Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Biobanks for Genetics Research

Advances in Genetics - Tập 60 - Trang 505-544 - 2008
Susanne B. Haga1, Laura M. Beskow1
1Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Center for Genome Ethics, Law, and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbott, 1999, Sweden sets ethical standards for use of genetic ‘biobanks’, Nature, 400, 3, 10.1038/21720 Abbott, 2006, Genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in the Polynesian population of Niue Island, Hum. Biol., 78, 131, 10.1353/hub.2006.0031 1998 Allen, 2004, Commercial tissue repositories: HIPAA raises sponsors' fears, IRB, 5, 9, 10.2307/3563947 1996, Statement on informed consent for genetic research, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 59, 471 Amundadottir, 2006, A common variant associated with prostate cancer in European and African populations, Nat. Genet., 38, 652, 10.1038/ng1808 Anderlik, 2003, Commercial biobanks and genetic research: Ethical and legal issues, Am. J. Pharmacogenom., 3, 203, 10.2165/00129785-200303030-00006 Arnason, 2004, Coding and consent: Moral challenges of the database project in Iceland, Bioethics, 18, 27, 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00377.x Ashburn, 2000, Human tissue research in the genomic era of medicine: Balancing individual and societal interests, Arch. Intern. Med., 160, 3377, 10.1001/archinte.160.22.3377 1982 Austin, 2003, Monitoring ethical, legal, and social issues in developing population genetic databases, Genet. Med., 5, 451, 10.1097/01.GIM.0000093976.08649.1B Bauer, 2004, Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: A brief review of existing organizational policies, Theor. Med. Bioeth., 25, 113, 10.1023/B:META.0000033772.84738.ad Beskow, 2006, Considering the nature of individual research results, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 38, 10.1080/15265160600938328 Beskow, 2001, Informed consent for population‐based research involving genetics, JAMA, 286, 2315, 10.1001/jama.286.18.2315 Blatt, 2000, Banking biological collections: Data warehousing, data mining, and data dilemmas in genomics and global health policy, Commun. Genet., 3, 204, 10.1159/000051140 Bookman, 2006, Reporting genetic results in research studies: Summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group, Am. J. Med. Genet. A, 140, 1033, 10.1002/ajmg.a.31195 Bonnen, 2006, Evaluating potential for whole‐genome studies in Kosrae, an isolated population in Micronesia, Nat. Genet., 38, 214, 10.1038/ng1712 Burton, 2002, Proposed genetic database on Tongans opposed, BMJ, 324, 443, 10.1136/bmj.324.7335.443/a Cambon‐Thomsen, 2004, The social and ethical issues of post‐genomic human biobanks, Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, 866, 10.1038/nrg1473 2006 Caulfield, 2003, DNA databanks and consent: A suggested policy option involving an authorization model, BMC Med. Ethics, 4, E1, 10.1186/1472-6939-4-1 Cavalli‐Sforza, 1991, Call for a worldwide survey of human genetic diversity: A vanishing opportunity for the Human Genome Project, Genomics, 11, 490, 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90169-F Cavalli‐Sforza, 2005, The Human Genome Diversity Project: Past, present, and future, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 333, 10.1038/nrg1596 Claerhout, 2005, Privacy protection for clinical and genomic data: The use of privacy‐enhancing techniques in medicine, Int. J. Med. Inform., 74, 257, 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.03.008 Clayton, 2006, Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research, JAMA, 295, 37, 10.1001/jama.295.1.37-a Clayton, 1995, Informed consent for genetic research on stored tissue samples, JAMA, 274, 1786, 10.1001/jama.1995.03530220052033 De Moor, 2003, Privacy enhancing techniques—the key to secure communication and management of clinical and genomic data, Meth. Inf. Med., 42, 148, 10.1055/s-0038-1634326 Deschenes, 2001, Human genetic research, DNA banking and consent: A question of ‘form’?, Clin. Genet., 59, 221, 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.590403.x Dixon‐Woods, 2006, Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: Qualitative study of participants' views, BMJ, 332, 206, 10.1136/bmj.38675.677963.3A Dressler Dressler, 2006, Thresholds and boundaries in the disclosure of individual genetic research results, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 18, 10.1080/15265160600934830 Eiseman, 1999 Eiseman, 2003 Elger, 2006, Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: Differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework, EMBO Rep., 7, 661, 10.1038/sj.embor.7400740 Eriksson, 2005, Potential harms, anonymization, and the right to withdraw consent to the biobank research, Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 13, 1071, 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201458 2003, Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: Technical, social and ethical issues, Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 11, S8 Facio, 2006, One size does not fit all, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 40, 10.1080/15265160600938351 Fernandez, 2006, Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 44, 10.1080/15265160600938575 Fernandez, 2003, Informing study participants of research results: An ethical imperative, IRB, 25, 12, 10.2307/3564300 