Effect of increasing progesterone concentration from Day 3 of pregnancy on subsequent embryo survival and development in beef heifers

Reproduction, Fertility and Development - Tập 20 Số 3 - Trang 368 - 2008
Fin Carter1, Niamh Forde1, Patrick E. Duffy1, Michael G. Wade1, Trudee Fair1, M.A. Crowe1, A.C.O. Evans1, D.A. Kenny1, J. F. Roche1, P. Lonergan1
1School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, College of Life Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Tóm tắt

Higher systemic progesterone in the immediate post-conception period is associated with an increase in embryonic growth rate, interferon-tau production and pregnancy rate in cattle. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of increasing progesterone concentration on Day 3 on subsequent embryo survival and development. Oestrus (Day 0) was synchronised in beef-cross heifers (n = 210) and approximately two-thirds of the heifers were inseminated with semen from a proven sire, while the remainder were not inseminated. In order to produce animals with divergent progesterone concentrations, half of the animals received a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) on Day 3 of the oestrous cycle, which was left in situ until slaughter. The four treatment groups were: (i) pregnant, high progesterone; (ii) pregnant, normal progesterone; (iii) non-pregnant, high progesterone; and (iv) non-pregnant, normal progesterone. Animals were blood-sampled twice daily from Days 0 to 8 and once daily thereafter until slaughter on Days 5, 7, 13 or 16, corresponding to the 16-cell stage, the blastocyst stage, the beginning of elongation and the day of maternal recognition of pregnancy, respectively. Embryos were recovered by flushing the tract with phosphate-buffered saline and characterised by stage of development and, in the case of Days 13 and 16, measured. Data were analysed by mixed models ANOVA, Chi-square analysis and Student’s t-test where appropriate. Insertion of a PRID on Day 3 increased (P < 0.05) progesterone concentrations from Day 3.5 onwards. There was no difference between treatments in the proportion of embryos at the expected stage of development on Days 5 or 7 (P > 0.05). While not significantly different, the proportion of viable embryos recovered was numerically greater in the high progesterone group on both Day 13 (58 v. 43%) and Day 16 (90 v. 50%). Elevation of progesterone significantly increased embryonic length on Day 13 (2.24 ± 0.51 mm v. 1.15 ± 0.16 mm, P = 0.034) and Day 16 (14.06 ± 1.18 cm v. 5.97 ± 1.18 cm, P = 0.012). In conclusion, insertion of a PRID on Day 3 of the oestrous cycle increased serum progesterone concentrations on subsequent days, which, while having no phenotypic effect on embryonic development on Days 5 or 7, was associated with an increase in embryonic size on Days 13 and 16.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ashworth, 1989, J. Reprod. Fertil., 87, 23, 10.1530/jrf.0.0870023

Ball, 1997, Anim. Breeding Abs., 65, 167

Bauersachs, 2006, Reproduction, 132, 319, 10.1530/rep.1.00996

Betteridge, 1988, Theriogenology, 29, 155, 10.1016/0093-691X(88)90038-6

Betteridge, 1980, J. Reprod. Fertil., 59, 205, 10.1530/jrf.0.0590205

Chagas e Silva, 2005, Theriogenology, 64, 49, 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.019

Clemente, 2008, Reprod. Fertil. Dev.

Diskin, 2006, Anim. Reprod. Sci., 96, 297, 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.08.008

Dunne, 2000, Anim. Reprod. Sci., 58, 39, 10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00088-3

Ferguson, 2005, Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 17, 219, 10.1071/RDv17n2Ab136

Garrett, 1988, J. Reprod. Fertil., 84, 437, 10.1530/jrf.0.0840437

Goff, 1998, Theriogenology, 49, 1021, 10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00050-8

Gray, 2006, Biol. Reprod., 74, 383, 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046656

Grealy, 1996, J. Reprod. Fertil., 107, 229, 10.1530/jrf.0.1070229

Green, 2005, Anim. Reprod. Sci., 88, 179, 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.12.007

Hansen, 2002, J. Anim. Sci., 80, E33, 10.2527/animalsci2002.80E-Suppl_2E33x

Inskeep, 2004, J. Anim. Sci., 82, E24, 10.2527/2004.8213_supplE24x

Kerbler, 1997, Theriogenology, 47, 703, 10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00028-9

Klein, 2006, Biol. Reprod., 74, 253, 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046748

Larson, 2007, Anim. Reprod. Sci., 102, 172, 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.02.023

Lonergan, 2007, Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 19, 861, 10.1071/RD07089

Mann, 1999, Reprod. Domest. Anim., 34, 269, 10.1111/j.1439-0531.1999.tb01250.x

Mann, 2001, Reproduction, 121, 175, 10.1530/rep.0.1210175

Mann, 2006, Vet. J., 171, 500, 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.12.005

McNeill, 2006, Theriogenology, 65, 1435, 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.08.015

Merlo, 2007, Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 19, 211, 10.1071/RDv19n1Ab189

Morris, 2000, Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 12, 39, 10.1071/RD00008

Peters, 1996, Anim. Breeding Abs., 64, 587

Reggio, 1997, Theriogenology, 47, 284, 10.1016/S0093-691X(97)82411-9

Rings, 2008, Reprod. Fertil. Dev.

Robinson, 1989, J. Dairy Sci., 72, 202, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79098-6

Roche, 1985, Vet. Rec., 116, 153, 10.1136/vr.116.6.153

Santos, 2001, J. Anim. Sci., 79, 2881, 10.2527/2001.79112881x

Satterfield, 2006, Biol. Reprod., 75, 289, 10.1095/biolreprod.106.052944

Silke, 2002, Anim. Reprod. Sci., 71, 1, 10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00016-7

Song, 2005, Endocrinology, 146, 4825, 10.1210/en.2005-0768

Spencer, 2007, Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 19, 65, 10.1071/RD06102

Sreenan, 1983, Vet. Rec., 112, 517, 10.1136/vr.112.22.517

Starbuck, 1999, Cattle Pract., 7, 397

Starbuck, 2006, Theriogenology, 66, 383, 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.12.003

Stevenson, 1991, J. Dairy Sci., 74, 3849, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78577-9

Stronge, 2005, Theriogenology, 64, 1212, 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.007

Van Cleeff, 1991, Theriogenology, 36, 795, 10.1016/0093-691X(91)90345-E

Van Cleeff, 1996, Theriogenology, 46, 1117, 10.1016/S0093-691X(96)00284-1