Effects of discount framing in comparative price advertising

SallyMcKechnie1, JamesDevlin1, ChristineEnnew1, AndrewSmith1
1Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe objective of this paper is to examine the framing effects of discount presentation format in comparative price advertising in a low‐price and a high‐price product context. In particular, the authors study whether identical discounts presented in percentage and absolute terms result in different consumer perceptions of transaction value and purchase intention. Although price promotions have been the subject of previous research, a closer examination of the potential moderating influence of discount size in both contexts is warranted.Design/methodology/approachTwo separate experiments were designed to isolate the effects of the manner in which discounts are numerically expressed and the size of the discount on consumers' perceptions of a retail price promotion in a low‐price and a high‐price product context.FindingsThe effects of discount framing in comparative price promotions are found to be influenced by discount size in the case of the low‐product context but not the high‐price one.Research limitations/implicationsIt is recommended that the study be replicated for other types of low‐price and high‐price products to confirm the generalisability of the results for each product context.Practical implicationsRetail managers' choice of discount presentation format for both low‐ and high‐price product contexts, and in the case of the former the additional manipulation of discount size, have an impact on the ability of comparative price promotions to accelerate purchases. Meanwhile policy makers should continue to assign significant time and resources to investigating concerns about misleading price comparison based promotions.Originality/valueThe paper provides original insights into the importance of considering the joint effects of discount presentation format and discount size on consumers' perceptual and behavioural responses to retail price promotions, unlike previous research, which has examined these framing effects separately.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aditya, R.N. (2001), “The psychology of deception in marketing: a conceptual framework for research and practice”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 7, pp. 735‐61.

Berkowitz, E.N. and Walton, J.R. (1980), “Contextual influences on consumer price responses: an experimental analysis”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 349‐58.

Blair, E.A. and Landon, E.L. Jr (1981), “The effects of reference prices in retail advertisements”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 61‐9.

Carlson, J.P., Bearden, W.O. and Hardesty, D.M. (2007), “Influences on what consumers know and what they think they know regarding marketer pricing tactics”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 117‐42.

Chandrashekaran, R. (2004), “The influence of redundant comparison prices and other price presentation formats on consumers' evaluations and purchase intentions”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 80 No. 1, pp. 53‐66.

Chandrashekaran, R. and Grewal, D. (2003), “Assimilation of advertised reference prices: the moderating role of involvement”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 79 No. 1, pp. 53‐62.

Chen, S.‐F.S., Monroe, K.B. and Lou, Y.‐C. (1998), “The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers' perceptions and purchase intentions”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 74 No. 3, pp. 333‐72.

Compeau, L.D. and Grewal, D. (1998), “Comparative advertising: an integrative review”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 257‐73.

Das, P.R. (1992), “Semantic cues and buyer evaluation of promotional communication”, in Leone, R.P. and Kumar, V. (Eds), AMA Winter Educators' Conference Proceedings: Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 12‐17.

Della Bitta, A.J., Monroe, K.B. and McGinnis, J.M. (1981), “Consumer perceptions of comparative price advertisements”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 416‐27.

Devlin, J., Ennew, C., McKechnie, S. and Smith, A. (2007), “A study of comparison price advertising incorporating a time‐limited offer”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 280‐5.

Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Frisch, D. (1993), “Reasons for framing effects”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 399‐429.

Gendall, P., Hoek, J., Pope, T. and Young, K. (2006), “Message framing effects on price discounting”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 15 No. 7, pp. 458‐65.

Gotlieb, J.B. and Swan, J.E. (1990), “An application of the elaboration likelihood model”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 221‐8.

Grewal, D. and Compeau, L.D. (1992), “Comparative price advertising: informative or deceptive?”, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 52‐62.

Grewal, D. and Marmorstein, H. (1994), “Market price variation, perceived price variation, and consumers' price search decisions for durable goods”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 453‐60.

Grewal, D., Marmorstein, H. and Sharma, A. (1996), “Communicating price information through semantic cues: the moderating effects of situation and discount sizes”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 148‐55.

Grewal, D., Monroe, K.B. and Krishnan, R. (1998), “The effects of price‐comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value and behavioral intentions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 46‐59.

Gupta, S. and Cooper, L.G. (1992), “The discounting of discounts and promotion thresholds”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 401‐11.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New York, NY.

Hardesty, D.M. and Bearden, W.O. (2003), “Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: the moderating role of promotional benefit level”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 79 No. 1, pp. 17‐25.

Hasseldine, J. and Hite, P.A. (2006), “Framing, gender and tax compliance”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 517‐33.

Heath, T.B., Chatterjee, S. and France, K.R. (1995), “Mental accounting and changes in price: the frame dependence of reference dependence”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 90‐7.

Iacobucci, D. (1994), “Analysis of experimental data”, in Bagozzi, R.P. (Ed.), Principles of Market Research, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 224‐78.

(The) Independent (2008), “Price cuts likely to continue”, December 28, available at: www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/price‐cuts‐likely‐to‐continue‐1215341.html (accessed 9 January 2009).

Inman, J.J., Peter, A.C. and Raghubir, P. (1997), “Framing the deal: the role of restrictions in accentuating deal value”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 68‐79.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), “Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk”, Econometrica, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 263‐91.

Krishna, A., Briesch, R., Lehmann, D.R. and Yuan, H. (2002), “A meta‐analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 78 No. 2, pp. 101‐18.

Levin, I.P., Schneider, S.L. and Gaeth, G.J. (1998), “All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 149‐88.

Lichtenstein, D.R., Burton, S. and Karson, E.J. (1991), “The effects of semantic cues on consumer perceptions of reference price ads”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 380‐91.

Liefeld, J. and Heslop, L.A. (1985), “Reference prices and deception in newspaper advertising”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 868‐76.

Monroe, K.B. (1971), “Measuring price thresholds by psychophysics and latitudes of acceptance”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 460‐4.

Monroe, K.B. (1990), Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Monroe, K.B. and Chapman, J.D. (1987), “Framing effects on buyer's subjective product evaluations”, in Wallendorf, M. and Anderson, P. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 193‐7.

Ozanne, J.L., Brucks, M.L. and Grewal, D. (1992), “A study of information search behaviour during the categorization of new products”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 452‐63.

Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. and Schumann, D. (1983), “Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 135‐46.

Rajendran, K.N. and Tellis, G.J. (1994), “Contextual and temporal components of reference price”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 22‐34.

Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R. and Wrightsman, L.S. (1991), “Criteria for scale selection and evaluation”, in Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R. and Wrightsman, L.S. (Eds), Measures of Personality and Social Pychological Attitudes, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 1‐16.

Sinha, I. and Smith, M.F. (2000), “Consumers' perceptions of promotional framing of price”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 257‐75.

Thaler, R. (1985), “Mental accounting and consumer choice”, Marketing Science, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 199‐214.

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974), “Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases”, Science, Vol. 185 No. 4157, pp. 1124‐30.

Urbany, J.E. and Bearden, W.O. (1989), “Reference price effects on perceptions of perceived offer value, normal prices, and transaction utility”, 1989 Educators' Conference Proceedings, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL.

Urbany, J.E. and Dickson, P.R. (1991), “Consumer normal price estimation”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 54‐61.

Urbany, J.E., Bearden, W.O. and Weilbaker, D.C. (1988), “The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference prices on consumer perceptions and price search”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 95‐110.

Varadarajan, P.R. (1984), “Consumer responses to small business coupon sales promotions”, American Journal of Small Business, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 17‐27.