Foster, 2000, Genetic research and culturally specific risks: One size does not fit all, Trends Genet., 16, 93, 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01895-8 Foster, 2005, Will investment in biobanks, prospective cohorts, and markers of common patterns of variation benefit other populations for drug response and disease susceptibility gene discovery?, Pharmacogenom. J., 5, 75, 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500295 Foster, 1997, Communal discourse as a supplement to informed consent for genetic research, Nat. Genet., 17, 277, 10.1038/ng1197-277 Foster, 1998, A model agreement for genetic research in socially identifiable populations, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 63, 696, 10.1086/302013 Fryer‐Edwards, 2006, Relationships with test‐tubes: Where's the reciprocity?, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 36, 10.1080/15265160600938294 Gibbons, 2005, Lessons from European population genetic databases: Comparing the law in Estonia, Iceland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, Eur. J. Health Law, 12, 103, 10.1163/1571809054640659 Gonzalez‐Perez, 2006, Genetic change in the polynesian population of Easter Island: Evidence from Alu insertion polymorphisms, Ann. Hum. Genet., 70, 829, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00293.x Grant, 2006, Variant of transcription factor 7‐like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes, Nat. Genet., 38, 320, 10.1038/ng1732 Greely, 1999, Breaking the stalemate: A prospective regulatory framework for unforeseen research uses of human tissue samples and health information, Wake Forest Law Rev., 34, 737 Greenberg, 2003 Grizzle, 1999, Recommended policies for uses of human tissue in research, education, and quality control. Ad Hoc Committee on Stored Tissue, College of American Pathologists, Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med., 123, 296, 10.5858/1999-123-0296-RPFUOH Hakimian, 2004, Ownership and use of tissue specimens for research, JAMA, 292, 2500, 10.1001/jama.292.20.2500 Hansson, 2006, Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research?, Lancet Oncol., 7, 266, 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70618-0 Helgadottir, 2006, A variant of the gene encoding leukotriene A4 hydrolase confers ethnicity‐specific risk of myocardial infarction, Nat. Genet., 38, 68, 10.1038/ng1692 Hirschhorn, 2002, A comprehensive review of genetic association studies, Genet. Med., 4, 45, 10.1097/00125817-200203000-00002 Hirtzlin, 2003, An empirical survey on biobanking of human genetic material and data in six EU countries, Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 11, 475, 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201007 Hoeyer, 2005, The ethics of research using biobanks: Reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent, Arch. Intern. Med., 165, 97, 10.1001/archinte.165.1.97 Ioannidis, 2001, Replication validity of genetic association studies, Nat. Genet., 29, 306, 10.1038/ng749 Ioannidis, 2006, Implications of small effect sizes of individual genetic variants on the design and interpretation of genetic association studies of complex diseases, Am. J. Epidemiol., 164, 609, 10.1093/aje/kwj259 Jack, 2003, Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research: Review of records, BMJ, 327, 262, 10.1136/bmj.327.7409.262 Janger, 2005, Genetic information, privacy and insolvency, J. Law Med. Ethics, 33, 79, 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2005.tb00212.x Juengst, 1998, Group identity and human diversity: Keeping biology straight from culture, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 63, 673, 10.1086/302032 Juengst, 1998, Groups as gatekeepers to genomic research: Conceptually confusing, morally hazardous, and practically useless, Kennedy Inst. Ethics J., 8, 183, 10.1353/ken.1998.0010 Kaiser, 2003, African‐American population biobank proposed, Science, 300, 1485, 10.1126/science.300.5625.1485 Kaphingst, 2006, Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research, Clin. Genet., 69, 393, 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00614.x Kaye, 2006, Do we need a uniform regulatory system for biobanks across Europe?, Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 14, 245, 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201530 Knoppers, 2005, Biobanking: International norms, J. Law Med. Ethics, 33, 7, 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2005.tb00205.x Knoppers, 2005, Human genetic research: Emerging trends in ethics, Nat. Rev. Genet., 6, 75, 10.1038/nrg1505 Lin, 2004, Genomic research and human subject privacy, Science, 305, 183, 10.1126/science.1095019 Lohmueller, 2003, Meta‐analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease, Nat. Genet., 33, 177, 10.1038/ng1071 Maschke, 2005, Navigating an ethical patchwork—human gene banks, Nat. Biotechnol., 23, 539, 10.1038/nbt0505-539 Maschke, 2004, Ethical issues in tissue banking for research: The prospects and pitfalls of setting international standards, Theor. Med. Bioeth., 25, 143, 10.1023/B:META.0000033773.44765.7c McGuire, 2006, No longer de‐identified, Science, 312, 370, 10.1126/science.1125339 McGuire, 2006, Meeting the growing demands of genetic research, J. Law. Med. Ethics, 34, 809, 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00100.x Meltzer, 2006, Undesirable implications of disclosing individual genetic results to research participants, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 28, 10.1080/15265160600935811 Merz, 1997, Use of human tissues in research: Clarifying clinician and researcher roles and information flows, J. Investig. Med., 45, 252 Merz, 2004, “Iceland Inc.”