Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Declines across Publicly and Privately Held Banks

Accounting Review - Tập 77 Số 3 - Trang 547-570 - 2002
Anne Beatty1, Bin Ke1, Kathy R. Petroni2
1Pennsylvania State University
2Michigan State University

Tóm tắt

This study compares samples of publicly and privately held bank holding companies to examine whether the high frequency of small earnings increases relative to small earnings decreases reported by public firms is attributable to earnings management. We expect public banks' shareholders to be more likely than private banks' shareholders to rely on simple earnings-based heuristics in evaluating firm performance, so we expect public banks to have more incentives to report steadily increasing earnings. Consistent with this expectation, we find that relative to private banks, public banks: (1) report fewer small earnings declines, (2) are more likely to use the loan loss provision and security gain realizations to eliminate small earnings decreases, and (3) report longer strings of consecutive earnings increases. These results suggest that the asymmetric pattern of more small earnings increases than decreases, first documented by Burgstahler and Dichev (1997), is attributable to earnings management and is not simply a reflection of the underlying distribution of earnings changes.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00017-8

Allison, P. D. 1984. Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.

10.2307/2491414

10.2307/2491487

Harris, 1999, The Review of Accounting Studies, 4, 299

Beaver, W., M. McNichols, and K. Nelson. 2000. Management of the loss reserve accrual and the distribution of earnings in the property-casualty insurance industry. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Bhattacharya N., 2001, The Accounting Review, 221, 10.2308/accr.2001.76.2.221

10.1111/j.1745-6622.1992.tb00223.x

10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00017-7

10.2307/2491488

Cook R. D., 1977, Technometrics, 19, 15

Core, J., W. Guay, and R. Verrecchia. 2000. Are performance measures other than price important to CEO incentives? Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

10.1016/0304-405X(95)00850-E

10.1086/209601

10.1016/0165-4101(95)00397-2

10.2307/1914185

10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00021-X

- 2001. Why do CEOs of publicly traded firms prefer reporting small earnings increases and long strings of consecutive earnings increases? Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Kiefer N. M., 1988, Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 646

10.2307/2290085

10.1016/0165-4101(90)90027-2

Nagar, V., Petroni, K., and D. Wolfenzon. 2001. Preventing squeeze outs in close corporations. Working paper, New York University, New York, NY.

Petersen T., 1991, Sociological Methods and Research, 19, 270, 10.1177/0049124191019003002

Rogers W. H., 1993, Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19

10.1093/rfs/3.4.625

10.2307/2329497

Wahlen J., 1994, The Accounting Review, 69, 455