Ethical deliberations about involuntary treatment: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists
Tóm tắt
Involuntary treatment is a key issue in healthcare ethics. In this study, ethical issues relating to involuntary psychiatric treatment are investigated through interviews with Swedish psychiatrists. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight Swedish psychiatrists, focusing on their experiences of and views on compulsory treatment. In relation to this, issues about patient autonomy were also discussed. The interviews were analysed using a descriptive qualitative approach. The answers focus on two main aspects of compulsory treatment. Firstly, deliberations about when and why it was justifiable to make a decision on involuntary treatment in a specific case. Here the cons and pros of ordering compulsory treatment were discussed, with particular emphasis on the consequences of providing treatment vs. refraining from ordering treatment. Secondly, a number of issues relating to background factors affecting decisions for or against involuntary treatment were also discussed. These included issues about the Swedish Mental Care Act, healthcare organisation and the care environment. Involuntary treatment was generally seen as an unwanted exception to standard care. The respondents’ judgments about involuntary treatment were typically in line with Swedish law on the subject. However, it was also argued that the law leaves room for individual judgments when making decisions about involuntary treatment. Much of the reasoning focused on the consequences of ordering involuntary treatment, where risk of harm to the therapeutic alliance was weighed against the assumed good consequences of ensuring that patients received needed treatment. Cases concerning suicidal patients and psychotic patients who did not realise their need for care were typically held as paradigmatic examples of justified involuntary care. However, there was an ambivalence regarding the issue of suicide as it was also argued that risk of suicide in itself might not be sufficient for justified involuntary care. It was moreover argued that organisational factors sometimes led to decisions about compulsory treatment that could have been avoided, given a more patient-oriented healthcare organisation.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Tännsjö T. Coercive care: the ethics of choice in health and medicine. London, New York: Routledge; 1999.
Sjöstrand M, Eriksson S, Juth N, Helgesson G. Paternalism in the name of autonomy. J Med Philos. 2013;38(6):710–24.
Matthews E. Autonomy and the psychiatric patient. J Appl Philos. 2000;17(1):59–70.
Zinkler M, Priebe S. Detention of the mentally ill in Europe–a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;106(1):3–8.
Testa M, West SG. Civil commitment in the United States. Psychiatry. 2010;7(10):30–40.
Fistein EC, Holland AJ, Clare IC, Gunn MJ. A comparison of mental health legislation from diverse Commonwealth jurisdictions. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009;32(3):147–55.
Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(25):1635–8.
Owen GS, Szmukler G, Richardson G, David AS, Raymont V, Freyenhagen F, et al. Decision-making capacity for treatment in psychiatric and medical in-patients: cross-sectional, comparative study. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203(6):461–7.
Owen GS, Richardson G, David AS, Szmukler G, Hayward P, Hotopf M. Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2008;337:a448.
Lapid MI, Rummans TA, Poole KL, Pankratz VS, Maurer MS, Rasmussen KG, et al. Decisional capacity of severely depressed patients requiring electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT. 2003;19(2):67–72.
Dawson J, Szmukler G. Fusion of mental health and incapacity legislation. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. 2006;188:504–9.
Callaghan S, Ryan C, Kerridge I. Risk of suicide is insufficient warrant for coercive treatment for mental illness. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013;36(5–6):374–85.
Doyal L, Sheather J. Mental health legislation should respect decision making capacity. BMJ. 2005;331(7530):1467–9.
Large MM, Ryan CJ, Nielssen OB, Hayes RA. The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(12):877–81.
Widdershoven G, Berghmans R. Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approach. J Med Ethics. 2001;27(2):92–7.
Kemp K, Zelle H, Bonnie RJ. Embedding advance directives in routine care for persons with serious mental illness: implementation challenges. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(1):10–4.
Appelbaum PS. Commentary: psychiatric advance directives at a crossroads–when can PADs be overridden? J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(3):395–7.
Appelbaum PS. Law & psychiatry: psychiatric advance directives and the treatment of committed patients. Psychiatr Serv. 2004;55(7):751–2. 7.
Kjellin L, Wallsten T. Accumulated coercion and short-term outcome of inpatient psychiatric care. BMC Psychiatr. 2010;10:53.
Katsakou C, Priebe S. Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission–a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;114(4):232–41.
