Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata - Tập 47 Số 1 - Trang 3-14 - 1988
John N. Thompson1
1Departments of Botany and Zoology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA

Tóm tắt

Abstract

The relationship between oviposition preference and growth, survival, and reproduction of offspring is the crux of the problem in the evolution of host associations between phytophagous insects and plants. Observed relationships between oviposition preference and performance of offspring range from good to poor. At least four hypotheses have been suggested to explain observed use of particular host plants that may not result in the fastest growth rates or greatest pupal masses: time, patch dynamics, parasite versus grazer lifestyles, and enemy‐free space. Our current understanding of these relationships, however, is hampered by an almost complete lack of data on how preference and performance are related genetically. These data are needed to understand the origins of covariance between preference and performance and constraints on the evolution of host associations.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/BF00346988

10.1086/283859

10.1007/BF00349195

10.1111/j.1570-7458.1986.tb02156.x

10.1007/978-1-4615-8732-3_9

10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.002011

Bush G. L., 1982, Host shifts, genetic models of sympatric speciation and the origin of parasitic insect species, 297

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1977.tb01045.x

10.1007/BF00344658

10.1007/BF00541116

10.1126/science.1118723

Emmel J. F., 1978, Larval foodplant records of Papilio zelicaon in western United States, and further evidence of the conspecificity of P. zelicaon and P. gothica, J. Res. Lepid., 17, 56, 10.5962/p.266857

10.1016/B978-0-12-045580-5.50007-0

10.1126/science.211.4485.887

10.1016/B978-0-12-045580-5.50013-6

10.2307/2412661

10.1146/annurev.en.30.010185.001245

10.1086/284204

Gallun R. L., 1961, Four races of Hessian fly selected and developed from an Indiana population, Indiana Agr. Expt. Station Res. Bull., 732, 1

Gilbert L. E., 1979, Analysis of ecological systems, 210

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04735.x

10.1016/B978-0-12-209160-5.50027-1

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00570.x

10.1111/j.1570-7458.1978.tb02804.x

10.1111/j.1570-7458.1980.tb02943.x

10.1086/283771

10.1086/283955

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05630.x

10.2307/1942161

10.1093/genetics/94.1.203

Lawton J. H., 1979, Between the devil and the deep blue sea: on the problem of being a herbivore, Symp. Brit. Ecol. Soc., 20, 223

10.1093/ee/15.3.631

MacFarlane J. H., 1980, Development and survival of the two‐striped grasshopper Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) (Orthoptera: Acrididae), on various single and multiple plant diets, Acrida, 9, 63

Masuda K. K. 1981.The effects of two host plants Foeniculum vulgareMill. andCitrus sinensisOsbeck on adult oviposition behavior and larval and pupal biology of the anise swallowtail butterfly (Papilio zelicaonLucas) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae).Master's Thesis University of California Davis 82pp.

10.1007/978-1-4899-3368-3_6

10.2307/4630

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00504.x

10.1016/B978-0-12-045580-5.50008-2

10.1093/ee/11.1.85

10.1007/BF00310983

10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.000353

10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.002415

10.1126/science.218.4567.76

10.2307/2937304

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05078.x

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00324.x

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00325.x

10.1016/0305-1978(80)90024-1

10.1007/BF00379480

10.1007/BF00379135

10.1007/BF00379136

Scriber J. M., 1982, Food plants and speciation in the Papilio glaucus group, 307

Scriber J. M., 1983, Variable plants and herbivore in natural and managed systems, 373, 10.1016/B978-0-12-209160-5.50019-2

Scriber J. M., 1984, Nitrogen in crop production, 441

10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.001151

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1971.tb01892.x

10.1126/science.176.4030.75

10.1007/BF00363841

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05547.x

Singer M. C., 1984, The biology of butterflies, 82

10.1007/978-1-4612-4910-8_3

10.1126/science.201.4357.745

10.1007/BF00345999

10.1007/BF00376853

10.1007/BF00376853

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05523.x

10.1007/BF00348042

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05073.x

10.1017/S0007485300008440

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05862.x

10.7208/chicago/9780226127323.001.0001

10.2307/3544316

10.2307/4600

10.1111/j.1365-2311.1983.tb00500.x

10.1016/B978-0-08-050495-7.50019-3

Thompson J. N., 1986, Coevolution and systematics, 119

10.1016/0169-5347(86)90036-4

Thompson J. N., 1988, Variation in preference and specificity in monophagous and oligophagous swallowtail butterflies, Evolution, 10.2307/2409120

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00359.x

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00360.x

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00537.x

10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60230-1

10.1086/physzool.57.6.30155985

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04923.x

10.1007/BF00379790

10.1111/j.1570-7458.1973.tb00269.x

10.1163/187631274X00191

10.1007/BF00345421

10.2307/3544441

Wiklund C., 1982, Generalist versus specialist utilization of host plants among butterflies, 181

10.1007/BF00379780

10.1007/BF00379709

10.1007/BF00379708

10.1126/science.220.4594.310

10.1111/j.1570-7458.1985.tb00466.x