Điện tái chế Kaolinite chứa chì bằng cách sử dụng màng chọn lọc cation và các dung dịch điện phân khác nhau

Acar, Y. B., & Alshawabkeh, A. N. (1993). Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 2638–2647. Almeira, O. J., Peng, C. S., & Abou-Shady, A. (2012). Simultaneous removal of cadmium from kaolin and catholyte during soil electrokinetic remediation. Desalination, 300, 1–11. Altin, A., & Degirmenci, M. (2005). Lead (II) removal from natural soils by enhanced electrokinetic remediation. Science of the Total Environment, 337, 1–10. Amrate, S., Akretche, D. E., Innocent, C., & Seta, P. (2005). Removal of Pb from a calcareous soil during EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction. Science of the Total Environment, 349, 56–66. Baek, K., Kim, D. H., Park, S. W., Ryu, B. G., Bajargal, T., & Yang, J. S. (2009). Electrolyte conditioning-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of arsenic-contaminated mine tailing. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161, 457–462. Bongay, D. J. R., & Ngo, R. L. (2012). Electroremediation of Cu-contaminated soil. International Journal of Chemical and Biological Engineering, 6, 96–101. Chen, X., Shen, Z., Lei, Y., Ju, B., & Wang, W. (2006). Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of Cd and Pb spiked soil coupled with cation exchange membrane. Soil Research, 44, 523–529. Coletta, T. F., Bruell, C. J., Ryan, D. K., & Inyang, H. I. (1997). Cation-enhanced removal of lead from kaolinite by electro-kinetics. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 123, 1227–1233. Dzenitis, J. M. (1997). Soil chemistry effects and flow predication in electro-remediation of soil. Environmental Science and Technology, 31, 1191–1197. Fernandez, A., Hlavackova, P., Pomès, V., & Sardin, M. (2009). Physico-chemical limitations during the electrokinetic treatment of a polluted soil. Chemical Engineering Journal, 145, 355–361. Giannis, A., Pentari, D., Wang, J. Y., & Gidarakos, E. (2010). Application of sequential extraction analysis to electrokinetic remediation of cadmium, nickel and zinc from contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 184, 547–554. Gidarakos, E., & Giannis, A. (2006). Chelate agents enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removal cadmium and zinc by conditioning catholyte pH. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 172, 295–312. Gu, Y. Y., & Yeung, A. T. (2011). Desorption of cadmium from a natural Shanghai clay using citric acid industrial wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 191, 144–149. Hamed, J., Acar, Y. B., & Gale, R. J. (1991). Pb (II) removal from kaolinite by electro-kinetics. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117, 241–270. Kaya, A., & Yukselen, Y. (2005). Zeta potential of soils with surfactants and its relevance to electrokinetic remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 120, 119–126. Lee, H. H., & Yang, J. W. (2000). A new method to control electrolytes pH by circulation system in electrokinetic soil remediation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 77, 227–240. Li, Z., Yu, J., & Neretnieks, I. (1998). Electroremediation: removal of heavy metals by using cation selective membrane. Environmental Science and Technology, 32, 394–397. Moayedi, H., Huat, B. B. K., Kazemian, S., & Mohammad, T. A. (2012). Effect of stabilizer reagents on zeta potential of kaolinite and its relevance to electrokinetic treatment. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 33, 103–110. Naidu, R., Smith, E., Megharaj, M., Smith, L.H., Sreedaran, B.R., Churchman, G.J., Kookana, R.S., Juhasz, A., Gates, W., Oliver, D.P., Ragusa, S., Taylor, G., & Peter, P. (1999). Options for remediating metal contaminated soils: an overview. In: Johnston, C.D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Contaminated Site Remediation: Challenges Posed by Urban and Industrial Contaminants. Perth, Australia, 1999, pp. 483–496. Page, M. M., & Page, C. L. (2002). Electroremediation of contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 128, 208–219. Probstein, R. F., & Hicks, R. E. (1993). Removal of contaminants from soils by electric fields. Science, 260, 498–503. Reddy, K., & Chinthamreddy, S. (2003). Sequentially enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in low buffering clayey soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129, 263–277. Reddy, K. R., Parupudi, U. S., Devulapalli, S. N., & Xu, C. Y. (1997). Effects of soil composition on the removal of chromium by electrokinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 55, 135–158. Reed, B. E., & Berg, M. T. (1994). In-situ electrokinetic remediation of lead contaminated soil: II. Effect of reservoir conditioning. Hazardous and Industrial Wastes, 26, 514–521. Reed, B. E., Berg, M. T., Thompson, J. C., & Hatfield, J. H. (1995). Chemical conditioning of electrode reservoirs during electrokinetic soil flushing of Pb-contaminated silt loam. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 121, 805–815. Ryu, B. G., Park, G. Y., Yang, J. W., & Baek, K. (2011). Electrolyte conditioning for electrokinetic remediation of As, Cu, and Pb-contaminated soil. Separation and Purification Technology, 79, 170–176. Shen, Z., Chen, X., Jia, J., Qu, L., & Wang, W. (2007). Comparison of electrokinetic soil remediation methods using one fixed anode and approaching anodes. Environmental Pollution, 150, 193–199. Vengris, T., Binkienė, R., & Sveikauskaitė, A. (2001). Electrokinetic remediation of lead-, zinc- and cadmium-contaminated soil. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 76, 1165–1170. Virkutyte, J., Sillanpää, M., & Latostenmaa, P. (2002). Electrokinetic soil remediation—critical overview. Science of the Total Environment, 289, 97–121. Yeung, A. T. (2006). Contaminant extractability by electrokinetics. Environmental Engineering and Science, 23, 202–224. Yeung, A. T., & Gu, Y. Y. (2011). A review on techniques to enhance electrochemical remediation of contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 195, 11–29. Yeung, A. T., Hsu, C., & Menon, R. M. (1996). EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction of lead. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122, 666–673. Zhou, D. M., Deng, C. F., & Cang, L. (2004). Electrokinetic remediation of a Cu contaminated red soil by conditioning catholyte pH with different enhancing chemical reagents. Chemosphere, 56, 265–273.