? On the ethics of commercial population genomics, Soc. Sci. Med., 58, 1201, 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00256-9 1991 Muller, 2005, Variants in hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha are modestly associated with type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians, Diabetes, 54, 3035, 10.2337/diabetes.54.10.3035 2006 1979 Nilstun, 2006, Human tissue samples and ethics—attitudes of the general public in Sweden to biobank research, Med. Health Care Philos, 9, 81, 10.1007/s11019-005-7984-4 Ossorio, 2006, Letting the gene out of the bottle: A comment on returning individual research results to participants, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 24, 10.1080/15265160600935555 Parker, 2006, Rethinking respect for persons enrolled in research, ASBH Exchange, 9, 6 Parker, 2006, Best laid plans for offering results go awry, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 22, 10.1080/15265160600934913 Partridge, 2002, Informing clinical trial participants about study results, JAMA, 288, 363, 10.1001/jama.288.3.363 Peterson, 2005, Securing our genetic health: Engendering trust in UK Biobank, Sociol. Health Illn., 27, 271, 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00442.x Plummer, 2002, Making epidemiologic studies responsive to the needs of participants and communities: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study experience, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 39, 96, 10.1002/em.10045 Pritchard, 2001, Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases?, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 69, 124, 10.1086/321272 Ravitsky, 2006, Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 8, 10.1080/15265160600934772 Reilly, 1998, Rethinking risks to human subjects in genetic research, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 63, 682, 10.1086/302028 Reymond, 2002, Ethical, legal and economic issues raised by the use of human tissue in postgenomic research, Dig. Dis., 20, 257, 10.1159/000067677 Richards, 2003, Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer, J. Med. Ethics, 29, 93, 10.1136/jme.29.2.93 Rose Rose, 2003, An ethical dilemma, Nature, 425, 123, 10.1038/425123a Rose, 2006, From hype to mothballs in four years: Troubles in the development of large‐scale DNA biobanks in Europe, Commun. Genet., 9, 184, 10.1159/000092655 Rothstein, 2005, Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks, J. Law Med. Ethics, 33, 89, 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2005.tb00213.x Rothstein, 2006, Tiered disclosure options promote the autonomy and well‐being of research subjects, Am. J. Bioeth., 6, 20, 10.1080/15265160600934871 Schuklenk, 2006, North‐South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: A critical ethical and legal analysis, Develop. World Bioeth., 6, 122 Shalowitz, 2005, Disclosing individual results of clinical research: Implications of respect for participants, JAMA, 294, 737, 10.1001/jama.294.6.737 Sharp, 2000, Involving study populations in the review of genetic research, J. Law Med. Ethics, 28, 41, 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00315.x Shickle, 2006, The consent problem within DNA biobanks, Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci., 37, 503, 10.1016/j.shpsc.2006.06.007 Shickle, 2003, Public attitudes to participating in UK BioBank: A DNA bank, lifestyle and morbidity database on 500,000 members of the UK public aged 45–69, 323 Stoddart, 2002, Association of acanthosis nigricans with hyperinsulinemia compared with other selected risk factors for type 2 diabetes in Cherokee Indians: The Cherokee Diabetes Study, Diabetes Care, 25, 1009, 10.2337/diacare.25.6.1009 2004, Integrating ethics and science in the International HapMap Project, Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, 467, 10.1038/nrg1351 2004 Washington University v. Catalona, 437 F.Supp.2d 985 (E.D.Mo., 2006). Weijer, 2000, Protecting communities in biomedical research, Science, 289, 1142, 10.1126/science.289.5482.1142 Weijer, 1999, Protecting communities in research: Current guidelines and limits of extrapolation, Nat. Genet., 23, 275, 10.1038/15455 Weiss, 2002, Linkage disequilibrium and the mapping of complex human traits, Trends Genet., 18, 19, 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02550-1 Wendler, 2006, One‐time general consent for research on biological samples, BMJ, 332, 544, 10.1136/bmj.332.7540.544 Wendler, 2006, One‐time general consent for research on biological samples: Is it compatible with the health insurance portability and accountability act?, Arch. Intern. Med., 166, 1449, 10.1001/archinte.166.14.1449 Winickoff, 2003, Governing population genomics: Law, bioethics, and biopolitics in three case studies, Jurimetrics, 43, 187 Wolf, 2004, Untapped potential: IRB guidance for the ethical research use of stored biological materials, IRB, 26, 1, 10.2307/3563696 2003 Zlotnik Shaul, 2005, Dissemination to research subjects: Operationalizing investigator accountability, Account Res., 12, 1, 10.1080/08989620590918899 1997 2000 2000