Effect of Writing-to-Learn Strategy on Undergraduates’ Conceptual Understanding of Electrostatics
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akkus, R., Gunel, M., & Hand, B. (2007). Comparing an inquiry based approach known as the Science Writing Heuristic to traditional science teaching practices: are there differences? International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1745–1765.
Allie, S., Buffler, A., Kaunda, L., & Inglis, M. (1997). Writing-intensive physics laboratory reports: task and assessment. The Physics Teacher, 35, 399–405.
Atasoy, E. (2012). The examination of writing based activities in mathematics from the perspectives of learning and teaching. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Trabzon, Turkey. (In Turkish).
Bagno, E., & Eylon, B. S. (1997). From problem solving to a knowledge structure: an example from domain of electromagnetism. Am J Phys, 65(8), 726–736.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58.
Baser, M., & Geban, Ö. (2007). Effect of instruction based on conceptual change activities on students’ understanding of static electricity concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2), 243–267.
Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564–577.
Çalık, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2010). Investigating the effectiveness of usage of different methods embedded with four-step constructivist teaching strategy. The Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), 32–48.
Criado, A. M., & García-Carmona, A. (2010). Prospective teachers’ difficulties in interpreting elementary phenomena of electrostatics interactions: indicators of the status of their intuitive ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 769–805.
Demaree, D. (2007). Measuring the effect of written feedback on writing. Paper presented at the Physics Education Research Conference, American Institute of Physics, Greensboro, 1–2 August, 2007. pp 81–84.
Fellows, N. J. (1994). A window into thinking: using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning. Journal of Science Teaching, 31, 985–1001.
Günel, M., Kabataş Memiş, E., & Büyükkasap, E. (2010). Effects of the science writing heuristic approach on primary school students’ science achievement and attitude toward science course. Education and Science, 35(155), 49–62.
Guruswamy, C., Somars, M. D., & Hussey, R. G. (1997). Students’ understanding of the transfer of charge between conductors. Physics Education, 32, 91–96.
Hand, B., Hohenshell, L., & Prain, V. (2007a). Examining the effect of multiple writing tasks on Year 10 biology students’ understandings of cell and molecular biology concepts. Instructional Science, 35, 343–373.
Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2002). Teachers implementing Writing-to-Learn strategies in junior secondary science: a case study. Science Education, 86, 737–755.
Hand, B., Prain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021–1035.
Hand, B., Wallace, C. W., & Yang, E.-M. (2004). Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131–149.
Hand, B., Yang, O. E.-M., & Bruxvoort, C. (2007b). Using writing-to-learn science strategies to improve year 11 students’ understandings of stoichiometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 125–143.
Harmelink, K. (1998). Learning the write way. The Science Teacher, 65(1), 36–38.
Hein, T. L. (1999). Using writing to confront student misconceptions in physics. European Journal of Physics, 20, 137–141.
Hohenshell, L. M., & Hand, B. (2006). Writing-to-learn strategies in secondary school cell biology: a mixed method study. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), 261–289.
Kalman, C. S. (2011). Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by engaging science text with reflective writing as a hermeneutical circle. Science & Education, 20, 159–172.
Klein, P. D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11(3), 203–270.
Klein, P. D. (2004). Constructing scientific explanations through writing. Instructional Science, 32, 191–231.
Larkin, T. L. (2011). Assessment of student understanding in physics: An integrated qualitative and quantitative approach. Electronic proceedings of the annual conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Washington, DC, 2011.
Maloney, D. P., O’kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & Heuvelen, A. V. (2001). Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. Physics Education Research, 69(7), 12–23.
Mason, L. (1998). Sharing cognition to construct scientific knowledge in school context: the role of oral and written discourse. Instructional Science, 25(5), 359–389.
Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2000). Writing and conceptual change. What changes? Instructional Science, 28, 199–226.
Nückles, M., Hübner, S., Dümer, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effects in writing-to-learn. Instructional Science, 38, 237–258.
Park, J., Kim, I., Kim, M., & Lee, M. (2001). Analysis of students’ processes of confirmation and falsification of their prior ideas about electrostatics. International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1219–1236.
Prain, V. (2006). Learning from writing in secondary science: some theoretical and practical implications. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2), 179–201.
Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: rethinking practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 609–626.
Redish, E. F., Saul, J., & Steinberg, R. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66(3), 212–224.
Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969–983.
Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: an exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566–593.
Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student behavior and epistemological framing: examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 147–174.
Şekercioğlu, A. G. (2011). The effect of peer instruction method on prospective teachers’ conceptual understanding and their attitude toward electrostatics. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Balikesir, Turkey. (In Turkish).
Singh, C. (2006). Student understanding of symmetry and Gauss’s law of electricity. American Journal of Physics, 74(10), 923–936.
Swafford, J., & Bryan, J. K. (2000). Instructional strategies for promoting conceptual change: supporting middle school students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16, 139–161.
Wang, J.-R., Chen, S.-F., Tsay, R.-F., Chou, C.-T., Lin, S.-W., & Kao, H.-L. (2011). Development of an instrument for assessing elementary school students’ written expression in science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(2), 276–290.
Yang, S.-H. (2011). Exploring the effectiveness of using peer evaluation and teacher feedback in college students’ writing. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 144–150.