Estimation of disease prevalence, true positive rate, and false positive rate of two screening tests when disease verification is applied on only screen-positives: A hierarchical model using multi-center data

Cancer Epidemiology - Tập 36 - Trang 153-160 - 2012
Eileen M. Stock1,2,3, James D. Stamey2, Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan4, Dean M. Young2, Richard Muwonge4, Marc Arbyn5
1Department of Statistical Science, P.O. Box 97140, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798-7140, USA
2Department of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
3Center for Applied Health Research, Scott & White Healthcare System, Temple, TX 76502, USA
4Screening Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
5Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium

Tài liệu tham khảo

Berry, 2002, Analytic methods for comparing two dichotomous screening or diagnostic tests applied to two populations of differing disease prevalence when individuals negative on both tests are unverified, Stat Med, 21, 853, 10.1002/sim.1066

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Iarc cancerbase no. 10 [internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008. Available from http://globocan.iarc.fr.

Arbyn M, Gaffikin L, Sankaranarayanan R, Muwonge R, Keita N, Wesley R, et al. Assessment of innovative approaches to cervical cancer screening, follow-up and treatment of screen detected cervical lesions in developing countries: A pooled analysis of accp study results. IPH/EPI REPORTS, 2006. 2008

Arbyn, 2008, Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India, Int J Cancer, 123, 153, 10.1002/ijc.23489

Katz, 2006, Preventing cervical cancer in the developing world, N Engl J Med, 354, 1110, 10.1056/NEJMp068031

Chen, 2010, Estimating key parameters in periodic breast cancer screening—application to the Canadian national breast screening study data, Cancer Epidemiol, 34, 429, 10.1016/j.canep.2010.04.001

Martinez, 2008, Bayesian estimation of performance measures of cervical cancer screening tests in the presence of covariates and absence of a gold standard, Cancer Inform, 6, 33, 10.1177/117693510800600002

Zhou, 1998, Comparing accuracies of two screening tests in a two-phase study for dementia, J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat), 47, 135, 10.1111/1467-9876.00102

MacNab, 2003, Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of spatially correlated health service outcome and utilization rates, Biometrics, 59, 305, 10.1111/1541-0420.00037

Dendukuri, 2001, Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests, Biometrics, 57, 158, 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00158.x

Arbyn, 2009, How to evaluate emerging technologies in cervical cancer screening?, Int J Cancer, 125, 2489, 10.1002/ijc.24774