EcoMeristem, a model of morphogenesis and competition among sinks in rice. 1. Concept, validation and sensitivity analysis

Functional Plant Biology - Tập 33 Số 4 - Trang 309 - 2006
Delphine Luquet1, Michaël Dingkuhn1, Hae Koo Kim1, L. Tambour1, Anne Clément‐Vidal1
1CIRAD, Amis Department, TA40/01Av. Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.

Tóm tắt

Because of rapid advances in functional genomics there is an increasing demand for models simulating complex traits, such as the physiological and environmental controls of plant morphology. This paper describes, validates and explores the behaviour of the structural–functional model EcoMeristem, developed for cereals in the context of the Generation Challenge Program (GCP; CGIAR). EcoMeristem constructs the plant on the basis of an organogenetic body plan, driven by intrinsic (genetic) behavioural norms of meristems. These norms consist of phenological–topological rules for organ initiation and pre-dimensioning (sink creation) and rules enabling feedbacks of the plant’s resource status on the organogenetic processes. Plant resource status is expressed by a state variable called Internal Competition Index (Ic) calculated daily as the ratio of assimilate source (supply) over the sum of active sinks (demand). Ic constitutes an internal signal analogous to sugar signalling. Ic affects potential phytomer size, tiller initiation, leaf senescence, and carbohydrate storage and mobilisation. The model was calibrated and tested on IR64 rice grown in controlled environments, and validated with field observations for the same cultivar (Philippines). Observed distributions and dynamics of soluble sugars and starch in plant organs supported the model concepts of internal competition and the role of reserves as a buffer for Ic fluctuations. Model sensitivity analyses suggested that plant growth and development depend not only on assimilate supply, but also on organogenesis-based demand. If true, this conclusion has important consequences for crop improvement strategies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrade, 1999, Crop Science, 39, 453, 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X0039000200026x

Asai, 2002, Development, 129, 265, 10.1242/dev.129.1.265

Asch, 1999, Field Crops Research, 62, 191, 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00020-9

Brisson, 1998, Agronomie, 18, 311, 10.1051/agro:19980501

Cookson, 2005, Plant, Cell & Environment, 28, 1355, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01368.x

Dauzat, 1994, Ol�agineux, 49, 81

Dingkuhn, 1995, Agricultural Systems, 48, 411, 10.1016/0308-521X(94)00028-J

Dingkuhn, 1992, Field Crops Research, 28, 235, 10.1016/0378-4290(92)90043-9

Dingkuhn, 1999, Field Crops Research, 61, 79, 10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00152-X

Dingkuhn, 2005, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56, 1289, 10.1071/AR05063

Dubcovsky, 2004, Crop Science, 44, 1895, 10.2135/cropsci2004.1895

Fournier, 2005, New Phytologist, 166, 881, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01371.x

Frey, 2004, Plant Breeding, 123, 554, 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.01033.x

Hammer, 2002, European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 15, 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00093-X

Hasegawa, 1994, Agronomy Journal, 86, 673, 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600040016x

Heyer, 2004, The Plant Journal, 39, 161, 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02124.x

Itoh, 1998, The Plant Cell, 10, 1511, 10.1105/tpc.10.9.1511

Itoh, 2005, Plant & Cell Physiology, 46, 23, 10.1093/pcp/pci501

Ji, 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 60, 615, 10.1007/s00239-004-0242-1

Jitla, 1997, Plant Physiology, 115, 15, 10.1104/pp.115.1.15

Jones, 2003, European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 235, 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7

Kiniry, 2001, Agronomy Journal, 93, 1354, 10.2134/agronj2001.1354

Kobayazi, 2002, Plant Production Science, 5, 3, 10.1626/pps.5.3

Laza, 2001, Plant Production Science, 4, 184, 10.1626/pps.4.184

Lechaudel, 2005, Tree Physiology, 5, 583, 10.1093/treephys/25.5.583

Luquet, 2005, Plant Production Science, 8, 145, 10.1626/pps.8.145

Miyoshi, 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 875, 10.1073/pnas.2636936100

Monteith, 1994, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 68, 213, 10.1016/0168-1923(94)90037-X

Moreau, 2004, Euphytica, 137, 111, 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000040508.01402.21

Munns, 1981, Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 8, 93, 10.1071/PP9810093

Murchie, 2005, Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 449, 10.1093/jxb/eri100

Nelder, 1965, Computer Journal, 7, 308, 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308

Osaki, 2001, Photosynthetica, 39, 197, 10.1023/A:1013770807583

Reynolds, 2005, Annals of Applied Biology, 146, 39, 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.03100.x

Samonte, 2001, Crop Science, 41, 902, 10.2135/cropsci2001.413902x

Schnier, 1990, Crop Science, 30, 1276, 10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000060024x

Sherson, 2003, Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 525, 10.1093/jxb/erg055

Skinner, 1995, Crop Science, 35, 4, 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500010002x

Sultan, 2005, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 128, 93, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.08.005

Sylvester, 2001, American Journal of Botany, 88, 2157, 10.2307/3558377

Tardieu, 2000, Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 1505, 10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1505

10.1006/anbo.2001.1447

Verhoerf, 1985, Remote Sensing of Environment, 17, 1666

Verma, 2004, Annals of Agricultural Research, 25, 456

Walter, 2005, Annals of Botany, 95, 891, 10.1093/aob/mci103

Wang, 2002, European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 121, 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00100-4

Wright, 2002, Plant Species Biology, 17, 119, 10.1046/j.1442-1984.2002.00082.x

Yan, 2004, Annals of Botany, 93, 591, 10.1093/aob/mch078

Yoshida, 2006, Field Crops Research