Đạo đức nhúng: một đề xuất để tích hợp đạo đức vào phát triển trí tuệ nhân tạo y tế

BMC Medical Ethics - Tập 23 - Trang 1-10 - 2022
Stuart McLennan1, Amelia Fiske1, Daniel Tigard1, Ruth Müller2, Sami Haddadin3, Alena Buyx1,3
1Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
2Munich Center for Technology in Society, School of Management and School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
3Munich School of Robotics and Machine Intelligence, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Tóm tắt

Sự xuất hiện của những vấn đề đạo đức xoay quanh trí tuệ nhân tạo (AI) đã dẫn đến việc công bố một loạt các nguyên tắc đạo đức cấp cao từ nhiều tổ chức công và tư khác nhau. Tuy nhiên, cần xem xét cách mà các nhà phát triển AI có thể được hỗ trợ thực tiễn để tiên đoán, nhận diện và giải quyết các vấn đề đạo đức liên quan đến công nghệ AI. Điều này đặc biệt quan trọng trong phát triển AI dành cho môi trường chăm sóc sức khoẻ, nơi mà các ứng dụng thường xuyên tương tác trực tiếp với bệnh nhân trong nhiều trạng thái dễ tổn thương khác nhau. Trong bài báo này, chúng tôi đề xuất rằng phương pháp ‘đạo đức nhúng’, trong đó các nhà đạo đức và nhà phát triển cùng nhau giải quyết các vấn đề đạo đức thông qua một quy trình lặp đi lặp lại và liên tục từ giai đoạn đầu phát triển, có thể là một cách hiệu quả để tích hợp những cân nhắc đạo đức vững chắc vào sự phát triển thực tiễn của trí tuệ nhân tạo y tế.

