Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review

Journal of Clinical Periodontology - Tập 41 Số s15 - 2014
Francesco Cairo1,2,3,4,5,6, Michele Nieri2,3, Umberto Pagliaro7
1Address:
2Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Tuscan School of Dental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
3Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Tuscan School of Dental Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
4Francesco Cairo
5Italy
6Via Fra' Giovanni Angelico 51
7Private Practice, Campi Bisenzio-Florence, Florence, Italy

Tóm tắt

AbstractBackground

The aim of this Systematic Review (SR) was to assess the clinical efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized gingival recessions (Rec) with or without inter‐dental clinical attachment loss (iCAL).

Material and Methods

Electronic and hand searches were performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on treatment of single gingival recessions with at least 6 months of follow‐up. Primary outcome variable was complete root coverage (CRC). Secondary outcome variables were recession reduction (RecRed) and keratinized tissue (KT) gain. To evaluate treatment effect, Odds Ratios were combined for dichotomous data and mean differences in continuous data using a random‐effect model.

Results

Fifty‐one RCTs (53 articles) with a total of 1574 treated patients (1744 recessions) were included in this SR. Finally, 30 groups of comparisons were identified and a total of 80 meta‐analyses were performed. Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) was associated with higher probability of CRC and higher amount of RecRed than Semilunar Coronal Positioned Flap (SCPF). The combination CAF plus Connective Tissue Graft (CAF+CTG) or CAF plus Enamel Matrix Derivative (CAF+EMD) was more effective than CAF alone in terms of CRC and RecRed. The combination CAF plus Collagen Matrix (CAF+CM) achieved higher RecRed than CAF alone. In addition, CAF+CTG achieved CRC more frequently than CAF+EMD, SCPF, Free Gingival Graft (FGG) and Laterally Positioned Flap (LPS). CAF+CTG was also associated with higher RecRed than Barrier Membranes (CAF+GTR), CAF+EMD and CAF+CM. GTR was not able to improve the clinical efficacy of CAF. Studies adding Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) under CAF showed a large heterogeneity and not significant benefits compared with CAF alone. Multiple combinations, using more than a single graft/biomaterial under the flap, usually provide similar or less benefits than simpler, control procedures in term of root coverage outcomes.

Conclusions

CAF procedures alone or with CTG, EMD are supported by large evidence in modern periodontal plastic surgery. CAF+CTG achieved the best clinical outcomes in single gingival recessions with or without iCAL.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abolfazli N., 2009, A comparative study of the long term results of root coverage with connective tissue graft or enamel matrix protein: 24‐month results, Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 1, E304

10.1902/jop.2001.72.8.998

10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01381.x

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01851.x

10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.989

Barros R.R.M., 2013, A modified surgical flap for root coverage in association with grafting materials, European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry

10.1902/jop.2009.080498

10.1902/jop.1999.70.2.123

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01903.x

10.1902/jop.2006.77.1.7

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01346.x

10.1902/jop.2004.75.8.1137

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00969.x

10.1902/jop.2004.75.3.413

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00831.x

Dodge J. R., 2000, Improved bone regeneration and root coverage using a resorbable membrane with fisically assisted cell migration and DFDBA, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 20, 399

Haghighati F., 2009, A comparative study of two root‐coverage techniques with regard to interdental papilla dimension as a prognostic factor, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 29, 179

10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1768

10.1902/jop.1993.64.4.315

Jankovic S., 2010, The coronally advanced flap in combination with platelet‐rich fibrin (PRF) and enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of gingival recession: a comparative study, European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, 5, 260

Jankovic S., 2012, Use of platelet‐rich fibrin membrane following treatment of gingival recession: a randomized clinical trial, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 32, 41

10.1902/jop.2009.090530

10.1902/jop.1998.69.3.383

10.1111/jcpe.12019

10.1902/jop.2007.060428

10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.210

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00706.x

10.1902/jop.2003.74.2.168

10.1902/jop.2007.070074

10.1902/jop.2009.080502

10.1902/jop.2010.090698

10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1110

10.1902/jop.2000.71.11.1693

10.1902/jop.2010.100434

10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb01184.x

10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.53

10.1902/jop.2002.73.11.1299

10.1902/jop.2006.050390

Rasperini G., 2011, Subepithelial connective tissue graft for treatment of gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 31, 133

Ricci G., 1996, A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 16, 539

10.1902/jop.2000.72.9.1258

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01582.x

10.1902/jop.2010.090237

10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1871

10.1902/jop.2002.73.12.1405

10.1902/jop.2000.71.2.299

10.1902/jop.2004.75.11.1446

10.1902/jop.1998.69.11.1271

10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1301

10.1902/jop.2005.76.6.881

10.1902/jop.2004.75.1.44

10.1902/jop.1998.69.2.138

10.1111/jcpe.12002

10.1902/jop.2003.74.10.1520

10.1902/jop.1989.60.6.316

10.1902/annals.1996.1.1.702

10.1111/jcpe.12028

10.1902/jop.1978.49.7.357

10.1902/jop.1980.51.3.167

10.1902/jop.2010.100278

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01732.x

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01267.x

10.1902/jop.2009.080565

10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.007

10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0158

10.1902/jop.2011.110382

10.1902/jop.2010.090540

10.1002/14651858.CD007161.pub2

10.1111/j.1600-0765.2007.00971.x

10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.741

10.1093/ije/31.1.140

Espinel M. C., 1981, Comparison of the results obtained with the laterally positioned pedicle sliding flap‐revised technique and the lateral sliding flap with a free gingival graft technique in the treatment of localized gingival recessions, International Journal Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 1, 30

10.1016/0895-4356(92)90054-Q

10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70025-8

10.1902/jop.2005.76.11.1814

10.1016/j.jebdp.2007.01.001

10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.470

10.1902/jop.1978.49.9.457

10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD

Higgins J. P. T, 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0

10.1902/jop.2006.060107

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01348.x

10.1016/S1878-3317(10)60011-3

10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136

10.1902/jop.2012.110373

Miller P. D., 1985, A classification of marginal tissue recession, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 5, 8

Miller P. D., 1993, Concept of periodontal plastic surgery, Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry, 5, 15

10.1136/bmj.b2535

10.1902/jop.1977.48.11.681

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01789.x

10.1111/jcpe.12114

10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.303

10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.709

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01744.x

10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.11.x

10.1111/jre.12039

Wennström J. L, 1994, Proceedings of the 1th European Workshop on Periodontology, 193

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Tập 41 Số s15

Thông tin tác giả