Enterprise Risk Management Program Quality: Determinants, Value Relevance, and the Financial Crisis

Contemporary Accounting Research - Tập 30 Số 4 - Trang 1264-1295 - 2013
Ryan J. Baxter1, Jean C. Bedard2, Rani Hoitash1, Ari Yezegel1
1Bentley University
2Bentley University University of New South Wales

Tóm tắt

This paper investigates factors associated with high‐quality Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) programs in financial services firms, and whether ERM quality enhances performance and signals credibility to the financial markets. ERM, developed with the assistance of the accounting profession, provides a framework and plan to integrate management of all sources of risk. Challenged by measurement difficulties common to research on management control systems, prior ERM studies present mixed findings. Using ERM quality ratings of financial companies by Standard & Poor's, we find that higher ERM quality is associated with greater complexity, less resource constraint, and better corporate governance. Controlling for such characteristics, we find that higher ERM quality is associated with improved accounting performance. Results show a market reaction to signals of enhanced management control from initial ERM quality ratings and rating revisions, and a stronger response to earnings surprises for firms with higher ERM quality. Focusing on the recent global financial crisis, our analysis suggests that there is no relation between ERM quality and market performance prior to and during the market collapse. However, returns of higher ERM quality companies are higher during the market rebound. Overall, results reveal that firm performance and value are enhanced by high‐quality controls that integrate risk management efforts across the firm, enabling better oversight of managers' risk‐taking behavior and aligning that behavior with the strategic direction of the company.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69

Anderson K. L. andT. L. Yohn.2002.The effect of 10K restatements on firm value information asymmetries and investors' reliance on earnings. Working paper Georgetown University.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=332380.

10.1111/1540-6261.00567

10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.001

10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217

10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.02.003

10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.71

10.1016/0304-405X(83)90031-4

Beasley M. S., 1996, An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud, The Accounting Review, 71, 443

Beasley M. S., 2009, Report on the current state of enterprise risk oversight

10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.10.001

10.1177/0148558X0802300303

10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.13

10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.665

10.1016/0304-405X(94)00798-6

Bhagat S., 2001, The non‐correlation between board independence and long‐term firm performance, Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb03952.x

10.2139/ssrn.941179

10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00027-1

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 1992, COSO report: Internal control – An integrated framework

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2004, Executive summary: Enterprise risk management ‐ Integrated framework

10.1016/0304-405X(89)90064-0

10.2308/accr.2005.80.4.1039

10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.907

10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00166.x

10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.10.003

10.2308/accr.00000010

10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5

10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00896-3

10.1086/467037

10.2308/accr.2002.77.3.515

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05123.x

Gaskel G., 2007, Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America and Guardian Insurance & Annuity Co. Standard and Poor's Ratings Report

10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.06.006

10.1506/5XW7-9CY6-LLJY-BA2F

10.1007/s11142-007-9046-z

Heckman J, 1976, The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475

10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.839

10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x

10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00026-X

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x

10.1111/1098-1616.00020

10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9

10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.649

10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.963

10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004

10.1111/1098-1616.00019

10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00290.x

10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C

10.1177/0148558X11409160

10.1111/j.1745-6622.2006.00106.x

Pagach D. andR.Warr.2007.An empirical investigation of the characteristics of firms adopting enterprise risk management. Working paper North Carolina State University.

Pagach D. andR.Warr.2008.The effects of enterprise risk management on firm performance. Working Paper North Carolina State University.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1155218.

10.2307/2490543

10.2308/accr.2009.84.4.1255

10.1016/0304-405X(90)90002-H

10.2307/1907413

Samanta P., 2006, Assessing enterprise risk management practices of financial institutions

Santori L., 2005, Evaluating the enterprise risk management practices of insurance companies

Schwartz K. B., 1985, Auditor switches by failing firms, The Accounting Review, 60, 248

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 2003, Report on the role and function of credit rating agencies in the operation of the securities markets as required by Section 702(b) of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002

Sengupta P, 1998, Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt, The Accounting Review, 73, 459

Standard & Poor's (S&P), 2010, Expanded definition of adequate classification in enterprise risk management scores

10.1093/rfs/hhm061

Teoh S. H., 1993, Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient, The Accounting Review, 68, 346

10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5

10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00023-4