Evolution of light scattering and redox balance in the rat lens after in vivo exposure to close‐to‐threshold dose ultraviolet radiation

Acta Ophthalmologica - Tập 88 Số 7 - Trang 779-785 - 2010
Jing Wang1,2, Stefan Löfgren3, Xiuqin Dong3, Konstantin Galichanin1,3, Per G. Söderberg1
1Department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Gullstrand laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
2Department of Ophthalmology, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
3Karolinska Institutet, St. Erik’s Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Acta Ophthalmol. 2010: 88: 779–785Abstract.Purpose:  To investigate the evolution of cataract development and glutathione redox balance in the rat lens after in vivo close‐to‐threshold dose exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) around 300 nm.Methods:  Three groups of 10 Sprague–Dawley rats were unilaterally exposed to 8 kJ/m2 UVR‐300 nm for 15 min, and a fourth group of 10 rats was kept without UVR exposure as nonexposed control animals. The exposed animals were killed at 1, 3 and 7 days after exposure. Both lenses from all animals were extracted and photographed and the intensity of forward light scattering was measured quantitatively. Thereafter, the lenses were homogenized. The concentration of reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG), and the activity of glutathione reductase (GR) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), respectively, were determined spectrophotometrically. The mean paired differences between exposed and nonexposed lenses were used as primary data in the statistical analyses.Results:  All exposed lenses developed cataract. Lens light scattering increased throughout the 7 days after UVR exposure. GSH concentration and GPx rate transiently increased at 1 day after exposure and then decreased throughout follow‐up, with GSH concentration having a negative balance at the end. GSSG concentration and GR activity did not change after UVR exposure.Conclusion:  In vivo close‐to‐threshold UVR exposure induces a gradual increase in rat lens opacification/cataract development and time dependently alters the redox balance in the lens.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/0014-4835(78)90128-8

10.1006/exer.1999.0801

Ayala MN, 2000, Influence of exposure time for UV radiation‐induced cataract, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 41, 3539

Bernat R, 1968, Changes in concentration of glutathione, ascorbic acid and amino acids with sulfhydryl groups in experimental cataracts, Acta Physiol Pol, 19, 205

10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010379027

10.1016/S0076-6879(85)13062-4

10.2105/AJPH.82.12.1658

10.1001/archopht.1956.00930040595008

10.1167/iovs.02-0541

10.1159/000086596

10.1016/j.exer.2006.09.017

10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6

10.1080/02713680500477347

10.1089/jop.2000.16.121

10.1042/bj1170957

10.3109/02713689209000741

10.1016/0891-5849(96)02050-3

Löfgren S, 2001, Lens lactate dehydrogenase inactivation after UV‐B irradiation: an in vivo measure of UVR‐B penetration, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 42, 1833

Löfgren S, 1998, Influence of pupil size and eye pigmentation on ultraviolet radiation‐induced cataract. ICER abstract, Exp Eye Res, 67, 140

10.1167/iovs.01-0922

10.1016/S1350-9462(03)00050-8

Merriam J, 2000, An action spectrum for UV‐B radiation in the rat lens, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 41, 2642

Michael R, 2000, Ophthalmic Res, 1

10.1159/000267905

10.1007/s004170050132

Michael R, 1998, Apoptosis in the rat lens after in vivo threshold dose ultraviolet irradiation, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 13, 2681

10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00640.x

Pirie A, 1971, Contemporary ophthalmology, 494

10.1042/bj1250203

Risa O, 2004, Metabolic changes in rat lens after in vivo exposure to ultraviolet irradiation: measurements by high resolution MAS 1H NMR spectroscopy, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 45, 1916, 10.1167/iovs.03-1292

10.1016/j.exer.2005.02.012

10.1111/j.1755-3768.1988.tb04001.x

10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb04395.x

10.1159/000267035

Söderberg PG, 1990, Experimental cataract induced by ultraviolet radiation, Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh), 68, 1

10.1016/1011-1344(91)80085-V

10.1111/j.1755-3768.1986.tb06894.x

10.1111/j.1755-3768.1990.tb01648.x

10.1159/000060811

10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00033.x

10.1096/fasebj.9.12.7672510

10.1167/iovs.05-0237

10.1152/ajpcell.00398.2005

10.1056/NEJM198812013192201

Tessem M, 2006, Biological response in various compartments of the rat lens after in vivo exposure to UVR‐B analyzed by HR‐MAS 1H NMR spectroscopy, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 47, 5404, 10.1167/iovs.05-1633

10.1016/0005-2795(77)90212-4

10.1073/pnas.76.7.3504

10.3109/02713688408997186

10.1016/B978-0-12-380001-5.50022-0

10.1001/jama.280.8.714

WidmarkJ(1901):Über den Einfluss des Lichtes auf die Linse.

Zar JH, 1999, Testing for difference between two means. Biostatistical analysis, 122

10.1126/science.171.3973.807

Zigman S, 1974, Near‐ultraviolet light effects on the lenses and retinas of mice, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 13, 462

10.1016/0014-4835(73)90145-0

10.1016/0014-4835(73)90120-6

Zigman S, 1979, Sunlight and human cataracts, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 18, 462