Evaluating the Use of RTI to Identify SLD: A Survey of State Policy, Procedures, Data Collection, and Administrator Perceptions
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Al Otaiba, S., Wagner, R. K., & Miller, B. (2014). Waiting to fail” redux: understanding inadequate response to intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37, 129–133. doi: 10.1177/0731948714525622 .
Bender, W. N. (2009). Beyond the RTI pyramid: implementation issues for the first five years. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
Bender, W. N., & Shores, C. (2007). Response to intervention: a practical guide for every teacher. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Peaster, L. G., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: a snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85–95. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326214 .
Bradley, R., Danielson, L., & Doolittle, J. (2005). Response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 485–486. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380060201 .
Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2006). Using response to intervention to assess learning disabilities: introduction to the special series. Assessment For Effective Intervention, 32, 3–5. doi: 10.1177/15345084060320010201 .
Burns, M. K., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2005). Questions about responsiveness-to-intervention implementation: seeking answers from existing models. California School Psychologist, 10, 9–20.
Burns, M. K., Jacob, S., & Wagner, A. R. (2008). Ethical and legal issues associated with using response-to-intervention to assess learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 263–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.001 .
Castillo, J. M., & Batsche, G. M. (2012). Scaling up response to intervention: the influence of policy and research and the role of program evaluation. Communiqué, 40(8), 14–16.
Catts, H. W., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Bridges, M. S., & Mendoza, K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163–176. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326219 .
Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). (2008). CEC’s position on response to intervention (RTI): the unique role of special education and special educators. http://www.cec.sped.org/~/media/Files/Policy/CEC%20Professional%20Policies%20and%20Positions/RTI.pdf .
East, B. (2006). Myths about response to intervention (RTI) implementation (RTI Action Network). http://www.rtinetwork.orgLearnmAVhat/ar/MythsAboutRTl .
Etscheidt, S. (2013). “Truly disabled?”: an analysis of LD eligibility issues under the individuals with disabilities education Act. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Advance online publication.. doi: 10.1177/1044207312453323 .
Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 30–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x .
Fuchs, D., & Deshler, D. D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn’t be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 129–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x .
Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: a unifying concept for re-conceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204–219.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 89, 14–20.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2009). On the importance of a unified model of responsiveness to intervention. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 41–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00074 .
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2012). Smart RTI: a next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78, 263–279. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800301 .
Gersten, R., & Dimino, J. (2006). RTI: rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 99–108. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.41.1.5 .
Hauerwas, L. B., Brown, R., & Scott, A. N. (2013). Specific learning disability and response to intervention: state-level guidance. Exceptional Children, 80, 101–120.
Hoover, J. J., Baca, L. M., Wexler-Love, E., & Saenz, L. (2008). National implementation of response to intervention (RTI): research summary. Boulder: University of Colorado, BUENO Center. http://www.nasdse.org/Portals/0/NationalImplementationofRTIResearchSummary.pdf .
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. (2004). (IDEIA). Pub.L.No.108- 446, 118 Stat. 2647 ([Amending 20 U.S.C. § § 1400 et seq.]).
Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2007). Response to intervention at school: the science and practice of assessment and intervention. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 3–9). New York: Springer.
Kauffman, J. M. (2004). The president’s commission and the devaluation of special education. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 307–324.
Kavale, K. A., & Spaulding, L. S. (2008). Is response-to-intervention good policy for specific learning disability? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(4), 169–179.
Kavale, K., Kauffman, J., Bachmeir, R., & LeFever, G. (2008). Response-to- intervention: separating the rhetoric of self-congratulation from the reality of specific learning disability identification. Learning Disability Quarterly., 31, 135–150. doi: 10.2307/25474644 .
Keller-Margulis, M. A. (2012). Fidelity of implementation framework: a critical need for response to intervention models of service delivery. Psychology in the Schools, 49(4), 342–352.
Kovaleski, J. F. (2007). Potential pitfalls of response to intervention. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: the science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 80–92). New York: Springer.
Lemons, C. J., Key, P. F. A., Fuchs, D., Yoder, P. J., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., & Bouton, B. (2010). Predicting reading growth with event-related potentials: thinking differently about indexing “responsiveness.”. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.11.006 .
Lyon, G. R. (1995). Research initiatives in learning disabilities: contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Journal of Child Neurology, 10(suppl.1), S120–S126.
Martin, J. L. (2012). Legal implications of response to intervention and special education identification (RTI Action network). http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/ld/legal-implications-of-response-to-intervention-and-special-education-identification .
Mastropieri, M., & Scruggs, T. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 525–531.
McKenzie, R. G. (2009). Obscuring vital distinctions: the oversimplification of learning disabilities within response-to-intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 203–215. doi: 10.2307/27740373 .
McLeskey, J., Landers, E., Hoppey, D., & Williamson, P. (2011). Learning disabilities and the LRE mandate. An examination of national and state trends. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26(2), 60–66.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2010). Model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services. doi: http://www.nasponline.org/standards/2010standards/2_PracticeModel.pdf .
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2015a). Meet the directors. doi: http://www.nasdse.org/MeettheDirectors/tabid/60/Default.aspx .
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2015b). NASDSE goals. http://www.nasdse.org/AboutNASDSE/MissionStatement/tabid/558/Default.aspx .
Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). (2011). Memorandum to state directors of special education (56 IDELR 50).
Pudelski, S. (2012). Will RTI litigation risks lead to a return to the special education status quo? (American Association of School Administrators Policy Insider). http://www.aasa.org/uploadedFiles/Policy_and_Advocacy/February2012-Policy-Insider.pdf .
Reynolds, C. R., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2009). Response to intervention: ready or not? or, from wait-to-fail to watch-them-fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 130–145. doi: 10.1037/a0016158 .
Riley-Tillman, T. C., Burns, M. K., & Gibbons, K. (2013). Advanced RTI applications, volume 2: assessment, design, analysis and decision making. New York: Guilford.
Source America. (2015). Regional offices. doi: http://www.sourceamerica.org/about-us/office .
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: the promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146.
Werts, M. G., Lambert, M., & Carpenter, E. (2009). What special education directors say about RTI. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 245–254. doi: 10.2307/27740376 .
Wiener, R. M., & Soodak, L. C. (2008). Special education administrators’ perspectives on response to intervention. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 21, 39–45.
Yell, M. L., & Walker, D. W. (2010). The legal basis of response to intervention: analysis and implications. Exceptionality, 18, 124–137. doi: 10.1080/09362835.2010.491741 .
Yell, M., Katsiyannis, A., & Collins, J. C. (2010). Compton unified school district v. Starvenia Addison: child find activities and response to intervention. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(2), 67–69.
Ysseldyke, J. E. (2005). Assessment and decision making for students with learning disabilities: what if this is as good as it gets? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 125–128. doi: 10.2307/1593610 .
Zirkel, P. (2012). The legal dimension of RTI: part II—state laws and guidelines (RTI action network). http://rtinetwork.org/learn/ld/the-legal-dimension-of-rti-part-i-the-basic-building-blocks .
Zirkel, P. A. (2013). The trend in SLD enrollments and the role of RTI. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 473–479. doi: 10.1177/0022219413495297 .
Zirkel, P. A. (2014). A collateral case of RTI requirements. Communiqué, 43(4), 4–6. http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/43/4/professional-practice.aspx .
Zirkel, P. A., & Krohn, N. (2008). RTI after IDEIA: a survey of state laws. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 71–73.