ESCALATION AS A REACTION TO PERSISTENT ANNOYANCE

Emerald - Tập 8 Số 3 - Trang 252-270 - 1997
Dean G.Pruitt1, John C.Parker1, Joseph M.Mikolic1
1State University of New York, Buffalo

Tóm tắt

In two experiments on reactions to persistent annoyance from another person, participants employed a very orderly verbal escalation sequence that fit a cascading Guttman scale. This began with requests and moved on to demands, and then to complaints, angry statements, threats, harassment, and abuse, in that order. The more escalated the tactic, the fewer people used it. People seldom skipped a step on the way to their most escalated tactic. Two possible explanations for this pattern seemed plausible in light of the data, that it is due to either a widely snared try‐try‐again script or a declining hierarchy of thresholds. Verbal escalation was associated with a negative view of the annoyer's character, while physical escalation was associated with blame and feelings of frustration and anger. Escalation was discouraged by membership in the same group as the annoyer. Loud noise did not encourage escalation in general but promoted the use of angry statements.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/0030-5073(84)90040-0

10.1016/0022-1031(84)90029-5

Berkowitz L., 1993, Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control

Brewer M. B., D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G, 4

10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.12

10.2307/3033557

10.1016/0092-6566(78)90079-X

10.1007/BF00991891

10.1016/0022-1031(80)90069-4

10.1037/0022-3514.32.4.706

Kryter K. D., 1970, The effects of noise on man, 2

10.1037/0033-2909.93.3.586

10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.151

Nisbett R. E., 1996, Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South

Rubin J. Z., 1994, Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement, 2

10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.364

Torgerson W. S., 1958, Theory and methods of scaling

Winer B. J., 1991, Statistical principles in experimental design, 3

10.1016/0022-1031(71)90075-8

Zillmann D., 1979, Hostility and aggression