Electronic Markets on academic supply chains

Alt, R., & Militzer-Horstmann, C. (2017). Electronic Markets on the media industry. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 1–5. doi:10.1007/s12525-017-0246-5. Alt, R., Militzer-Horstmann, C., & Zimmermann, H.-D. (2015a). Editorial 25/1: 25 years of electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 25(1), 1–5. doi:10.1007/s12525-015-0185-y. Alt, R., Militzer-Horstmann, C., & Zimmermann, H.-D. (2015b). Electronic Markets on reviewing. Electronic Markets, 25(4), 255–261. doi:10.1007/s12525-015-0207-9. Bailey, C. D., Hair Jr., J. F., Hermanson, D. R., & Crittenden, V. L. (2012). Marketing academics’ perceptions of the peer review process. Marketing Education Review, 22(3), 263–278. Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914–923. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001. De Hon, F. (2015). From submission to sharing: the life cycle of an article. November 2015, https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/tutorials-and-resources/from-submission-to-sharing-the-life-cycle-of-an-article. Gretzel, U., Sigala, M., Xiang, Z., & Koo, C. (2015). Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electronic Markets, 25(3), 179–188. doi:10.1007/s12525-015-0196-8. Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2015). Publication cycle: a case study of the Public Library of Science (PLOS). https://www.authorea.com/users/2013/articles/36067/_show_article. Accessed 13 March 2017. Ives, B. (1993). Cycle-time reduction for disseminating scholarly research. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), xxi–xxiii. Kingsley, D. (2006). Open access publishing: a solution to the serials crisis? Australasian Science, 27(2), 34–36. Klaus, P. (2009). Logistics research: a 50 years’ march of ideas. Logistics Research, 1(1), 53–65. doi:10.1007/s12159-008-0009-y. Lambert, C. (2015). The “wild west” of academic publishing. Harvard Magazine, January–February 2015, pp. 56–83. Lambert, D., García-Dastugue, S., & Croxton, K. (2005). An evaluation of process-oriented supply chain management frameworks. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 25–51. doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00193.x. Lugmayr, A. (2017). Information systems research in the media industry. Electronic Markets, 27(2), 7–8. doi:10.1007/s12525-016-0241-2. Mandviwallaa, M., Patnayakunib, R., & Schuff, D. (2008). Improving the peer review process with information technology. Decision Support Systems, 46(1), 29–40. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.04.005. Markovitch, S., & Willmott, P. (2014). Accelerating the digitization of business processes. Digital McKinsey, McKinsey&Company, http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/accelerating-the-digitization-of-business-processes. Accessed 13 March 2017. Matt, C., Hoerndlein, C., & Hess, T. (2017). Let the crowd be my peers? How researchers assess the prospects of social peer review. Electronic Markets, 27(2). doi:10.1007/s12525-017-0247-4. Moad, J. (1998). FedEx tracks customers on the move. PC Week, 15(48), 110. Naslund, D., & Williamson, S. (2010). What is management in supply chain management? - a critical review of definitions, frameworks and terminology. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 11(4), 11–28. Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D., & Ladkin, A. (2015). Smart technologies for personalized experiences: a case study in the hospitality domain. Electronic Markets, 25(3), 243–254. doi:10.1007/s12525-015-0182-1. Panitch, J.M. & Michalak, S. (2005). The serials crisis. A white paper for the UNC-Chapel Hill scholarly communications convocation, January, 2005. Ponte, D., Mierzejewska, B., & Klein, S. (2017). The transformation of the academic publishing market: multiple perspectives on innovation. Electronic Markets, 27(2). doi:10.1007/s12525-017-0250-9. Price, S., & Flach, P. A. (2017). Computational support for academic peer review: a perspective from artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM, 60(3), 70–79. doi:10.1145/2979672. Prockl, G., Bhakoo, V., & Wong, C. (2017). Supply chains and electronic markets - impulses for value co-creation across the disciplines. Electronic Markets, 27(2). doi:10.1007/s12525-017-0253-6. Spier, R. (2002). The history of the peer-review process. Trends in Biotechnology, 20(8), 357–358. doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01985-6. West, J. D., Bergstrom, T., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2014). Cost effectiveness of open access publications. Economic Inquiry, 52(4), 1315–1321. doi:10.1111/ecin.12117. Zmud, B. (1997). Reducing the cycle-time of the MIS Quarterly's review process. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), xxxv–xxxix.