Embedded Formative Assessment and Classroom Process Quality
Tóm tắt
In this study we examine the interplay between curriculum-embedded formative assessment—a well-known teaching practice—and general features of classroom process quality (i.e., cognitive activation, supportive climate, classroom management) and their combined effect on elementary school students’ understanding of the scientific concepts of floating and sinking. We used data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial and compared curriculum-embedded formative assessment (17 classes) with a control group (11 classes). Curriculum-embedded formative assessment and classroom process quality promoted students’ learning. Moreover, classroom process quality and embedded formative assessment interacted in promoting student learning. To ensure effective instruction and consequently satisfactory learning outcomes, teachers need to combine specific teaching practices with high classroom process quality.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alonzo A., 2012, Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions, 10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7
Anderson L. W., 1989, The IEA Classroom Environment Study
Ball D. L., 2011, American Educator, 35, 17
Benton S. L., 2012, Student ratings of teaching: A summary of research and literature
Bolger N., 2012, Handbook of research methods for studying daily life, 285
Bransford J. D., 2000, How people learn
Brophy J., 2000, Teaching
Danielson C., 1996, Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching
Doyle W., 1986, Handbook of research on teaching, 3, 392
Elben C. E., 2001, Marburger Sprachverständnistest für Kinder ab 5 Jahren
Glück C. W., 2011, Wortschatz- und Wortfindungstest für 6– bis 10–Jährige: WWT 6–10
Good T. L., 2009, International handbook of research on teachers and teaching, 803, 10.1007/978-0-387-73317-3_51
Gwet K. L., 2012, Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among multiple raters
Hamre B. K., 2007, Building a science of classrooms: Application of the CLASS framework in over 4,000 U.S. early childhood and elementary classrooms
Hattie J., 2009, Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement
Hertel S., 2009, Beratungskompetenz von Lehrern—Kompetenzdiagnostik, Kompetenzförderung, Kompetenzmodellierung
Hondrich A. L., Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
Kane T. J., 2013, Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment
Klieme E., 2008, Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie, 319
Klieme E., 2009, The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom, 137
Kounin J. S., 1970, Discipline and group management in classrooms
Martin M. O., 2008, TIMSS 2007 international science report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades
Martin M. O., 2012, TIMSS 2011 international results in science
Möller K., 2005, Die KiNT-Boxen-Kinder lernen Naturwissenschaft und Technik. Paket 1: Schwimmen und Sinken
Muthén L. K., 1998, Mplus
O’Donnell C. L., 2007, Fidelity of implementation to instructional strategies as a moderator of curriculum unit effectiveness in a large-scale middle school science quasi-experiment
Petermann F., 2010, SET 5–10. Sprachstandserhebungstest für Kinder im Alter zwischen 5 und 10 Jahren
Pianta R. C., 2008, Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS)
Pollmeier J., Competence assessment in education: Research, models and instruments
Raudenbush S. W., 2002, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
Scheerens J., 1997, The foundations of educational effectiveness
Schmidt W. H., 2009, Handbook on education policy research, 541
Schütte K., 2007, PISA 2006–Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie, 125
Weiß R. H., 2006, CFT 20–R. Grundintelligenztest Skala 2—Revision