Enhancement of Quality in Chemical Inquiry by Pre-University Students
Tóm tắt
Our pre-university chemistry students face problems achieving sufficient quality in chemical inquiry. To try to enhance the quality of student performance in chemical inquiry, Dutch pre-university chemistry students (age 17) carried out an authentic research project on ‘Diffusion of ions in distilled water.’ The learning materials for this student inquiry project, the teaching scenario and the website were designed in cooperation with five chemistry teachers. Three teachers from this network and two other teachers also implemented the project with 80 students to find out whether the emphasis on relevant concepts of evidence (CoE) improves the quality of student inquiry outcomes. This part – with its emphasis on the CoE – in the student inquiry task is based on four key features: the students feel motivated to explore, focus their attention on, give meaning to and reflect upon CoE. In teams students conducted a guide experiment, analysed a scientific article, did an inquiry and wrote a report, discussed CoE with peers on the Internet and rewrote their reports. All lessons were observed, field notes were made and analysed on whether the intended student activities had been realised. The Internet discussion was recorded in a database and analysed. The first and final reports of all teams were coded and analysed. Also the students’ appreciation of the activities was assessed. The teaching and learning activities were realized to a very large extent as planned in the design. The emphasis on CoE resulted in 65% of the students achieving a sufficient level of quality in their final reports.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Boersma, K.Th. (1998). The Janus face of developmental research. Review of some designs of biology-didactical research. In O. De Jong, K. Kortland, A.J. Waarlo & J. Budding’ (Eds.), Bridging the gap between theory and practice: What research says to the science teacher (pp. 31–47). Hong Kong: ICASE.
Chinn, C.A. & Malhotra, B.A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218.
Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham: Open University.
Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (2003). Understanding and using scientific evidence – how to critically evaluate data (pp. 87–126). London: Sage Publications.
Hodson, D. (1992). Redefining and reorienting practical work in school science. School Science Review, 73, 65–78.
Kempa, R.F. & Dias, M.M. (1990). Students’ motivational traits and preferences for different instructional modes in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 195–216.
Lubben, F., Cambell, B., Buffler, A. & Allie, S. (2001). Point and set reasoning in practical science measurement by entering university freshmen. Science Education, 85, 311–327.
Lunetta, V.N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 249–262). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Millar, R., Lubben, F., Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1994). Investigating in the school science laboratory: Conceptual and procedural knowledge and their influence on performance. Research Papers in Education, 9, 207–249.
Nemetz, T. & Ball, D. (1995). A liquid-phase diffusion experiment. Journal of Chemical Education, 72, 244–246.
Oost, H. (1999). De kwaliteit van probleemstellingen in dissertaties (The quality of problem setting in dissertations). PhD thesis, Utrecht University.
Rollnick, M., Zwane, S., Staskun, M., Lotz, S. & Green, G. (2001). Improving pre-laboratory preparation of first year university chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1053–1071.
Rollnick, M., Lubben, F., Lotz, S. & Dlamini, B. (2002). What do underprepared students learn about measurement from introductory laboratory work? Research in Science Education, 32, 1–18.
Van Rens, E.M.M. (in preparation). Student inguiry in pre-university chemistry: Design of an effective learning and teaching process. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
Van Rens, E.M.M. & Dekkers, P.J.J.M. (2001). Learning about investigations – the teacher’s role. In H. Berendt, H. Dahnke, R. Duit, W. Graeber, M. Komorek, A. Kross & P. Reiska (Eds.), Research in science education – past, present and future (pp. 325–330). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Woolnough, B.E. (1997). Motivating students or teaching pure science? School Science Review, 78, 67–72.