Effect of Lead Use on Back and Shoulder Postural Muscle Activity in Healthy Young Adults

Human Factors - Tập 53 Số 6 - Trang 729-739 - 2011
Daniel D. Johnson1, Anne E. Kirkpatrick1, James A. Ashton‐Miller1, Albert J. Shih1
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Tóm tắt

Objective: The primary goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that wearing the 3.7 kg vest portion of a radiological shielding garment (a “lead”) significantly increases lower back and shoulder muscle activity in quasistatic erect and forward-flexed postures. Secondarily, the authors examined the effects of gender and forward-flexed posture as well as their interactions with lead use. Background: The use of a lead is mandatory for interventionalists during surgical procedures. Because the vest portion of a lead weighs considerably more than normal clothing, there is concern that its use increases the risk of developing back and shoulder pain. Method: In a repeated-measures study design, 19 young healthy male and female adults assumed standardized erect or forward-flexed postures, both with and without wearing the vest portion of a lead. Shoulder and lower back muscle activity was measured via surface electromyography, normalized by maximum voluntary contraction values. Data were analyzed using general linear models and repeated-measures ANOVA (significant for p < .05). Results: Use of the lead did not result in a significant increase in muscle activity in the lower back or shoulders, despite perceived increases in effort and discomfort. Posture proved to be the most significant secondary factor affecting activity in the lower back, and participant gender proved insignificant. Conclusion: Short-term use of the lead does not appear to contribute to the incidence of back pain or injury in interventionalists. Avoiding flexed postures could more directly reduce the likelihood of pain or injury. Application: Potential applications include assessing and improving operating room ergonomics for physicians.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/0169-8141(94)90022-1

10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00052-2

10.1097/00007632-199602150-00006

10.1016/0268-0033(96)00033-2

10.1016/S0030-5898(20)30938-X

10.1007/s004649900316

10.1097/01.BRS.0000087500.70575.45

10.1016/S1350-4533(99)00054-5

10.1097/00007632-199710010-00003

10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80104-4

10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.03.013

10.1097/01.brs.0000229232.66090.58

10.1007/BF00386939

Katz J. N., 2006, Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 88, 21

10.1038/ncprheum0646

10.1001/jama.299.6.656

10.1080/00140139108967318

10.2214/ajr.158.1.1530763

10.1097/00007632-199904010-00015

10.1097/00007632-198101000-00021

Pelz D. M., 2000, American Journal of Neuroradiology, 21, 1364

10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.092101.122107

10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00678-9

10.1002/jor.1100030208

10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa6a55

10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.06.003

Sobotta J., 1974, Atlas of human anatomy, 1

10.1093/ptj/69.1.38

10.4103/0972-9941.65161

Tassinary L. G., 2000, Handbook of psychophysiology, 2, 163