Does causation entail emptiness? On a point of dispute between Abhidharma and Madhyamaka
Tóm tắt
The aim of this paper is to assess the relation between causation and the notion of emptiness described in Buddhist philosophy. While the Madhyamaka school argues that some entity’s being caused implies its being empty, some contemporary authors have argued that there is a ‘Humean’ regularity account of causation that can both be understood as a plausible model of the earlier Buddhist Abhidharma account of causation and also block the Madhyamaka inference from causation to emptiness. After describing the Abhidharma account of causation, the ‘Humean’ regularity account and the Madhyamaka argument from causation to emptiness, we assess some ways in which this argument may be developed, with particular focus on the ‘ladder of causation’ and on the Madhyamaka account of time. The debate about the relation between causation and emptiness, it appears, is a facet of a more comprehensive metaphysical debate between a (moderate) foundationalism and a thoroughgoing anti-foundationalism.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anālayo, B. (2018). Rebirth in early Buddhism & current research. Wisdom Publications.
Bareinboim, E., Correa, J. D., Ibeling, D., & Icard, T. F. (2022). On Pearl’s hierarchy and the foundations of causal inference. In Hector Geffner, Rina Dechter, Joseph Y. Halpern: Probabilistic and Causal Inference: The Works of Judea Pearl, Association for Computing Machinery (pp. 507–556). New York.
Bernstein, S. (2017). Causal idealism. In Tyron Goldschmidt, Kenneth L. Pearce: Idealism. New Essays in Metaphysics (pp. 217-230). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bitbol, M. (2019) Maintenant la finitude. Peut-on penser l’absolu? Flammarion, Paris.
Bliss, R. (2015). On being Humean about the emptiness of causation. In K. Tanaka, Y. Deguchi, J. L. Garfield, & G. Priest (Eds.), The Moon Points Back (pp. 67–96). Oxford University Press.
Cartwright, N. (1989). Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Clarendon Press.
Chakrabarti, A. (2019). Realisms interlinked. Object, subject, and other subjects. Bloomsbury Academic, London.
Compendium Compilation Committee. (2017). Science and philosophy in the Indian Buddhist classics. Volume 1: The Physical World, Wisdom Publications, Boston.
Dennett, D. (1991). Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 27–51.
Ganeri, J. (2001). Philosophy in classical India. The proper work of reason. Routledge, London, New York.
Garfield, J. (1994). Dependent arising and the emptiness of emptiness: Why did Nāgārjuna start with causation? Philosophy East and West, 44(2), 219–250.
Garfield, J. (2001). “Nāgārjuna’s theory of causality: implications sacred and profane. Philosophy East and West, 51(4), 507–524.
Garfield, J. (2015). Engaging Buddhism. Oxford University Press, New York.
Garfield, J. (2019). The concealed influence of custom. Oxford University Press, New York.
Gold, J. (2015). Paving the great way. Columbia University Press, New York.
Goodman, C. (2004). The treasury of metaphysics and the physical world. Philosophical Quarterly, 54(216), 389–401.
James, S. (2018). Madhyamaka, metaphysical realism, and the possibility of an ancestral world. Philosophy East and West, 68(4), 1116–1133.
Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford University Press.
de la Vallée Poussin, L. (1913). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna: avec la Prasannapadā commentaire de Candrakīrti, Académie imperiale des sciences, St Petersburg.
de la Vallée Poussin, L. (1988-1990). Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam of Vasubandhu. English translation by Leo M. Pruden, Asian Humanities Press, Berkeley.
Lewis, D. (1986). Philosophical papers II. Oxford University Press.
Ngawang Samten, G, & Garfield, J. (2006). Ocean of reasoning. Oxford University Press, New York.
Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The Book of Why. Basic Books.
Siderits, M. (2004). Causation and emptiness in early Madhyamaka. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 32(4), 393–419.
Siderits, M. (2014). Causation, ‘Humean’ causation, and emptiness. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42, 433–449.
Siderits, M. (2016). Studies in Buddhist philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Siderits, M. (2021). Buddhism as philosophy, 2nd edition. Hackett, Indianapolis, Cambridge.
Siderits, M. (2022a). How things are. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Siderits, M. (2022b). “Nāgārjuna.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.763
Siderits, M., & Katsura, S.(2013). Nāgārjuna’s middle way: The Mūlamadhyamakākarikā. Wisdom.
Tsong kha pa. (1992). dBu ma rtsa ba’i tshig le’u byas pa shes rab ces bya ba’i rnam bshad rigs pa’i rgya mtsho, wA Na mtho slob dge ldan spyi las khang, Sarnath, Varanasi.
Weatherson, B. (2015). Humean supervenience. In B. Loewer & J. Schaffer (Eds.), A Companion to David Lewis (pp. 101–115). John Wiley & Sons.
Westerhoff, J. (2007). The Madhyamaka concept of svabhāva: ontological and cognitive aspects. Asian Philosophy, 17(1), 17–45.
Westerhoff, J. (2009). Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka. A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Westerhoff, J. (2018). The golden age of Indian Buddhist philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Westerhoff, J. (2020). The non-existence of the real world. Oxford University Press.