EFFECT OF ORIENTATION OF SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED CURVE NUMBERS IN RUNOFF CALCULATIONS1

Journal of the American Water Resources Association - Tập 36 Số 6 - Trang 1391-1400 - 2000
Glenn E. Moglen1
1Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 2074 (E-Mail: [email protected]).

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT: The NRCS curve number approach to runoff estimation has traditionally been to average or “lump” spatial variability into a single number for purposes of expediency and simplicity in calculations. In contrast, the weighted runoff curve number approach, which handles each individual pixel within the watershed separately, tends to result in larger estimates of runoff than the lumped approach. This work proposes further enhancements that consider not only spatial variability, but also the orientation of this variability with respect to the flow aggregation pattern of the drainage network. Results show that the proposed enhancements lead to much reduced estimates of runoff production. A revised model that considers overland flow lengths, consistent with existing NRCS concepts is proposed, which leads to only mildly reduced runoff estimates. Although more physically‐based, this revised model, which accounts directly for spatially distributed curve numbers and flow aggregation, leads to essentially the same results as the original, lumped runoff model when applied to three study watersheds. Philosophical issues and implications concerning the appropriateness of attempting to disaggregate lumped models are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson J. R. E. E.Hardy J. T.Roach andR. E.Witmer 1976.A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use With Remote Sensor Data.U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964 28pp.

10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00083-8

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb04150.x

Hawkins R. H., 1982, A Spatial Loss Rate Distribution Implicit in the Curve Number Method

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1996)122:5(319)

Jenson S. K., 1988, Extracting Topographic Structure From Digital Elevation Data for Geographic Information System Analysis, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54, 1593

10.1029/WR022i09Sp0177S

Moglen G. E., 1998, A Perspective on the Use of GIS in Hydrologic and Environmental Analysis in Maryland, Infrastructure, 3, 15

Natural Resources Conservation Service 2000 USDA‐NRCS Soils Data http://www.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/soils_dats.html.

10.1016/S0734-189X(84)80011-0

Ragan R. M., 1991, A Geographic Information, System to Support State‐Wide Hydrologic and NonpPoint Pollution Modeling

Rallison R. E., 1980, Origin and Evolution of the SCS Runoff Equation, 912

Rallison R. E., 1981, Rainfall‐Runoff Relationships, 353

Soil Conservation Service, 1985, National Engineering Handbook

Soil Conservation Service, 1986, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1995)121:3(234)

10.1002/hyp.3360050107

U.S. Geological Survey 2000.EROS Data Center http://edcwww.cr.usgs.gov/doc/edchome/ndcdb/ndcdb.html.