKS score as they related to student performance. Second, we studied the correlation between each cognitive type of teacher content knowledge to deepen the understanding of content associations. Results of the study show a statistically significant correlation between cognitive types T1 and T2 of teacher content knowledge and student performance (p < .05). The correlation between cognitive type T3 and student performance was not significant (p = .0678). The most substantial finding was the correlation between teachers’ total score on the TCKS and student performance (Pearson’s r = .2903, p = .0055 < .01). These results suggest that teachers’ content knowledge plays an important role in student performance at the lower secondary school. The qualitative phase included structured interviews with two of the teacher participants in order to further elaborate on the nature of the quantitative results of the study.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ball, D., Thames, M. & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Bishop, A., Mellin-Olsen, S. & van Dormolen, J. (1991). Mathematical knowledge: Its growth through teaching. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bransford, J., Brown, A. & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn (expandedth ed.). Washington: National Research Council.
Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of the tests. Psychometrica, 16, 297–334.
Davis, B. & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: An ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 293–319.
Fennema, E. & Loef-Franke, M. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147–165). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Goldhaber, D. & Brewer, D. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129–146.
Grossman, P., Schoenfeld, A. & Lee, C. (2005). Teaching subject matter. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and able to do (pp. 201–231). San-Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Henningsen, M. A. & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.
Hill, H., Ball, D. & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Hill, H., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
Hill, H., Schilling, S. & Ball, D. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105, 11–30.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IEA.
Leinhardt, G. & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 241–271.
Mason, J. & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1), 135–161.
McCrory, R., Floden, R., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Reckase, M. & Senk, S. (2012). Knowledge of algebra for teaching: A framework of knowledge and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 584–615.
Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation (2000). Federal education standards in special fields. Federal education standards for higher professional education in the field “Mathematics”. Qualification: Teacher of mathematics. Moscow, Russia: Ministry of Education and Science.
Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation (2004). Federal component of the general education standards. Mathematics. Moscow: Ministry of Education and Science.
Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P. & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.
Murray, M. (2004). Teaching mathematics vocabulary in context: windows, doors, and secret passageways. Portsmouth, England: Heinemann.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for success: Report of the task group on teachers and teacher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3–14.
Resnick, L. & Zuravsky, C. (2006). Do the math: Cognitive demand makes a difference. Research Points: Essential Information for Educational Policy, 4(2), 1–4.
Rowland, T., Huckstep, P. & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281.
Saderholm, J., Ronau, R., Brown, E. & Collins, G. (2010). Validation of the diagnostics teacher assessment of mathematics and science (DTAMS) instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 110(4), 180–192.
Schoenfeld, A. (2007). The complexities of assessing teacher knowledge. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 5(2–3), 198–204.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Skemp, R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9–15.
Stein, M., Smith, M., Henningsen, M. & Silver, E. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. Foreword by Deborah Ball. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Steinberg, T., Haymore, J. & Marks, R. (1985). Teacher’s knowledge and structuring content in mathematics. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of American Educational Research Association. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological knowledge for mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 157–189.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J., (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
Stylianides, A. & Stylianides, G. (2014). Viewing “mathematics for teaching” as a form of applied mathematics: Implications for the mathematical preparation of teachers. Notices of the AMS, 61(3), 266–276.
Tchoshanov, M., Lesser, L. & Salazar, J. (2008). Teacher knowledge and student achievement: Revealing patters. Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 13, 39–49.
Tchoshanov, M. (2011). Relationship between teacher content knowledge, teaching practice, and student achievement in middle grades mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(2), 141–164.
Valverde, Y. & Tchoshanov, M. (2013). Secondary mathematics teachers’ disposition toward challenge and its effect on teaching practice and student performance. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 3(98), 25–33.