Edge effects in fire‐prone landscapes: Ecological importance and implications for fauna

Ecology and Evolution - Tập 8 Số 11 - Trang 5937-5948 - 2018
Kate Parkins1, Alan York1, Julian Di Stefano1
1School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Creswick, Vic., Australia

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Edges are ecologically important environmental features and have been well researched in agricultural and urban landscapes. However, little work has been conducted in flammable ecosystems where spatially and temporally dynamic fire edges are expected to influence important processes such as recolonization of burnt areas and landscape connectivity. We review the literature on fire, fauna, and edge effects to summarize current knowledge of faunal responses to fire edges and identify knowledge gaps. We then develop a conceptual model to predict faunal responses to fire edges and present an agenda for future research. Faunal abundance at fire edges changes over time, but patterns depend on species traits and resource availability. Responses are also influenced by edge architecture (e.g., size and shape), site and landscape context, and spatial scale. However, data are limited and the influence of fire edges on both local abundance and regional distributions of fauna is largely unknown. In our conceptual model, biophysical properties interact with the fire regime (e.g., patchiness, frequency) to influence edge architecture. Edge architecture and species traits influence edge permeability, which is linked to important processes such as movement, resource selection, and species interactions. Predicting the effect of fire edges on fauna is challenging, but important for biodiversity conservation in flammable landscapes. Our conceptual model combines several drivers of faunal fire responses (biophysical properties, regime attributes, species traits) and will therefore lead to improved predictions. Future research is needed to understand fire as an agent of edge creation; the spatio‐temporal flux of fire edges across landscapes; and the effect of fire edges on faunal movement, resource selection, and biotic interactions. To aid the incorporation of new data into our predictive framework, our model has been designed as a Bayesian Network, a statistical tool capable of analyzing complex environmental relationships, dealing with data gaps, and generating testable hypotheses.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1071/WF05053

10.1139/z02-087

10.1111/aec.12404

10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02355.x

10.1007/s10980-007-9108-4

10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18765.x

10.1890/04-0923

10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.025

10.3160/0038-3872-112.2.63

10.1126/science.1163886

10.1071/WF07153

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00512.x

10.1071/WR02114

10.1007/s10980-009-9443-8

10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0717:AIASAT]2.0.CO;2

10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0750:AFFATO]2.0.CO;2

Catchpole W., 2002, Fire properties and burn patterns in heterogeneous landscapes

10.1017/S0266467402002237

10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.021

10.1007/s10980-015-0330-1

10.1002/jwmg.110

10.1111/aec.12193

10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.022

10.1071/WF10060

10.1093/jmammal/gyv034

10.1016/0306-4565(84)90001-9

10.1111/1365-2656.12221

Elia M., 2016, Response of beetle communities five years after wildfire in Mediterranean ecosystems, Redia‐Giornale Di Zoologia, 99, 107

10.1650/CONDOR-16-184.1

10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0730:IEDADM]2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01326.x

10.1890/120298

10.1017/S0266467403001093

10.1007/s00442-005-0310-2

10.1071/WF08187

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00930.x

10.1080/00049158.1975.10675618

10.1071/WR99093

10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.021

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01906.x

10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.042

10.1371/journal.pone.0137882

10.1093/jmammal/gyx010

10.1111/cobi.12384

10.1139/cjz-78-12-2174

10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02070-X

10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009

10.1071/WR15011

10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16842.x

10.1002/ajpa.20241

10.1023/A:1023673301850

10.1371/journal.pone.0109097

10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.00147.x

10.1590/S1676-06032012000300004

10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00063.x

10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6

10.1098/rspb.2010.1872

10.1371/journal.pone.0021886

10.1890/11-1034.1

10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.022

10.1073/pnas.0800375105

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00492.x

10.1890/10-2351.1

10.1071/WF09131

10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.004

10.1071/WF10076

10.1007/s10980-005-1063-3

10.1086/284889

10.1080/01650520412331333747

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130148

10.1111/1365-2664.12153

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.013

10.1007/s10531-009-9634-2

10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.002

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01947.x

10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.009

10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.6

10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00842.x

10.1016/j.actao.2003.10.007

10.1111/ele.12579

10.2307/2261046

10.1002/ece3.2824

10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.023

10.2193/2006-212

10.1007/s10980-014-0117-9

10.1371/journal.pone.0097036

10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00542.x

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01444.x

10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.000501

10.1111/j.1365-2028.1996.tb00591.x

10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.032

10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.03.001

10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.015