Double Counting in Supply Chain Carbon Footprinting

Manufacturing and Service Operations Management - Tập 15 Số 4 - Trang 545-558 - 2013
Felipe Caro1, Charles J. Corbett1, Tarkan Tan2, Rob Zuidwijk3
1Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095
2School of Industrial Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
3Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Carbon footprinting is a tool for firms to determine the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with their supply chain or with a unit of final product or service. Carbon footprinting typically aims to identify where best to invest in emission reduction efforts, and/or to determine the proportion of total emissions that an individual firm is accountable for, whether financially and/or operationally. A major and underrecognized challenge in determining the appropriate allocation stems from the high degree to which GHG emissions are the result of joint efforts by multiple firms. We introduce a simple but general model of joint production of GHG emissions in general supply chains, decomposing the total footprint into processes, each of which can be influenced by any combination of firms. We analyze two main scenarios. In the first scenario, the social planner allocates emissions to individual firms and imposes a cost on them (such as a carbon tax) in proportion to the emissions allocated. In the second scenario, a carbon leader voluntarily agrees to offset all emissions in the entire supply chain and then contracts with individual firms to recoup (part of) the costs of those offsets. In both cases, we find that, to induce the optimal effort levels, the emissions need to be overallocated, even if the carbon tax is the true social cost of carbon. This is in contrast to the usual focus in the life-cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon footprinting literatures on avoiding double counting. Our work aims to lay the foundation for a framework to integrate the economics- and LCA-based perspectives on supply chain carbon footprinting.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1287/mnsc.46.6.776.11939

10.1287/mnsc.47.1.173.10673

10.1287/mnsc.1050.0408

10.1016/j.jet.2005.05.005

Bazaraa MS, 1979, Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms

10.1109/TASE.2012.2203304

10.2307/2556017

Birchall J, 2010, Financial Times

Bovenberg AL, 1996, Amer. Econom. Rev., 86, 985

Buchanan JM, 1969, Amer. Econom. Rev., 59, 174

Cachon GP (2011) Supply chain design and the cost of greenhouse gas emissions. Working paper, The Wharton School, Univerisity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

10.1287/mnsc.1090.1008

10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.05.011

10.1287/mnsc.47.7.881.9802

10.1287/msom.1060.0095

10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.021

10.2307/2555528

Fowlie M, Reguant M, Ryan SP (2012) Market-based emissions regulation and industry dynamics. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.

Fudenberg D, 1991, Game Theory

10.1080/09535310500283492

Hoen KMR, 2012, Flexible Services Manufacturing J.

10.2307/3003457

10.1021/es901643a

10.1007/s10657-007-9032-8

Keskin N, Plambeck E (2011) Greenhouse gas emissions accounting: Allocating emissions from processes to co-products. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00235.x

Kolk A, 2004, Euro. Man. J., 22, 304

Koomen A (2012) Evaluating the impact of system boundaries on decisions that affect CO2 emissions and costs. Unpublished master's thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

10.2307/2298126

10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00067.x

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018

10.1016/0022-0531(87)90021-4

10.1021/es703112w

10.2307/2527107

McPhaul J, 2007, Reuters

10.1093/oxrep/19.3.362

10.1016/0301-4215(96)00064-X

10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00443.x

10.1007/s11367-008-0008-x

10.1287/mnsc.1100.1146

10.1016/0095-0696(88)90030-7

10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020

10.1287/mnsc.8.3.325

10.1006/jeth.1998.2496

10.1017/CBO9780511804526

10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.002

Tol RSJ, 2008, Economics, 2

10.1162/rest.91.1.1

10.1287/mnsc.1060.0634