Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model

SAGE Publications - Tập 61 Số 8 - Trang 1087-1115 - 2008
Cecily D. Cooper1
1University of Miami

Tóm tắt

A number of studies have demonstrated that humor can impact both horizontal and vertical relationships in organizations, but little is known about the interpersonal processes underlying this link. By integrating theory and research from the fields of philosophy, social psychology, communications, and leadership, it is possible to illuminate a combination of processes which, considered collectively, explain humor's ability to create, maintain, impede, or destroy relationships at work. I first review the classical theories of humor, which explain what motivates individuals to express humor and what determines humor enjoyment. However, since these frameworks focus on humor at the individual-level of analysis, they cannot speak to the social processes involved in a humor exchange. Research in the fields of social psychology, communications, and leadership provides insight regarding the remaining social mechanisms. In sum, it appears that interpersonal humor operates through four related but distinct processes: affect-reinforcement, similarity-attraction, self-disclosure, and hierarchical salience. These social processes are proposed to function in addition to (not in lieu of) the individual-level mechanisms the classical humor theories describe. The discussion, thus, culminates in a relational process model of humor, contributing a more fine-grained understanding of interpersonal humor to the organizational literature.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ackroyd, S., 1999, Organizational misbehavior

Altman, I., 1973, Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships

10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00155-8

10.2307/257094

10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.272

10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00502.x

Bowling, A., 2000, Rural Telecommunications, 19, 40

10.1177/001872675701000207

Byrne, D., 1971, The attraction paradigm

Byrne, D. & Neuman, J.H. The implications of attraction research for organizational issues. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1992 , pp. 29-70.

10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01920.x

10.1016/0749-5978(86)90041-5

Caudron, S., 1992, Personnel Journal, 71, 63

10.1016/B978-0-12-362950-0.50013-6

Clouse, R.W., 1995, Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 32, 1

10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457

10.1177/017084068800900203

10.1111/1467-6486.00292

Cooper, C.D., Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management

10.5465/AMR.2005.18378877

10.1177/001872675901200205

Coser, R.L., 1960, Psychiatry, 23, 81, 10.1080/00332747.1960.11023205

Decker, W.H., 2001, Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 450

10.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00570.x

Derlega, V.J., 1993, Self-disclosure

10.5465/amr.1982.4285511

10.1177/104649648501600412

10.1177/014920639001600203

10.1177/001872679104400101

10.1177/0018726706068783

Farrell, L., 1998, ARMA Records Management Quarterly, 32, 3

Frecknall, P., 1994, Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 31, 12

Freud, S. Humour. In Collected papers. London: Hogarth Press, 1950, pp. 215-21.

Freud, S., 1960, Jokes and their relation to the unconscious

10.2307/1556333

10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827

10.2307/2785669

Goodchilds, J.D. On being witty: Causes, correlates, and consequences. In J. Goldstein & P. McGhee (Eds), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues. New York: Academic Press, 1972, pp. 173-93.

Graf, L., 1995, HRMagazine, 40, 64

10.1016/0030-5073(79)90008-4

10.1016/B978-0-12-362950-0.50018-5

10.1016/0191-8869(85)90081-9

10.1080/00223980.1986.9712625

Hof, R.D., 1996, Business Week, 66

10.1177/1461445600002002002

10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122

Jourard, S., 1971, Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self

10.1177/0021886389251004

Keith-Spiegel, P. Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues. In J. Goldstein & P. McGhee (Eds), The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues. New York: Academic Press , 1972, pp. 4-39.

10.1177/001872679004300804

10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.015

Leap, T.L., 1984, Harvard Business Review, 62, 74

Levine, J. Approaches to humor appreciation. In J. Levine (Ed.), Motivation in humor. New York : Atherton Press, 1969, pp. 1-27.

10.1287/orsc.7.1.40

10.17730/humo.28.1.273176718w578211

10.2307/257110

Markels, A., 1997, Wall Street Journal, B2

Martin, J., 1992, Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives, 10.1093/oso/9780195071634.001.0001

10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.145

10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50011-0

Mindess, H., 1971, Laughter and liberation

Morreall, J., 1987, The philosophy of laughter and humor

10.5465/amr.1998.533225

10.1016/1053-4822(93)90004-N

O'Reilly, C., 1995, Southwest Airlines: Using human resources for a competitive advantage (A). (Case No. HR-1A)

10.2307/2657354

Radcliffe-Brown, A.R., 1952, Structure and function in primitive society: Essays and addresses

10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00710.x

10.17730/humo.18.4.07j88hr1p4074605

10.1177/001872678003301105

10.1177/0018726702055001606

10.1002/1097-4679(199301)49:1<13::AID-JCLP2270490103>3.0.CO;2-S

10.1080/03637750600889500

10.1177/104649648902000202

10.1080/01463379609369999

10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.701

Wyer, R.S., 2004, Social comprehension and judgment: The role of situation models, narratives, and implicit theories

10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.663