Dual process theory and the context of choice: Comments on Dhar and Gorlin

Journal of Consumer Psychology - Tập 23 - Trang 561-563 - 2013
Keith E. Stanovich1
1University of Toronto, Canada

Tóm tắt

AbstractDhar and Gorlin show that default‐interventionist dual‐process theory differentially classifies several effects in the consumer choice literature and makes differential predictions across a variety of manipulations. One of the most startling differential classifications in their model is that it drives a wedge between the attraction and enhancement effects, because they arise from System 1 and System 2, respectively. System‐2 bias effects explain why sometimes less complex organisms (nonhumans, human children) can display more normative behavior than human adults. Such a finding does not at all undermine the heuristics and biases research tradition, as is sometimes argued.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson E., 1993, Value in ethics and economics 10.1177/0963721411434977 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 Evans J.St.B.T., 2010, Thinking twice: Two minds in one brain 10.1177/1745691612460685 Gigerenzer G., 1994, Subjective probability, 129 Hargreaves Heap S.P., 1992, Rationality and economics Hirschman A.O., 1986, Rival views of market society and other recent essays 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528272.003.0002 Kahneman D., 2011, Thinking, fast and slow 10.1515/9781400820832 10.2307/2940928 10.7208/chicago/9780226771199.001.0001 Stanovich K.E., 2011, Rationality and the reflective mind 10.1080/13546783.2012.713178 10.1017/S0140525X00003435 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0008 10.1093/mind/101.403.461