Evaluating the integration hypothesis: A meta‐analysis of the ICSEY project data using two new methods

British Journal of Psychology - Tập 114 Số 4 - Trang 819-837 - 2023
Hisham M. Abu‐Rayya1,2, John W. Berry3, David L. Sam4, Dmitry Grigoryev5
1La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
3Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
4University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
5HSE University, Moscow, Russia

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe Integration Hypothesis states that acculturating migrants who adopt the integration strategy (i.e. being doubly engaged, in both their heritage culture and in the larger national society) will have better psychological and socio‐cultural adaptation than those who adopt any other strategy (Assimilation, Separation or Marginalization). This hypothesis was supported in the original evaluation of the ICSEY project data, using the mean adaptation scores for individuals in the four acculturation clusters. This conclusion was further supported by an analysis that used scores that were derived from the two underlying dimensions. This paper further evaluates this hypothesis meta‐analytically using two new methods: Cultural Involvement and Cultural Preference; and Euclidean Distance. The results showed that these two methods provided support for the integration hypothesis, for both psychological adaptation and socio‐cultural adaptation. The pattern of relationships was stronger for positive than for negative indicators of adaptation. Theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/0022022116685846

10.1177/13684302211019471

10.4324/9780415963589-3

10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154

10.1177/0022022119861151

Berry J. W., 1980, Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings, 9

10.1080/026999497378467

10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013

10.1017/9781316875032

Berry J. W., 2018, Socio‐economic environment and human psychology, 3

10.3390/soc12060181

10.1111/apps.12332

10.1111/j.1464‐0597.2006.00256.x

10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.11.007

10.1177/09567976211006432

10.1007/s12134‐018‐0554‐4

10.1080/00207599408246532

10.1080/17475759.2017.1386122

10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.12.003

10.31234/osf.io/gf56y

10.1080/01434632.2016.1268145

10.1007/978-1-4614-6735-9_11

10.1080/1369183X.2011.623617

10.1177/1948550617728993

10.1002/ejsp.2079

Möllering A., 2014, The challenges of diaspora migration: Interdisciplinary perspectives on Israel and Germany, 83

10.1177/0022022111435097

10.1037/0022‐3514.90.5.751

10.1037/1089‐2680.7.1.3

Rudmin F. W.(2008).Book review: Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation identity and adaptation across national contexts. InJ. W.Berry J. S.Phinney D. L.Sam &P.Vedder(Eds.) (Vol.2006 336).Lawrence Erlbaumpp. ISBN 0‐80‐585156‐9. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology 39(2) 230–233.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107313860

Safa M. D., 2021, Advances in child development and behavior, 73

10.1017/CBO9781316219218

10.1017/9781108675475.003

10.1177/00220221221109939

10.1037/a0019330

10.1037/a0012818

Stogianni M. Bender M. Sleegers W. W. A. Benet‐Martinez V. &Nguyen A.(2021).Sample characteristics and country level indicators influencing the relationship between biculturalism and adjustment:An updated meta‐analysis. Unpublished Manuscripthttps://psyarxiv.com/8qymv/

10.1016/0147‐1767(80)90010‐3

10.1111/ijsw.12079

10.4324/9780415963619-3

10.18637/jss.v036.i03

Webb P. W., 2005, Essential epidemiology: An introduction for students and health professionals

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

British Journal of Psychology

Tập 114 Số 4

819-837

Thông tin tác giả