Ecological Patterns of nifH Genes in Four Terrestrial Climatic Zones Explored with Targeted Metagenomics Using FrameBot, a New Informatics Tool

mBio - Tập 4 Số 5 - 2013
Qiong Wang1, John F. Quensen1, Jordan Fish1, Tae Kwon Lee2, Yanni Sun3, James M. Tiedje1, James R. Cole1
1Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
2School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Computer Science and Engineering Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT Biological nitrogen fixation is an important component of sustainable soil fertility and a key component of the nitrogen cycle. We used targeted metagenomics to study the nitrogen fixation-capable terrestrial bacterial community by targeting the gene for nitrogenase reductase ( nifH ). We obtained 1.1 million nifH 454 amplicon sequences from 222 soil samples collected from 4 National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) sites in Alaska, Hawaii, Utah, and Florida. To accurately detect and correct frameshifts caused by indel sequencing errors, we developed FrameBot, a tool for frameshift correction and nearest-neighbor classification, and compared its accuracy to that of two other rapid frameshift correction tools. We found FrameBot was, in general, more accurate as long as a reference protein sequence with 80% or greater identity to a query was available, as was the case for virtually all nifH reads for the 4 NEON sites. Frameshifts were present in 12.7% of the reads. Those nifH sequences related to the Proteobacteria phylum were most abundant, followed by those for Cyanobacteria in the Alaska and Utah sites. Predominant genera with nifH sequences similar to reads included Azospirillum , Bradyrhizobium , and Rhizobium , the latter two without obvious plant hosts at the sites. Surprisingly, 80% of the sequences had greater than 95% amino acid identity to known nifH gene sequences. These samples were grouped by site and correlated with soil environmental factors, especially drainage, light intensity, mean annual temperature, and mean annual precipitation. FrameBot was tested successfully on three ecofunctional genes but should be applicable to any. IMPORTANCE High-throughput phylogenetic analysis of microbial communities using rRNA-targeted sequencing is now commonplace; however, such data often allow little inference with respect to either the presence or the diversity of genes involved in most important ecological processes. To study the gene pool for these processes, it is more straightforward to assess the genes directly responsible for the ecological function (ecofunctional genes). However, analyzing these genes involves technical challenges beyond those seen for rRNA. In particular, frameshift errors cause garbled downstream protein translations. Our FrameBot tool described here both corrects frameshift errors in query reads and determines their closest matching protein sequences in a set of reference sequences. We validated this new tool with sequences from defined communities and demonstrated the tool’s utility on nifH gene fragments sequenced from soils in well-characterized and major terrestrial ecosystem types.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

StackebrandtE EbersJ . 2006. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol. Today 33:153–155.

10.1093/nar/gkn879

10.1073/pnas.0800679105

10.1186/1471-2105-12-198

10.1093/nar/gkq747

10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195

10.1093/nar/gkr1065

10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02193.x

XuW . 2006. On integrating biological sequence analysis with metric distance based database management systems. Ph.D. thesis. University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

GuanX UberbacherEC . 1996. Alignments of DNA and protein sequences containing frameshift errors. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12:31–40.

10.1016/0167-8655(86)90013-9

10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4

10.1186/1471-2105-12-38

10.1016/S0923-2508(00)01172-4

10.1093/molbev/msh047

DufreneM LegendreP . 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67:345–366.

10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

10.1038/ismej.2009.104

10.1007/s11104-007-9476-1

10.1126/science.1139548

10.1128/AEM.65.7.3084-3094.1999

10.3389/fmicb.2013.00150

10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01261.x

10.1007/s00374-002-0452-x

10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00265.x

10.1038/nmeth0909-636

10.1128/JB.187.18.6258-6264.2005

10.1073/pnas.1217767110

10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.006

10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915

10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00451.x

10.1371/journal.pone.0042149

10.1186/2049-2618-1-8