Dynamic assessment of writing ability in transcendence tasks based on Vygotskian perspective

Parisa Farrokh1, Ayda Rahmani1
1Department of English Translation, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 18, 465–483.

Baek, S. G., & Kim, J. K. (2003). The effect of dynamic assessment based instruction on childrenʼs learning. Asian Pacific Review, 3(1), 189–198.

Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the Washback concept in. Language Testing, 13(3), 257–279.

Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

Messick, S. (1988). The once and future issues of validity: Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement. In H. Wainer & H. I. Barun (Eds.), test validity. NJ. Erlbaum: Hillsdale.

Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L 2 learners of French. Pennsylvania State University, University Park: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer Publishing.

Shabani, K. (2014). Dynamic assessment of L2 listening comprehension in transcendence tasks. Social and Behavioural. Science, 98, 1729–1737.

Stanley, N. V. (1993). Gifted and the zone of proximal development. Gifted Educational International, 9, 78–81.

Tzuriel, D. (2000). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York: Plenum Publishers.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1988). The problem of age. New York: Plenum.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Mass: MIT Press.

Wiggle, S. C. (2008). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Paired versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Learning testing Journal, 26(1), 445–452.