EMMAE failure detection system and failure evaluation over flight performance

Emerald - 2012
YuehengQiu1, WeiguoZhang1, XiaoxiongLiu1, PengxuanZhao2
1School of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
2First Aircraft Design Institute of AVIC, Xi'an, People's Republic of China

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present the research into fault detection and isolation (FDI) and evaluation of the reduction of performance after failures occurred in the flight control system (FCS) during its mission operation.Design/methodology/approachThe FDI is accomplished via using the multiple models scheme which is developed based on the Extend Kalman Filter (EKF) algorithm. Towards this objective, the healthy mode of the FCS under different type of failures, including the control surfaces and structural, should be considered. It developed a bank of extended multiple models adaptive estimation (EMMAE) to detect and isolate the above mentioned failures in the FCS. In addition, the performances including the flight envelope, the voyage and endurance in cruising are proposed to reference and evaluate the process of mission, especially for UAV under failure conditions.FindingsThe contribution of this paper is to provide the information not only about the failures, but also considering whether the UAV can accomplish the task for the ground station.Originality/valueThe main contribution of this paper is in the areas of the structural and control surface faults researching, which are occurred in the mission procedures and emphasized the identification of those failures' magnitudes. The FDI scheme includes the performance evaluation, while the evaluation obtained through the extensive numerical simulations and saved in the offline database. As a consequence, it is more accurate and less computationally demanding while evaluating the performance.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Awalt, B., Turner, D., Miller, R. and Chen, W.‐Z. (2003), “Extended Kalman filter applications to multi‐vehicle UAV cooperative controls”, 2nd AIAA “Unmanned Unlimited” Systems, Technologies, and Operations –Aerospace, San Diego, CA, 15‐18 September.

Clark, C.S. (1997), “Multiple model adaptive estimation and control redistribution performance on the VISTA F‐16 during partial actuator impairments”, MS thesis, AFIT/GE/ENG/97D‐23, School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright‐Patterson AFB, OH, June.

Ducard, G. and Geering, H.P. (2008), “Efficient nonlinear actuator fault detection and isolation system for unmanned aerial vehicles”, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 225‐37.

Keller, J., McKillip, R. and Kim, S. (2009), “Aircraft flight envelope determination using upset detection and physical modeling methods”, Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Chicago, IL, August.

Lane, D.W. (1993), “Mutiple model adaptive estimation applied to the LAMBDA URV for failure detection and identification”, MS thesis, AFIT/GE/ENG/93D‐23, School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright‐Patterson AFB, OH, December.

Lewis, R.W. (1996), “Multiple model adaptive estimation and control redistribution performance on the VISTA F‐16”, MS thesis, AFIT/GE/ENG/96D‐29, School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright‐Patterson AFB, OH, December.

Menke, T.E. and Maybeck, P.S. (1992), “Multiple model adaptive estimation applied to the VISTA F‐16 flight control system with actuator and sensor failures”, Proceedings of the IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Dayton, OH, May, pp. 441‐8.

Menke, T.E. and Maybeck, P.S. (1993), “Sensor/actuator failure detection in the VISTA F‐16 by multiple model adaptive estimation”, Proceedings of American Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, June, pp. 3135‐40.

Rupp, D., Ducard, G., Shafai, E. and Geering, H.P. (2005), “Extended multiple model adaptive estimation for the detection of sensor and actuator faults”, 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3079‐84.

Stepaniak, M.J. and Maybeck, P.S. (1997), “MMAE‐based control redistribution applied to the VISTA F‐16”, Proc. American Control Conference, June, pp. 133‐9.

Unnikrishnan, S. and Prasad, J.V.R. (2004), “Reactionary automatic envelope protection for autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles”, Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Providence, RI, August.

Eide, P.K. (1994), “Implementation and demonstration of a multiple model adaptive estimator failure detection system for the F‐16”, MS thesis, AFIT/GE/ENG/94D‐06, School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright‐Patterson AFB, OH, December.

Maybeck, P.S. and Hanlon, P.D. (1993), “Performance enhancement of a multiple model adaptive estimator”, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Antonio, TX, December, pp. 462‐8.

Pogoda, D.L. (1988), “Multiple model adaptive controller for the STOL F‐15 with sensor/actuator failures”, MS thesis, AFIT/GE/ENG/88D‐23, School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright‐Patterson AFB, OH, December.

Stevens, R.D. (1989), “Characterization of a reconfigurable multiple model adaptive controller using a STOL F‐15 model”, MS thesis, AFIT/GE/ENG/89D‐52, School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright‐Patterson AFB, OH, December.

Stratton, G.L. (1991), “Actuator and sensor failure identification using a multiple model adaptive technique for the VISTA F‐16”, MS thesis, AFIT/GE/ENG/91D‐14, School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright‐Patterson AFB, OH, December.