Efficient Tax Competition with Factor Mobility and Trade: A Note

International Tax and Public Finance - Tập 8 - Trang 171-188 - 2001
Giampaolo Arachi1
1Istituto di Economia Politica, Universitá Commerciale L. Bocconi, Milano, Italy

Tóm tắt

This note shows that residence- and source-based taxes on capital income are not sufficient to sustain an efficient Nash equilibrium when several goods are internationally traded, apart from two special cases. With several traded commodities, domestic fiscal policies affect foreign welfare not only through changes in the world interest rate but also through changes in the equilibrium relative prices of traded commodities. In order to guarantee the existence of an efficient Nash equilibrium in the general case, additional tax instruments are required. In particular, destination-based taxes on traded commodities are needed to enable the government to control the relative commodity prices faced by domestic consumers. In addition, in order to shield domestic producers from changes in world prices, the government must levy either origin-based commodity taxes or taxes on the immobile factors.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arachi, G. (1997). “Tax Competition with Factor Mobility and Trade,” unpublished manuscript, Università Bocconi, Milano. Bucovetsky, S. and J. D. Wilson. (1991). “Tax Competition with Two Tax Instruments.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, 333–350. Fuest, C. and B. Huber. (1998). “Can Tax Coordination Work?” Forthcoming in Finanzarchiv. Gordon, R. H. (1983). “An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 567–586. Haufler, A. (1996). “Optimal Factor and Commodity Taxation in a Small Open Economy.” International Tax and Public Finance 3, 425–442. Kanbur, R. and M. Keen. (1993). “Jeux Sans Frontiéres: Tax Competition and Tax Coordination When Countries Differ in Size.” American Economic Review 83, 877–892. Kehoe, P. J. (1989). “Policy Cooperation Among Benevolent Governments May Be Undesirable.” Review of Economic Studies 56, 289–296. Mintz, J. and H. Tulkens. (1986). “Commodity Tax Competition Between Member States of a Federation-Equilibrium and Efficiency.” Journal of Public Economics 29, 133–172. Razin, A. and E. Sadka. (1991). “International Tax Competition and Gains from Tax Harmonization.” Economics Letters 37, 69–76. Wilson, J. D. (1986). “A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition.” Journal of Urban Economics 19, 296–315. Wilson, J. D. (1987). “Trade, Capital Mobility, and Tax Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 95, 835–856. Wilson, J. D. (1991). “Tax Competition with Interregional Differences in Factor Endowments.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, 423–451. Zodrow, G. Z. and P. Mieszkowski. (1986). “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods.” Journal of Urban Economics 19, 356–370.