Kallert TW, Katsakou C, Adamowski T, Dembinskas A, Fiorillo A, Kjellin L, et al. Coerced hospital admission and symptom change–a prospective observational multi-centre study. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(11), e28191.
Jacobsen TB. Involuntary treatment in Europe: different countries, different practices. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012;25(4):307–10.
Kjellin L, Andersson K, Bartholdson E, Candefjord IL, Holmstrom H, Jacobsson L, et al. Coercion in psychiatric care - patients’ and relatives’ experiences from four Swedish psychiatric services. Nord J Psychiatry. 2004;58(2):153–9.
Tan JO, Stewart A, Fitzpatrick R, Hope T. Attitudes of patients with anorexia nervosa to compulsory treatment and coercion. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010;33(1):13–9.
Priebe S, Katsakou C, Glockner M, Dembinskas A, Fiorillo A, Karastergiou A, et al. Patients’ views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months: prospective study in 11 European countries. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(3):179–85.
Priebe S, Katsakou C, Amos T, Leese M, Morriss R, Rose D, et al. Patients’ views and readmissions 1 year after involuntary hospitalisation. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. 2009;194(1):49–54.
Katsakou C, Rose D, Amos T, Bowers L, McCabe R, Oliver D, et al. Psychiatric patients’ views on why their involuntary hospitalisation was right or wrong: a qualitative study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012;47(7):1169–79.
Katsakou C, Bowers L, Amos T, Morriss R, Rose D, Wykes T, et al. Coercion and treatment satisfaction among involuntary patients. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(3):286–92.
Johansson IM, Lundman B. Patients’ experience of involuntary psychiatric care: good opportunities and great losses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2002;9(6):639–47.
Bindman J, Reid Y, Szmukler G, Tiller J, Thornicroft G, Leese M. Perceived coercion at admission to psychiatric hospital and engagement with follow-up–a cohort study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005;40(2):160–6.
O’Donoghue B, Roche E, Shannon S, Lyne J, Madigan K, Feeney L. Perceived coercion in voluntary hospital admission. Psychiatry Res. 2014;215(1):120–6.
Brooks RA. U.S. psychiatrists’ beliefs and wants about involuntary civil commitment grounds. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006;29(1):13–21.
Diseth RR, Bogwald KP, Hoglend PA. Attitudes among stakeholders towards compulsory mental health care in Norway. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011;34(1):1–6.
Kullgren G, Jacobsson L, Lynoe N, Kohn R, Levav I. Practices and attitudes among Swedish psychiatrists regarding the ethics of compulsory treatment. Med Law. 1997;16(3):499–507.
Feiring E, Ugstad KN. Interpretations of legal criteria for involuntary psychiatric admission: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:500.
SFS 2004. 168 Smittskyddslag. Stockholm: The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; 2004:168.
SFS 1991. 1128 Lag om Psykiatrisk Tvångsvård. Stockholm: The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs; 1991:1128.
SOSFS 2008:18 Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter och allmänna råd om psykiatrisk tvångsvård och rättspsykiatrisk vård. The National Board of Health and Welfare: Stockholm; 2008:18.
SOSFS 2011. 7 Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter och allmänna råd om livsuppehållande behandling. The National Board of Health and Welfare: Stockholm; 2011:7.
Tansey O, iacute. Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling. PS: Polit Sci Politics. 2007;40(04):765–72.
Sjöstrand M, Karlsson P, Sandman L, Helgesson G, Eriksson S, Juth N. Conceptions of Decision-Making Capacity in Psychiatry: Interviews with Swedish Psychiatrists. 2015; doi10.1186/s12910-015-0026-8.
Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–40.
Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–8.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12.
Werth JL Jr, Cobia DC. Empirically based criteria for rational suicide: a survey of psychotherapists. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1995;25(2):231–40.
Owen GS, David AS, Hayward P, Richardson G, Szmukler G, Hotopf M. Retrospective views of psychiatric in-patients regaining mental capacity. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(5):403–7.
Sjöstrand M, Juth N. Authenticity and psychiatric disorder: does autonomy of personal preferences matter? Med Health Care Philos. 2014;17(1):115–22.
Wessel M, Lynöe N, Juth N, Helgesson G. Bad apples or bad barrels? Qualitative study of negative experiences of encounters in healthcare. Clin Ethics. 2014;9(2–3):77–86.