Effects of Language Intensity Similarity on Perceptions of Credibility Relational Attributions, and Persuasion

Journal of Language and Social Psychology - Tập 12 Số 3 - Trang 224-238 - 1993
R. Kelly Aune1, Toshiyuki Kikuchi2
1University of Hawaii at Manoa
2University of Arizona

Tóm tắt

Communication accommodation theory was used to predict relationships between the degree of similarity of a source's and receiver's use of language intensity and attributions made about the source of a message. A sample of 286 respondents, whose use of language intensity had been assessed, read a persuasive message written with either high or low language intensity. Actual similarity between respondents'and stimulus language intensity was positively correlated withperceptions of source credibility (sociability /character, extraversion) and immediacy, and negatively correlated with arousal. Perceived similarity in language intensity was also positively correlated with credibility perceptions (competence, sociabilityy/character, composure), as well as immediacy and intimacy, and negatively correlated with arousal. Both actual and perceived similarity were associated with increased message agreement. Actual and perceived language intensity similarity were weakly correlated. In all analyses perceived similarity in language intensity was the stronger predictor of source attributions. Possible message processing differences arising from perceived and actual language intensity similarity are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/10510979109368346

10.1080/03637756309375380

10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00639.x

10.1080/03637757809375947

10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00159.x

Buller, D. B., 1992, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 56, 37, 10.1080/10570319209374400

10.1080/01463378309369519

10.1080/03637758409390195

10.1080/03637758709390214

Burgoon, M., 1989, Message effects in communication science, 129

Burgoon, M. & Burgoon, J. K (1985). An empirical investigation of attitude measurement techniques. Unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona, Department of Communication.

Burgoon, M., 1975, Human Communication Research, 1, 224

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60076-3

10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00123.x

10.1111/j.1468-2958.1987.tb00115.x

10.1017/S0047404500007752

Coupland, N., 1984, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 49

10.1016/0271-5309(85)90007-2

10.1016/0271-5309(88)90015-8

Dabbs, J. M., 1969, Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, 337

10.1080/00223980.1975.9915748

Giles, H., 1991, Language: Contexts and consequences

10.1080/23808985.1987.11678638

Giles, H., 1979, Language and social psychology, 45

10.1037/h0042184

Kamakahi, R., Kai, S., Kang, L. & Tom, C. (1992). [Replication of the Jones and Thurstone semantic intensity study]. Unpublished raw data.

10.1016/0090-2616(84)90025-1

10.2307/3033875

10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80113-0

10.3758/BF03208096

Mehrabian, A., 1981, Silent messages, 2

10.1111/j.1468-2958.1974.tb00252.x

McCroskey, J. C., annual meeting of the International Communication Association

10.1080/10510978109368075

Miller, M. D., annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association

10.1080/03637758709390218

10.1037/h0047078

Putman, W. B., 1984, International Journal of Sociology of Language, 46, 97

10.1080/03637758209376091

10.1177/0261927X8300200103

Street, R. L., Jr., 1982, Social cognition and communication, 193

10.1177/001872676001300206

Welkowitz, J., 1969, Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, 343

Welkowitz, J., 1970, Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of theAmerican Psychological Association, 5, 387

10.2466/pms.1972.35.3.715

10.1037/h0035328