Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure

Personality and Social Psychology Review - Tập 11 Số 2 - Trang 150-166 - 2007
Michael C. Ashton1, Kibeom Lee2
1Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
2University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

Tóm tắt

The authors argue that a new six-dimensional framework for personality structure—the HEXACO model— constitutes a viable alternative to the well-known Big Five or five-factor model. The new model is consistent with the cross-culturally replicated finding of a common six-dimensional structure containing the factors Honesty-Humility (H), Emotionality (E), eExtraversion (X), Agreeableness (A), Conscientiousness (C), and Openness to Experience (O). Also, the HEXACO model predicts several personality phenomena that are not explained within the B5/FFM, including the relations of personality factors with theoretical biologists' constructs of reciprocal and kin altruism and the patterns of sex differences in personality traits. In addition, the HEXACO model accommodates several personality variables that are poorly assimilated within the B5/FFM.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Angleitner, A., Paper presented at the First European Congress of Psychology

10.1002/per.417

10.1002/per.433

10.1002/per.541

10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00351.x

Ashton, M.C., 2005, Six factors in the Croatian personality lexicon

Ashton, M.C., Journal of Research in Personality

Ashton, M.C., Paper presented at the 13th European Conference on Personality

10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.707

10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.245

10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356

10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00009-9

10.1126/science.7466396

10.1002/per.411

Buss, D.M. (1996). Social adaptation and five major factors of personality . In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality (pp. 180-207). New York: Guilford.

10.1017/S0140525X99001818

10.1002/per.2410080502

10.1007/BF02289253

Chance, M.R.A., 1970, Social groups of monkeys, apes, and men

10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00511-3

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00325.x

10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.258

Costa, P.T., 1992, NEO Personality Inventory—Revised (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual

10.1002/per.2410060103

10.1002/per.2410060405

De Raad, B., 1994, European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 17

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199803/04)12:2<75::AID-PER288>3.0.CO;2-H

10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.451

10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.95

10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246

10.1207/s15327906mbr1602_2

10.1038/415137a

Frank, R.H., 1988, Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions

Gilbert, P., 1989, Human nature and suffering

Gilbert, P., 1992, Depression: The evolution of powerlessness

Goldberg, L.R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216

10.1002/1099-0984(200011/12)14:6<497::AID-PER379>3.0.CO;2-R

10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00067-8

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<261::AID-PER340>3.0.CO;2-B

Hamilton, W.D., 1964, Biology, 7, 1

Hogan, R. (1996). A socioanalytic perspective on the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality (pp. 163-179). New York: Guilford.

Hrebickova, M., 1995, The structural model of personality based on the lexical analysis: A Czech replication study of the five-factor model based on a comprehensive taxonomy of personality-descriptive adjectives. Unpublished manuscript

10.1006/obhd.1996.2673

10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00101-0

10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8

10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016

10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.182

Lee, K., 2006, Re-analysis of the structure of the Greek personality lexicon

10.1207/s15327043hup1802_4

Lee, K., Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

10.1023/A:1023961603479

10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00354.x

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00505.x

10.1177/0022022198291007

McCrae, R.R. (1989). Why I advocate the five-factor model: Joint analyses of the NEO-PI with other instruments. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 237-245). New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag .

10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509

10.4324/9780203428412

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00276.x

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x

10.1002/per.539

10.1037/h0040291

10.1038/364056a0

Ostendorf, F., Paper presented at the 6th meeting of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences

Ostendorf, F., Paper presented at the 12th European Conference on Personality

10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

10.1002/per.496

10.1002/per.474

10.1111/1467-6494.00080

10.1007/BF00288453

10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.856

10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199603)10:1<61::AID-PER246>3.0.CO;2-D

Szarota, P., 1995, Taxonomy and structure of Polish personality-relevant adjectives

10.1002/per.2410080203

10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411

10.1037/h0036681

10.1086/406755

10.21236/AD0267778

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00973.x

Wasti, A., 2006, The Turkish personality lexicon and the HEXACO model of personality

Wiggins, J.S., 1979, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781

Wilson, E.O., 1975, Sociobiology: The new synthesis

Yoo, T.-Y., 2004, Psychology, 18, 61