Evaluation of Warfarin Management with International Normalized Ratio Self‐Testing and Online Remote Monitoring and Management Plus Low‐Dose Vitamin K with Genomic Considerations: A Pilot Study

Pharmacotherapy - Tập 33 Số 11 - Trang 1136-1146 - 2013
Henry I. Bussey1,2,3,4, Marie Bussey1,5, Kristin L. Bussey‐Smith6, Christopher R. Frei2,4
1ClotCare.org, San Antonio, Texas
2College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas
3Genesis Clinical Research, San Antonio, Texas
4School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
5Genesis Advanced Technologies, Inc., San Antonio, Texas
6Allergy, Asthma, Immunology, and Rheumatology Institute, San Antonio, Texas

Tóm tắt

Study ObjectivesAs better international normalized ratio (INR) control and self‐testing reduce events in warfarin‐treated patients, and vitamin K supplementation may improve INR control, our primary objective was to evaluate the effect of a system combining frequent INR self‐testing with online remote monitoring and management (STORM2) and low‐dose vitamin K supplementation on INR control; our secondary objectives were to assess the impact of STORM2 on clinician time and to evaluate the influence of pharmacogenomics on INR stability and warfarin dose after vitamin K supplementation.DesignProspective pre‐ and postintervention study.SettingFreestanding clinical research center.PatientsFifty‐five patients treated with long‐term warfarin therapy who were referred from four anticoagulation clinics and seven medical practices.InterventionAll patients performed weekly INR self‐testing and received vitamin K 100 µg/day and online anticoagulation management for 1 year.Measurements and Main ResultsINR control and time required for anticoagulation management were assessed, and an analysis of warfarin dosing and INR stability by genetic polymorphism subgroup (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 [VKORC1] and cytochrome P450 2C9 isoenzyme) was performed; vitamin K product content was also analyzed. The percentage of time that the INR is within the time in therapeutic range (TTR) improved from 56% before the intervention to 81% after the intervention (p<0.0001), and time spent at extreme INR values of lower than 1.5 or higher than 5 was reduced from 3.1% to 0.4% (p=0.01). Clinician time was less than 10 minutes per four patient visits per month. Genetic polymorphisms did not correlate with INR stability or the increase in warfarin dose after vitamin K supplementation. The content of the vitamin K product, however, was only 34–76% of the labeled amount. Patients with the GG VKORC1 genotype required a higher warfarin dose than predicted by the genomic‐based dosing chart in the warfarin package insert.ConclusionThe 25% point improvement in TTR with STORM2 is a greater improvement than reported previously with other efforts to improve TTR. STORM2 required a minimum amount of clinician time. Pharmacogenomics were not predictive of improved INR control or the magnitude of the warfarin dose after vitamin K supplementation, although the content of the product was unreliable. Patients with the GG VKORC1 genotype required a higher warfarin dose than predicted by the product information. The potential clinical impact of improved INR control with this method warrants comparisons with conventionally managed warfarin and with the new oral anticoagulants.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01997.x

10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03756.x

10.1182/blood-2009-02-207928

10.1378/chest.127.5.1515

10.1001/archinte.167.3.239

10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61194-4

10.1056/NEJMoa043033

10.1056/NEJMe058022

10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.750000

10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.830232

10.1056/NEJM199507063330103

10.1016/0735-1097(96)00020-4

10.7326/0003-4819-154-7-201104050-00005

10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00006

10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.3.244

10.1093/eurheartj/ehi327

10.1592/phco.2005.25.12.1746

10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02715.x

10.1182/blood-2006-09-049262

10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02549.x

10.1016/S0076-6879(97)82128-3

Bussey HI, Impact of a new method of warfarin management on patient satisfaction, time, and cost, Pharmacotherapy

Coumadin package insert.Princeton NJ Bristol‐Myers Squibb. Available athttp://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_coumadin.pdf. Accessed July 29 2013.

10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03497.x

Harper PL, 2008, Anticoagulation self‐management using near patient testing and decision support software provided via an Internet Website improved anticoagulation control in patients on long‐term warfarin, Blood, 112, 10.1182/blood.V112.11.1278.1278

10.1160/TH09-07-0469

10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03652.x

10.1160/TH12-06-0433

Poller L, 2009, A multicentre randomized assessment of the DAWN AC computer‐assisted oral anticoagulant dosing program, Thromb Haemost, 101, 487, 10.1160/TH08-10-0664

10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03003.x

10.1056/NEJMoa1009638