Does the presentation of true costs at the point of purchase nudge consumers toward sustainable product options?
Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Trang 1-14 - 2024
Tóm tắt
Do true cost campaigns (TCCs)—which display prices at the point of purchase that include social and environmental negative externalities—nudge consumers toward more expensive sustainable products? From a theoretical point of view, the answer is promising: Communicating true costs means introducing external reference prices that provide a benchmark for consumers to assess price acceptability. Showing true costs triggers a general reference to the price of sustainability, and the higher price of sustainable products becomes at least partially explained by their lower “hidden costs” (i.e., costs to compensate for all environmental and social impacts). In two empirical studies, we demonstrate that for TCCs to be effective, the hidden costs for the sustainable products must be lower than those for the conventional alternatives. Interestingly, under this condition, TCCs have an effect in markets characterized by a larger (study 1) and a smaller (study 2) green gap. In both studies, we find that increased perceived price fairness explains the effect of TCCs, as measured by the relative preference for the sustainable compared to the conventional product. In addition, we see that the price difference between the two products plays a significant role in forming this preference judgment, independent of other factors included in the model and especially independent of TCC.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? J Bus Ethics, 42(3), 281–304.
Bertini, M., & Wathieu, L. (2008). Research note—Attention arousal through price partitioning. Marketing Science, 27(2), 236–246.
Bissinger, K. (2019). Price fairness: Two-stage comparison of conventional and fair-trade prices. J Int Consum Mark, 31(2), 86–97.
Bolton, L. E., Keh, H. T., & Alba, J. W. (2010). How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture? J Mark Res, 47(3), 564–576.
Bornemann, T., & Homburg, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. J Consum Res, 38(3), 490–504.
Bürgin, D., & Wilken, R. (2022). Increasing consumers’ purchase intentions toward fair-trade products through partitioned pricing. J Bus Ethics, 181, 1015–1040.
Campbell, M. C. (2007). “Says who?!” How the source of price information and affect influence perceived price (un)fairness. J Mark Res, 36(2), 187–199.
Chouinard, Y., Ellison, J., & Ridgeway, R. (2011). The sustainable economy. Harv Bus Rev, 89(10), 52–62.
Dholakia U (2023) Price transparency. Trans Business: An Integr View 49–82.
Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Commun Monographs, 72(2), 144–168.
Dong, C., & Wedel, M. (2017). BANOVA: An R-package for hierarchical Bayesian ANOVA. J Stat Softw, 81(9), 1–46.
Eisenbeiss, M., Wilken, R., Skiera, B., & Cornelissen, M. (2015). What makes deal-of-the-day promotions really effective? The interplay of discount and time constraint with product type. Int J Res Mark, 32(4), 387–397.
Gemmill-Herren B, Baker LE, Daniels PA (2021) True cost accounting for food: Balancing the scale. Taylor & Francis.
Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal Retailing, 89(1), 44–61.
Hoppe, A., Vieira, L. M., & de Barcellos, M. D. (2013). Consumer behaviour toward organic food in Porto Alegre: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Revista De Economia e Sociologia Rural, 51(1), 69–90.
Ingenbleek, P. T. M. (2015). Price strategies for sustainable food products. British Food Journal, 117(2), 915–928.
IPCC (2022) Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC, H.-O. Pörtner, et al. (eds.). Cambridge University Press.
Johnstone, M.-L., & Tan, L. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour. J Bus Ethics, 132(2), 311–328.
Kopalle, P. K., & Lindsey-Mullikin, J. (2003). The impact of external reference price on consumer price expectations. J Retailing, 79(4), 225–236.
Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. J Mark Res, 30(2), 234–245.
Matzler, K., Würtele, A., & Renzl, B. (2006). Dimensions of price satisfaction: A study in the retail banking industry. Int J Bank Mark, 24(4), 216–231.
Pedregal, V. D., & Ozcaglar-Toulouse, N. (2011). Why does not everybody purchase fair-trade products? The question of the fairness of fair-trade products’ consumption for consumers. Int J Consum Stud, 35(6), 655–660.
Penny (2020) PENNY honors “true costs” for groceries: How much does the sausage cost? https://www.rewe-group.com/de/presse-und-medien/newsroom/stories/penny-zeichnet-wahre-kosten-bei-lebensmitteln-aus-was-kostet-die-wurst/ Last access 05 February 2023.
Penny (2023) Wahre Kosten. https://www.penny.de/aktionen/wahrekosten
Posavac, S. S., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Seo, J. Y., & Iacobucci, D. (2014). How attitudes toward product categories drive individual brand attitudes and choice. Psychology Marketing, 31(10), 843–852.
Reimers, H., & Hoffmann, S. (2019). Transparent price labelling for sustainable products. Mark: ZFP J Res Manag, 41(2), 21–36.
Rewe (2023) #unthinkable: REWE starts communication on sustainability. https://mediacenter.rewe.de/pressemitteilungen/rewe-startet-umdenkbar
Rossi, F., & Chintagunta, P. K. (2016). Price transparency and retail prices: Evidence from fuel price signs in the Italian highway system. J Mark Res, 53(3), 407–423.
Samoggia, A. (2016). Wine and health: Faraway concepts? British Food Journal, 118(4), 946–960.
Schäufele, I., & Hamm, U. (2017). Consumers’ perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: A review. J Clean Prod, 147, 379–394.
Stagl, S. (2002). Local organic food markets: Potentials and limitations for contributing to sustainable development. Empirica, 29(2), 145–162.
Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. J Clin Psychol, 28(2), 191–193.
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J Retailing, 77(2), 203–220.
Völckner, F. (2008). The dual role of price: Decomposing consumers’ reactions to price. J Acad Mark Sciss, 36(3), 359–377.
Wang, W., Krishna, A., & McFerran, B. (2017). Turning off the lights: Consumers’ environmental efforts depend on visible efforts of firms. J Mark Res, 54(3), 478–494.
Wedel, M., & Dong, C. (2020). BANOVA: Bayesian analysis of experiments in consumer psychology. J Consum Psychol, 30(1), 3–23.