Dry matter yield and forage quality traits of oat ( Avena sativa L.) under integrative use of microbial and synthetic source of nitrogen
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aazadi, 2014, The study effect of nitrogen, Azotobacter spp. and Azospirillum spp. on phonological and morphological traits of durum wheat cultivars in Dehloran region, Iran, Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova, 47, 15, 10.2478/cerce-2014-0002
Abd El-Ghany, 2010, Effect of some soil microorganisms on soil properties and wheat production under north sinai conditions, J. App. Sci. Res., 6, 559
Afzal, 2012, Effect of nitrogen on growth and yield of sorghum forage (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench cv.) under three cuttings system, Cercetari agronomice in Moldova, 45, 57, 10.2478/v10298-012-0065-y
Ahmad, 2014, Effect of different levels of ndf on voluntary feed intake, dry matter digestibility and nutrients utilization in dry Nili Ravi buffaloes, J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 24, 1602
Alimadadi, 2010, Evaluating the effects of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms, mycorrhizal fungi and seed priming on nodulation of chickpea, Iranian J. Soil Res. (Formerly Soil Water Sci.), 24, 44
Bashan, 2004, Azospirillum- plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances, Can. J. Microbiol., 50, 521, 10.1139/w04-035
CIMMYT, 1988. From agronomic data to farmer recommendation: an economic training manual. Mexico, D.F: 25–33.
Damir, 2011, Cultivation of the bacterium Azotobacter chroococcum for preparation of biofertilizers, Afric. J. Biotech., 10, 3104, 10.5897/AJB10.1086
Economic survey of Pakistan, 2011–12. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock Division (Economic Wing), Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 17–37.
Eskandari, 2009, Intercropping of cereals and legumes for forage production, Not Sci. Biol., 1, 7, 10.15835/nsb113479
Glick, B.R., 2012. Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications, Scientifica, ID 963401, p. 15, <http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401>.
Iqbal, 2013, Impact nitrogenous fertilizer on yield and quality of oat, Pak. J. Sci., 65, 1
Kader, 2002, Effects of Azotobacter inoculant on the yield and nitrogen uptake by wheat, Online J. Biol. Sci., 2, 259, 10.3923/jbs.2002.259.261
Kumar, 2001, Establishment of phosphate solubilizing strains ofAzotobacter chroococcumin the rhizosphere and their effect on wheat cultivars under greenhouse conditions, Microbiol. Res., 156, 87, 10.1078/0944-5013-00081
Naseri, 2013, The Effect of deficit irrigation and Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum brasilense on grain yield, yield components of maize (S.C. 704) as a second cropping in western Iran, Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., 2, 104
Narula, 2002, Response of wheat genotypes to Azotobacter inoculation under rainfed conditions, Rachis, 17, 66
Narula, 2005, Impact of biofertilizers on grain yield in spring wheat under varying fertilizer conditions and wheat-cotton rotation, Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci., 51, 79, 10.1080/03650340400029382
Rana, 2014, Differential response of sorghum cultivars for fodder yield and quality, J. Glob. Innov. Agric. Soc. Sci., 2, 6, 10.17957/JGIASS/2.1.437
Shaalan, 2005, Influence of biofertilizers and chicken manure on growth, yield and seeds quality of (Nigella sativa L.) plants, Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 83, 811
Steel, 1997
Steenhoudt, 2000, Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 24, 487, 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00552.x
Yaduraju, 1996, NAR and CGR