Estimating Causal Installed-Base Effects: A Bias-Correction Approach
Tóm tắt
New empirical models of consumer demand that incorporate social effects seek to measure the causal effect of past adopter's behavior—the “installed-base”—on current adoption behavior. Identifying such causal effects is challenging due to several alternative confounds that generate correlation in agents' actions. In the absence of experimental variation, a preferred solution has been to control for these spurious correlations using a rich specification of fixed effects. The authors show that fixed-effects estimators of this sort are inconsistent in the presence of installed-base effects; in simulations, random-effects specifications perform even worse. The analysis reveals the tension the applied empiricist faces in this area: a rich control for unobservables increases the credibility of the reported causal effects, but the incorporation of these controls introduces biases of a new kind in this class of models. The authors present two solutions: a modified version of an instrumental variable approach and a new bias-correction approach, both of which deliver consistent estimates of causal installed-base effects. The empirical application to the adoption of the Toyota Prius Hybrid in California shows evidence for social influence in diffusion and reveals that implementing the bias correction reverses the sign of the measured installed-base effect. The authors also discuss implications of the results for identification of models in marketing involving state dependence in demand, and incorporating discrete games of strategic interaction.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson Erlin B., 1970, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 32, 283, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00842.x
Arellano Manuel, 2007, Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Ninth World Congress, 381
BajariPatrick, FoxJeremy, KimKyoo il, and RyanStephen (2010), “Simple Nonparametric Estimator for the Distribution of Random Coefficients,” NBER Working Paper No. 15210.
BarryKeith (2009), “Ford Bets the Fiesta on Social Networking,” Wired, (April 17), (accessed September 6, 2012), [available at http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/04/how-the-fiesta/].
Bollinger B., 2011, “Peer Effects and Learning-by-Doing in the Diffusion of Solar,”
Bun Maurice J.G., 2005, “Bias-Corrected Estimation in Dynamic Panel Data Models with Heteroskedasticity,”
EllicksonPaul, HoughtonStephanie, and TimminsChristopher (2010), “Estimating Network Economies in Retail Chains: A Revealed Preference Approach,” NBER Working Paper No. 15832.
Gallant A. Ronald, 2010, “Dynamic Entry with Cross Product Spillovers: An Application to the Generic Drug Industry,”
Greene William H., 1997, Econometric Analysis
Heckman James J., 1991, American Economic Review, 81, 75
McShane Blakely, 2010, “Multivariate Visual Diffusion for Social Groups: How Social Identity Influences When and What People Buy,”
Orhun A. Yeşim, 2012, Quantitative Marketing and Economics
Shriver Scott K., 2010, “Network Effects in Alternative Fuel Adoption: Empirical Analysis of the Market for Ethanol,”
TaylorAlexIII (2006), “The Birth of the Prius,” CNNMoney.com, (February 24), (accessed September 6, 2012), [available at http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/03/06/8370702/].