Epigenetic Epidemiology: The Rebirth of Soft Inheritance

Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism - Tập 58 Số Suppl. 2 - Trang 8-15 - 2011
Mark A. Hanson1, Felicia M. Low2, Peter D. Gluckman2
1Institute of Developmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
2Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Tóm tắt

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, constitute the main cause of death worldwide. Eighty percent of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, especially as these countries undergo socio-economic improvement following reductions in the burden of infectious disease. The World Health Organization predicts a substantial increase in the incidence of NCDs over the next decade globally. NCDs are generally preventable, but current approaches are clearly inadequate. New initiatives are needed to implement such prevention, and there needs to be greater recognition that early-life interventions are likely to be the most efficacious. Devising appropriate prevention strategies necessitates an understanding of how the developmental environment influences risk. Progress in this field has been slow due to an excessive emphasis on fixed genomic variations (hard inheritance) as the major determinants of disease susceptibility. However, new evidence demonstrates the much greater importance of early-life developmental factors, involving epigenetic processes and ‘soft’ inheritance in modulating an individual’s vulnerability to NCD. This also offers opportunities for novel epigenetic biomarkers of risk or interventions targeting epigenetic pathways to be devised for use in early life. This may pave the way to much more effective, customised interventions to promote health across the life course.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1056%2FNEJMp1002024

10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020133

10.1001%2Fjama.291.21.2616

10.1016%2F0026-0495%2895%2990311-9

10.1038%2Fnature08494

10.1016%2Fj.tree.2005.08.001

10.1161%2F01.ATV.0000228819.13039.b8

10.1017%2FS2040174409990171

10.1016%2Fj.tem.2009.12.008

10.1136%2Fbmj.298.6673.564

10.1056%2FNEJMp068177

10.1203%2FPDR.0b013e3182055ede

10.2337%2Fdc09-2343

10.1677%2FJME-08-0025

10.2353%2Fajpath.2010.090031

10.1016%2Fj.siny.2004.03.001

10.1159%2F000115337

10.1210%2Fjc.2010-0697

10.1002%2Fbies.20522

10.1038%2Fnn1276

10.1016%2Fj.molmed.2009.11.003

10.1007%2Fs00335-008-9136-7

10.1016%2Fj.mito.2009.09.006

10.1159%2F000328042

10.1159%2F000328040

10.2337%2Fdb10-0979

10.1210%2Fen.2005-0581

10.1210%2Fen.2005-0748

10.1073%2Fpnas.0705667104

10.1093%2Fije%2Fdyn015

10.1038%2Fnrendo.2009.102

10.1136%2Fbmj.b481

10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2807%2960524-8

10.1001%2Farchpsyc.65.5.578