Evaluating suppliers within a self‐organized logistical network

Emerald - Tập 16 Số 1 - Trang 159-172 - 2005
FouziaOunnar1, PatrickPujo1
1Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Information et des Systèmes (LSIS), Université Paul Cézanne, Marseille Cedex, France

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis research paper proposes that the conduct of supplier relationships can be improved through a “self‐organized logistical network”.Design/methodology/approachAn analysis has been conducted on logistical supply chain which ensures to define a self‐organized logistical network. In such a network, each supplier can evaluate its own performance by using a decision‐making method involving multiple criteria. Indeed, such method is therefore recommended to reach a satisfactory solution. For that, a typology of performance was proposed and a multiple criteria method was chosen. Indeed, among several methods available, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method has been chosen.FindingsThe paper suggests quantifying an evaluation of each potential supplier who responds to a call for proposal from a customer, according to rules and criteria that are impartial and common to all. The process enables the emergence of the “best” supplier. The proposed approach allows a balance to be achieved between load and capacity at the supplier level, and produces a smoothing of the load curve among the various suppliers with the long‐term objective of establishing a fair system among the suppliers on the network. Our approach suggests a customer‐supplier (C‐S) relationship control where all entities C‐S partners, communicate and negotiate to respond as best as possible to the customers requirements. To each supplier, we associate a decision‐making centre through which he can self evaluate his performance in order to be able to take part to negotiations within a self organized logistical network.Originality/valueThe research focuses particularly on the study of the decision‐making centre.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arsac, J. (1970), Les Sciences Informatique, Dunod, Paris.

Beamon, B. (1998), “Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 55 No. 3, pp. 281‐94.

Belton, V. and Elder, M. (1992), “Can multiple criteria methods help production scheduling?”, paper presented at 10th international conference on M.C.D.M TAIPEI, pp. 341‐9.

Berrah, L. (1997), Une approche d'évaluation de la performance industrielle, modèle d'indicateur et techniques floues pour un pilotage réactif, Thèse de Doctorat en Génie Industriel, Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble.

Cavory, G., Frayret, J.‐M. and D'Amours, S. (2000), “Conception des réseaux logistiques: Mesure de fiabilité et Planification d'Accélérateurs”, 3ème Rencontres Internationales de la Recherche en Logistique.

Croxton, K.L., Garcia‐Dastugue, S.J., Lambert, D.M. and Rogers, D.S. (2001), “The supply chain management processes”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 13‐34.

D'Amours, S., Jabiri, A. and Boucher, S. (2001), “Les processus de Sélection, de Certification et d'Evaluation de la Performance des Fournisseurs au sein des Entreprises de Classe Mondiale”, 4e Congrès International franco‐québécois de Génie Industriel, pp. 875‐87.

Deckro, R.F., Herbert, J.E. and Winkofsky, E.P. (1982), “Multiple criteria job‐shop scheduling”, Computer & operational research, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 279‐385.

Dumoulin, R., Meschi, P.‐X. and Uhlig, T. (2000), “Socialisation, Contrôle et Performance dans les Réseaux d'Alliances Logistiques”, 3ème Rencontres Internationales de la Recherche en Logistique.

Fortuin, L. (1988), “Performance indicators – why, where and how ?”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 1‐9.

Gravel, M., Martel, J.‐M., Nadeau, R., Price, W. and Trembly, R. (1992), “A multicriterion view of optimal resource allocation in job‐shop production”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 61, pp. 230‐44.

Haase, R. (1997), “Building a generic user agent for multi‐agent integrated entreprise”, Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences, Université de Toronto.

Holmström, J., Främling, K., Tuomi, J., Kärkkäinen, M. and Ala‐Risku, T. (2002), “Implementing collaboration process networks”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 39‐50.

Johannessen, S. and Solem, O. (2002), “Logistics organizations: ideologies, principles and practice”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 31‐42.

Kolb, F. (1972), La Logistique: Approvisionnement, Production, Distribution, Edition Dunod, Paris.

Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H. and Wallenius, J. (1992), “Multiple criteria decision support a review”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 63, pp. 361‐75.

Lancioni, R., Smith, M. and Oliva, T. (2000), “The role of the internet in supply chain management”, Industrial Marketing Management, pp. 45‐56.

Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N. and Deshmukh, S.G. (2002), “A multi‐criteria group decision making model for supplier rating”, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, pp. 22‐33.

Narasimhan, R. (1983), “An analytic approach to supplier selection”, Journal of supply chain management, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 27‐32.

Ounnar, F. (1999), Prise en compte des aspects décision dans la modélisation par réseaux de Petri des systèmes flexibles de production, Thèse Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble.

Ounnar, F. and Ladet, P. (1999), “Managing breakdowns machines: a Petri net model and decision making process”, European Journal of Automation, Ed. Hermès: Modelling of reactive systems, Vol. 33 Nos 8/9, pp. 977‐94.

Ounnar, F. and Pujo, P. (2001), “Décentralisation des mécanismes de pilotage de la relation donneurs d'ordres/fournisseurs”, 4e Congrès International de Génie Industriel, Vol. 2, pp. 1175‐85.

Parunak, V. and VanderBok, R. (1998), “Modeling the extended supply network”, paper presented at the ISA‐Tech'98, Houston.

Poirier, C. and Reiter, S. (1996), La Supply Chain, Optimiser la Chaîne Logistique et le réseau interentreprises, Dunod, Paris.

Pomerol, J.‐C. and Barba‐Romero, S. (1993), Choix multicritère dans l'entreprise, Collection Informatique, Hermès, Paris.

Pujo, P. and Brun‐Picard, D. (2002), “Pilotage sans création de plan prévisionnel, ni d'ordonnancement préalable, Chapitre 4”, Méthodes du Pilotage des Systèmes de Production, pp. 130‐62, Collection IC2.

Roy, B. (1985), Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision, Economica.

Roy, B. and Bouyssou, D. (1993), Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas, Gestion Economica.

Saaty, T‐L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Shin, H., Collier, D. and Wilson, D. (2000), “Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance”, Journal of Operation Management, Vol. 18, pp. 317‐33.

Simatupang, T.M. and Sridharan, R. (2002), “The collaborative supply chain”, The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 15‐30.

Stalk, G. and Hout, T. (1990), Competing Against Time: How Time‐Based Competition is Reshaping Global Markets, The Free Press, New York, NY.

Tabucanon, M.T. (1988), “Multiple criteria decision making in industry”, Studies in Production and Engineering Economics, 8, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Tan, K.C., Kannan, V.R. and Handfield, R.B. (1998), “Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 2‐9.

Vargas, L.G. (1990), “An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications”, European Journal of Operational Research, No. 48, pp. 2‐8.

Vokurka, R.J., Choobineh, J. and Vadi, L. (1996), “A prototype expert system for the evaluation and selection of potential suppliers”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 16 No. 12, pp. 106‐27.

Wedley, W.C. (1990), “Combining qualitative and quantitative factors – an analytic hierarchy approach”, Socio Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 57‐64.

Womack, J., Jones, D. and Roos, D. (1990), The Machine that Changed the World, Rawson Ass., New York, NY.

Zeleny, M. (1982), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.