Từ khóa

#trí tuệ nhân tạo #đạo đức #y tế #phát triển công nghệ #vấn đề đạo đức

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cragila M, et al. Artificial Intelligence—a European perspective. Luxembourg: European Commission Publications Office; 2018. Crawford K, et al. AI now 2019 report. New York: AI Now Institute; 2019. Coeckelbergh M. Ethics of artificial intelligence: some ethical issues and regulatory challenges. Technol Regul. 2019;2019:31–4. Bostrom N, Yudkowsky E. The ethics of artificial intelligence. In: Frankish K, Ramsey WM, editors. The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 316–34. Whittlestone J, Nyrup R, Alexandrova A, Dihal K, Cave S. Ethical and societal implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: a roadmap for research, vol. 59. Nuffield Foundation, 2019. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:389–99. Floridi L, et al. AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds Mach. 2018;28:689–707. Hagendorff DT. The ethics of AI ethics: an evaluation of guidelines. Minds Mach. 2020;30:99–12. Mittelstadt B. Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:501–7. Ochigame, R. The invention of “Ethical AI”: how big tech manipulates academia to avoid regulation. The Intercept. 2019. URL: https://theintercept.com/2019/12/20/mit-ethical-ai-artificial-intelligence/. Dignam A. Artificial intelligence, tech corporate governance and the public interest regulatory response. Camb J Regions Economy Soc. 2020;13(1):37–54. Metcalf J, Moss E, Boyd D. Owning ethics: Corporate logics, Silicon Valley, and the institutionalization of ethics. Soc Res Int Q. 2019;82:449–76. Floridi L, Strait A. Ethical foresight analysis: What it is and why it is needed? Minds Mach. 2020;30:77–97. Grosz B, et al. Embedded ethiCS: integrating ethics broadly across computer science education. Commun ACM. 2018;62:54–61. Fiesler C. Tech ethics curricula: a collection of syllabi. Medium. 2018. URL: https://medium.com/@cfiesler/tech-ethics-curriculaa-collection-of-syllabi-3eedfb76be18. OECD Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. 2019. URL: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449. Topol E. Deep medicine: how artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. Basic Books; 2019. Celi LA, Fine B, Stone DJ. An awakening in medicine: the partnership of humanity and intelligent machines. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1(6):e255–7. Liu X, et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Dig Health. 2019;1:e271–97. Shortliffe EH, Sepúlveda MJ. Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence. JAMA. 2018;320:2199–200. Schork NJ. Artificial intelligence and personalized medicine. Cancer Treat Res. 2019;178:265–83. Woo M. An AI boost for clinical trials. Nature. 2019;573:S100–2. Fleming N. How artificial intelligence is changing drug discovery. Nature. 2018;557:S55–7. Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2019;6:94–8. Shibata T, Wada K. Robot therapy: a new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly—a mini-review. Gerontology. 2011;57:378–86. Fiske A, Henningsen P, Buyx A. Your robot therapist will see you now: ethical implications of embodied artificial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e13216. Johannes MS, et al. An overview of the developmental process for the modular prosthetic limb. J Hopkins APL Tech Dig. 2011;30:207–16. Jahn E, Reindl A, Müller M, Haddadin S. Roboterassistenten als Helfer der Senioren im Alltag der Zukunft? Altenheim (accepted 2019). Cresswell K, Cunningham-Burley S, Sheikh A. Health care robotics: qualitative exploration of key challenges and future directions. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e10410. Davenport TH, Glover WJ. Artificial intelligence and the augmentation of health care decision-making. NEJM Catal. 2018;2018:16. Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;29:1216–9. Rigby MJ. Ethical dimensions of using artificial intelligence in health care. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21:E121-124. Ienca M, Wangmo T, Jotterand F, Kressig RW, Elger B. Ethical design of intelligent assistive technologies for dementia: a descriptive review. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:1035–55. Diehl JJ, Schmitt LM, Villano M, Crowell CR. The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012;6:249–62. Szabo L. Artificial Intelligence Is Rushing Into Patient Care—and Could Raise Risks. Scientific American. 2019. URL: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/artificial-intelligence-is-rushing-into-patient-care-and-could-raise-risks/. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366:447–53. McLennan S, Fiske A, Celi LA, Müller R, Harder J, Ritt K, Haddadin S, Buyx A. An embedded ethics approach for AI development. Nat Mach Intell. 2020;2:488–90. Bezuidenhout L, Ratti E. What does it mean to embed ethics in data science? An integrative approach based on microethics and virtues. AI Soc. 2020;2020:1–15. Bonnemains V, Saurel C, Tessier C. Embedded ethics: some technical and ethical challenges. Ethics Inf Technol. 2018;20:41–58. Ives J, et al. Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19:68. Jonsen A, Siegler M, Winslade W. Clinical ethics, 8th edition: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. McGraw Hill, 2015. Hilgartner S, Prainsack B, Hurlbut B. Ethics as governance in genomics and beyond. In Felt U, Fouché R, Miller CA, Smith-Doerr L, editors. The handbook of science and technology studies, MIT Press, 2017. p. 823–852. Hellström T. Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technol Soc. 2003;25(3):369–84. Guston DH. Responsible knowledge based innovation. Society. 2006;43(4):19–21. Owen R, Bessant JR, Heintz M (eds.). Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley. 2013. Van den Hoven J, Doorn N, Swierstra T, Koops BJ, Romijn H. Responsible innovation. In: Third international conference on responsible innovation, vol. 22. Springer, 2014. Dignum V. Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use AI in a responsible way. Springer Nature, 2019. Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy. 2013;42(9):1568–80. Von Schomberg R. A vision of responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Bessant JR, Heintz M, editors. Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley; 2013. p. 51–74. Bietti E. From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 2020; p. 210–219. Floridi L. Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: five risks of being unethical. Philos Technol. 2019;32(2):185–93. Begley S. In a lab pushing the boundaries of biology, an embedded ethicist keeps scientists in check. Statnews, 2017. URL: https://www.statnews.com/2017/02/23/bioethics-harvard-george-church/. Matthias A. The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf Technol. 2004;6(3):175–83. Arrieta AB, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inform Fusion. 2020;58:82–115. McDougall RJ. Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI. J Med Ethics. 2019;45(3):156–60. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019. Richardson HS. Specifying, balancing, and interpreting bioethical principles. J Med Philos. 2000;25(3):285–307. https://doi.org/10.1076/0360-5310(200006)25:3;1-H;FT285. Ferretti A, Ienca M, Hurst S, Vayena E. Big data, biomedical research, and ethics review: new challenges for IRBs. Ethics Hum Res. 2020;42(5):17–28. Adadi A, Berrada M. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access. 2018;6:52138–60. Wachter S, Mittelstadt B, Russell C. Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: automated decisions and the GDPR. Harv JL Tech. 2018;31:841. Wachter S, Mittelstadt B. A right to reasonable inferences: re-thinking data protection law in the age of big data and AI. Columbia Bus Law Rev. 2019;2:494–620. European Commission, Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. 2021. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELLAR:e0649735-a372-11eb-9585-01aa75ed71a1. Sample I. Maths and tech specialists need Hippocratic oath, says academic. The Guaradian. 2019. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/aug/16/mathematicians-need-doctor-style-hippocratic-oath-says-academic-hannah-fry. Wagner B. Ethics as an escape from regulation: from ethics-washing to ethics-shopping? In: Bayamlioglu E, Baraliuc I, Janssens LAW, Hildebrandt M, editors. 10 Years of profiling the European Citizen. Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). 2018. p. 108–15.