Emotions in the Theory of Cultural-Historical Subjectivity of González Rey
Tóm tắt
In the theoretical thinking of González Rey, the acknowledge of the generating character of emotions and their infinite unfolding associated with symbolic productions, which are not of the order of meaning, has represented an essential step for a theory of cultural-historical subjectivity capable of transcending the limitations associated with the treatment of this subject in the modern period. Emotions must be understood in their generating capacity, not as effects, but as processes that maintain a recursive relationship with other psychic processes, as opposed to understanding the psychic coming from other elements, which are at the base, until today, of all atomistic psychology of empirical orientation. In this work, we review different investigations carried out in the field of emotions by Fernando González-Rey, which will allow us to understand better the role of emotions in the production of subjective senses that always anticipate the actions of the subject, actions that can have very different forms of expression. Therefore, those subjective senses associated with the subject can be corroded, distorted, or even modified in the process of production of new subjective senses that is developing in the course of the subject’s action.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adolphs R., Tranel D., Damasio H. y Damasio, A. (1994). Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdale. Nature, 372, 669–672.
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals [electronic version]. London: John Murray.
Fakhrutdinova, L. R. (2010). On the phenomenon of “Perezhivanie”. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(2), 31–47.
Goleman, D. (2013). La inteligencia emocional. Madrid: Editorial Vergara.
González Rey, F. (1995). Acerca de lo social y lo subjetivo en el socialismo [about the social and the subjective in socialism]. TEMAS, 3, 93–101.
González Rey, F. (1999). La Afectividad desde una perspectiva de la subjetividad. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 15(2), 127–134.
González Rey, F (2000). El lugar de las emociones en la constitución social de lo psíquico. Educação & Sociedade, XXI (70), 132–148.
González Rey, F. (2002). Sujeto y subjetividad: una aproximación histórico-cultural. México D. F., México: Thomson.
González Rey, F. (2009). Historical relevance of Vygotsky’s work: its significance for a new approach to the problem of subjectivity in psychology. Critical Practice Studies, 1, 59–73.
González Rey, F. (2011). A Re-examination of Defining Moments in Vygotsky’s Work and Their Implications for His Continuing Legacy. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18, 257–275.
Fossa, P., Madrigal Pérez, R., & Muñoz Marcotti, C. (2019). The relationship between the inner speech and emotions: revisiting the study of passions in psychology. Human Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-019-00079-5.
Harlow, J. M. (1848/1999). Passage of an iron rod through the head. Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences, 11, 281–283.
Harlow, J.M. (1868(. Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head. Publ Mass Med Soc. 2:327–347.
James, W. (1909). Psychologie. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.
Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.
Leontiev, A. A. (1992). Ecce Homo. Methodological problems. Multidisciplinary.newsletter for Activity Theory, 11(12), 41–44.
Leontiev, A. (2001). Deyatelnii Um (Deyatelnosti, snack, lichnosti). Moscú: Smysl.
Madrigal Pérez, R. (2018). La contribución de Fernando González Rey al desarrollo de la subjetividad cultural-histórica. La evolución de un pensamiento en movimiento. Libro en construcción.
Madrigal Pérez, R. (2019). La producción de sentidos subjetivos y configuraciones subjetivas del profesor cubano dentro del sistema totalitario cubano. Teoría y Critica de la Psicología. México: Universidad de Michoacán.
Malinowski-Charles, S. (2009). Emotions as the engines of Spinoza’s ethics. Kritika & Kontext, No. 38/39, 120–125.
Martí Pérez, J. (2001). Los códigos nuevos. Centro de Estudios Martianos: Obras completas. Edición crítica. La Habana.
Mills, C. K. (1912). The cortical representation of emotion, with a discussion of some points in the general nervous system mechanism of expression in its relation to organic nervous disease and insanity [Electronic Version]. Proceedings of the American Medico-Psychological Association, 19, 297–300.
Murray, H. (1964).Test de Apercepción Temática (T.A.T). Buenos Aires: Editorial Paidós.
Punset, E. (2013). Aprender a gestionar las emociones. Redes 130. Documental, producción de TVE con la colaboración del grupo Punset producciones S.A.
Rubistein, S.L. (1945). Philosophical Foundations of Soviet Psychology. Dordrecht, New York: D.Reidel, Humanities Press.
Rubistein, J. L. (1968). Principios de la Psicología General. Grijalbo: Edición Revolucionaria. Instituto cubano del libro. Barcelona.
Sackeim, H.A. y Gur, R.E. (1978). Emotions are expressed more intensely on the left side of face. Science, 202, 434–436.
Spinoza, B. (1667/1980). Ética demostrada según orden geométrico. Madrid: Ediciones Orbis.
Tolle, E. (2012). Una nueva tierra. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial: Granada.
Vattimo, G. (2000). Diálogogo con Nietzsche. Madrid: Cristiandad.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and Speech. En R. Rieber y A. S. Carton (Eds). The collected works of L.S.Vygotsky. Vol. 1 (pp. 43–287) New York: Plenum Press.
Wundt, W. M. (1911). Psicología de los pueblos. Paris: Felix Alcan Editor.
Yanitsky, A. (2012). Revisionist resolution in Vygotskian Science: towards cultural – historical Gestalt psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 50(4), 3–15.
Zanjonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.