Enclosed nests may provide greater thermal than nest predation benefits compared with open nests across latitudes

Functional Ecology - Tập 31 Số 6 - Trang 1231-1240 - 2017
Thomas E. Martin1, Andy J. Boyce2, Karolina Fierro‐Calderón2, Adam E. Mitchell2, Connor E. Armstad2, James C. Mouton2, Evertius E. Bin Soudi3
1U.S. Geological Survey Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit University of Montana Missoula MT 59812 USA
2Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit University of Montana Missoula MT 59812 USA
3Sabah Parks, P.O. Box 10626, 88806 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

Tóm tắt

Summary Nest structure is thought to provide benefits that have fitness consequences for several taxa. Traditionally, reduced nest predation has been considered the primary benefit underlying evolution of nest structure, whereas thermal benefits have been considered a secondary or even non‐existent factor. Yet, the relative roles of these factors on nest structures remain largely unexplored. Enclosed nests have a constructed or natural roof connected to sides that allow a restricted opening or tube entrance that provides cover in all directions except the entrance, whereas open nests are cups or platforms that are open above. We show that construction of enclosed nests is more common among songbirds (Passeriformes) in tropical and southern hemisphere regions than in north temperate regions. This geographic pattern may reflect selection from predation risk, under long‐standing assumptions that nest predation rates are higher in southern regions and that enclosed nests reduce predation risk compared with open cup nests. We therefore compared nest predation rates between enclosed vs. open nests in 114 songbird species that do not nest in tree holes among five communities of coexisting birds, and for 205 non‐hole‐nesting species from the literature, across northern temperate, tropical, and southern hemisphere regions. Among coexisting species, enclosed nests had lower nest predation rates than open nests in two south temperate sites, but not in either of two tropical sites or a north temperate site. Nest predation did not differ between nest types at any latitude based on literature data. Among 319 species from both our field studies and the literature, enclosed nests did not show consistent benefits of reduced predation and, in fact, predation was not consistently higher in the tropics, contrary to long‐standing perspectives. Thermal benefits of enclosed nests were indicated based on three indirect results. First, species that built enclosed nests were smaller than species using open nests both among coexisting species and among species from the literature. Smaller species lose heat fastest and thereby may gain important thermal benefits from reduced convective cooling. Second, eggs were warmed by parents for less time in species with enclosed nests, as can be expected if egg cooling rates are slower. Finally, species using enclosed nests exhibited enhanced growth of mass and wings compared with species using open nests, suggesting reduced thermoregulatory costs allowed increased energy for growth. Enclosed nests may therefore provide more consistent thermal than nest predation benefits, counter to long‐standing perspectives. A lay summary is available for this article.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1890/08-2224.1

10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[321:BBOPIA]2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01720.x

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x

10.1007/s00227-012-2070-y

10.1007/s00442-007-0897-6

10.2307/4087558

Calder W.A., 1984, Size, Function, and Life History

10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.09.010

10.2307/1369932

10.1515/9781400853625

10.2307/2424064

10.1007/s00442-005-0075-7

10.3184/175815516X14454107215458

10.1111/j.0908-8857.2007.03820.x

10.1086/284325

10.2307/1936863

10.1098/rsbl.2004.0247

10.1007/BF00299826

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1957.tb02902.x

10.1126/science.1157704

10.1642/AUK-15-23.1

10.1111/1365-2656.12017

10.1098/rspb.2010.2798

10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07785.x

10.1038/nature11631

10.1111/j.1474-919X.1948.tb01399.x

10.1016/j.tca.2003.08.029

10.1111/ibi.12325

10.1007/s10336‐016‐1417‐4

Maddison W. P.&Maddison D. R.(2011)Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 2.75.http://mesquiteproject.wikispaces.com/.

10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0989:LHCONS]2.0.CO;2

10.1007/BF00317595

10.2307/5919

10.3161/000164508X345310

10.1002/ece3.1054

10.1071/MU9910236

10.1016/0531-5565(92)90081-A

10.2307/2937160

10.2307/3677257

10.1098/rspb.2001.1879

10.1086/674966

10.1126/science.aad1173

Martin T.E., 2015, Data from: Age‐related mortality explains life history strategies of tropical and temperate songbirds, Dryad Digital Repository

10.1098/rstb.2007.0009

10.1126/science.287.5457.1482

10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00204.x

10.1086/681986

Martin T.E., 2015, Data from: Adult mortality probability and nest predation rates explain parental effort in warming eggs with consequences for embryonic development time, Dryad Digital Repository

Martin T.E., 2015, Data from: Postnatal growth rates covary weakly with embryonic development rates and do not explain adult mortality probability among songbirds on four continents, Dryad Digital Repository

10.1023/A:1021126920753

10.2307/4081922

10.1111/j.1474-919X.1964.tb03695.x

10.1002/ece3.1345

10.2307/2388174

10.2307/40168303

10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80637-X

10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412

10.1007/s003600050258

10.1111/j.1600-048X.2012.05599.x

10.2307/1936795

10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[0526:AUATAN]2.0.CO;2

10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2559:TIONIE]2.0.CO;2

10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1713:TIONTA]2.0.CO;2

10.2307/3627345

10.1111/j.1474-919X.1949.tb02293.x

10.1111/j.1474-919X.1966.tb07248.x

10.2307/40168306

10.1007/BF01644591

10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12436.x

10.1071/MU9831

10.2307/2389344

10.1007/s002650100324

Wells K., 2006, Nest sites of rodents and treeshrews in Borneo, Ecotropica, 12, 141

10.1126/science.186.4159.107

10.2307/1942309