Estimation of the multiple testing burden for genomewide association studies of nearly all common variants

Genetic Epidemiology - Tập 32 Số 4 - Trang 381-385 - 2008
Itsik Pe’er1, Roman Yelensky2,3,4, David Green5,2,6,3,7, Mark J. Daly2,8,7
1Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York
2Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
3Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
4Harvard-M.I.T. Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
5Broad Institute of M.I.T. and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
6Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
7Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
8Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Genomewide association studies are an exciting strategy in genetics, recently becoming feasible and harvesting many novel genes linked to multiple phenotypes. Determining the significance of results in the face of testing a genomewide set of multiple hypotheses, most of which are producing noisy, null‐distributed association signals, presents a challenge to the wide community of association researchers. Rather than each study engaging in independent evaluation of significance standards, we have undertaken the task of developing such standards for genomewide significance, based on data collected by the International Haplotype Map Consortium. We report an estimated testing burden of a million independent tests genomewide in Europeans, and twice that number in Africans. We further identify the sensitivity of the testing burden to the required significance level, with implications to staged design of association studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/ng1790

10.1038/ng1801

10.1038/nature05874

10.1038/ng1669

10.1086/504527

10.1086/423738

Hirschhorn JN, 2005, Genome‐wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits, Nat Rev, 6, 95, 10.1038/nrg1521

10.1126/science.1109557

10.1086/301792

10.1038/ng1195-241

10.1038/ng1457

Pe'er I, 2006, Biases and reconciliation in estimations of linkage disequilibriumin the human genome, Am J Hum Genet, 73

Pe'er I, 2006, Evaluating and Improving Power in Whole Genome Association Studies using Fixed Marker Sets, Nat Genet, 38, 10.1038/ng1816

10.1126/science.273.5281.1516

10.1126/science.1142358

10.1126/science.1142382

10.2307/2283989

10.1038/ng1706

Tavare S, 1997, Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data, Genetics, 145, 505, 10.1093/genetics/145.2.505

10.1038/nature02168

10.1038/nature04226

10.1002/gepi.20047

10.1038/nature05911

10.1126/science.1142364