Eliciting beekeepers’ preferences for the small hive beetle control policy in Italy: a contingent valuation survey approach

Agricultural and Food Economics - 2023
Cristina Salvioni1, Simone Cerroni2
1Department of Economics, University of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy
2Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

Tóm tắt

Aethina tumida, commonly known as the small hive beetle (SHB), is a parasite of social bee colonies. In 2014, when the beetle was first detected in the Italian Region of Calabria, the Italian Ministry of Health started an SHB control strategy. Over time, dissatisfaction with the control measures has grown among beekeepers and eroded compliance with the reporting obligations. Our study analyzes Southern Italian beekeepers’ preferences toward alternative SHB control policy. We use a contingent valuation survey to elicit beekeepers' preferences for five alternative control strategies. We find the ex-post biosecurity measure in place reflects in the lowest reporting rate. Our results suggest that implementing the destruction of infested hives only (selective destruction) can be a first, effective step toward enhancing compliance with the reporting obligations. Our findings also suggest that training and extension can be a winning strategy to improve beekeepers’ collaboration with the passive SHB surveillance system.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutström EE (2006) Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Exp Econ 9(4):383–405

Barnes AP, Moxey AP, Ahmadi BV, Borthwick FA (2015) The effect of animal health compensation on ‘positive’behaviours towards exotic disease reporting and implementing biosecurity: a review, a synthesis and a research agenda. Prev Vet Med 122(1–2):42–52

Cameron AR (2019) Strategies for the global eradication of peste des petits ruminants: an argument for the use of guerrilla rather than trench warfare. Front Vet Sci 6:331

Cerroni S (2020) Eliciting farmers’ subjective probabilities, risk, and uncertainty preferences using contextualized field experiments. Agric Econ 51(5):707–724

Cook CN et al (2017) Considering cost alongside the effectiveness of management in evidence-based conservation: a systematic reporting protocol. Biol Cons 209:508–516

Delaplane KS (1998) Small hive beetle, Aethina tumida, in the southeast. Am Bee J 138:884–885

European Union (2014) Commission Implementing Decision of December 12 2014 Concerning Certain Protective Measures with Regard to Confirmed Occurrences of the Small Hive Beetle in Italy. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium

Fraser R (2018) Compensation payments and animal disease: incentivising farmers both to undertake costly on-farm biosecurity and to comply with disease reporting requirements. Environ Resour Econ 70(3):617–629

Gates MC, Earl L, Enticott G (2021) Factors influencing the performance of voluntary farmer disease reporting in passive surveillance systems: a scoping review. Prev Vet Med 196:105487

Gramig BM, Horan RD, Wolf CA (2009) Livestock disease indemnity design when moral hazard is followed by adverse selection. Am J Agr Econ 91(3):627–641

Hennessy DA, Marsh TL (2021) Economics of animal health and livestock disease. Handbook Agric Econ 5:4233–4330

Meyerhoff J, Liebe U (2010) Determinants of protest responses in environmental valuation: a meta-study. Ecol Econ 70(2):366–374

Ministry of Health (2014) Nota del Ministero della Salute n. 18842 del 12 Settembre 2014; Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy

Neumann P, Elzen PJ (2004) The biology of the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida, Coleoptera: Nitidulidae): Gaps in our knowledge of an invasive species. Apidologie 35:229–247

Osseni AF, Gohin A, Rault A (2022) Optimal biosecurity policy with heterogeneous farmers. J Agric Resour Econ 47(2):355–372

Putnam RD, Leonardi R, Nanetti RY (1992) Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Revelt D, Train K (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):647–657

Sabella G, Mulè R, Robba L, Agrò A, Manachini B (2022) Could Europe apply a suitable control method for the small hive beetle (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae)?. J Econ Entomol 115(2):401–411.

Salvioni C, Champetier A (2022) A survey of experts’ opinions on the management of the small hive beetle in Italy. Sustainability 14(12):7004

Tarver MR, Huang Q, de Guzman L, Rinderer T, Holloway B, Reese J, Weaver D, Evans JD (2016) Transcriptomic and functional resources for the small hive beetle Aethina tumida, a worldwide parasite of honey bees. Genom Data 9:97–99

Train K (2009) Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Villanueva AJ, Glenk K, Rodríguez-Entrena M (2017) Protest Responses and willingness to accept: ecosystem services providers’ preferences towards incentive-based schemes. J Agric Econ 68(3):801–821

Wang T, Hennessy DA (2014) Modelling interdependent participation incentives: dynamics of a voluntary livestock disease control programme. Eur Rev Agric Econ 41(4):681–706

Weigel C et al (2021) Challenges in recruiting US farmers for policy-relevant economic field experiments. Appl Econ Perspect Policy 43(2):556–572

Zawislak J (2010) Managing Small Hive Beetles; Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas, US Department of Agriculture, and County Governments Cooperating: Fayetteville. AR, USA

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Agricultural and Food Economics

Thông tin tác giả